English Devin, Bowleg Lisa, Del Río-González Ana Maria, Tschann Jeanne M, Agans Robert P, Malebranche David J
Department of Psychology, The George Washington University.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine.
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2017 Apr;23(2):185-199. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000137. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
Although social science research has examined police and law enforcement-perpetrated discrimination against Black men using policing statistics and implicit bias studies, there is little quantitative evidence detailing this phenomenon from the perspective of Black men. Consequently, there is a dearth of research detailing how Black men's perspectives on police and law enforcement-related stress predict negative physiological and psychological health outcomes. This study addresses these gaps with the qualitative development and quantitative test of the Police and Law Enforcement (PLE) Scale.
In Study 1, we used thematic analysis on transcripts of individual qualitative interviews with 90 Black men to assess key themes and concepts and develop quantitative items. In Study 2, we used 2 focus groups comprised of 5 Black men each (n = 10), intensive cognitive interviewing with a separate sample of Black men (n = 15), and piloting with another sample of Black men (n = 13) to assess the ecological validity of the quantitative items. For Study 3, we analyzed data from a sample of 633 Black men between the ages of 18 and 65 to test the factor structure of the PLE, as we all as its concurrent validity and convergent/discriminant validity.
Qualitative analyses and confirmatory factor analyses suggested that a 5-item, 1-factor measure appropriately represented respondents' experiences of police/law enforcement discrimination. As hypothesized, the PLE was positively associated with measures of racial discrimination and depressive symptoms.
Preliminary evidence suggests that the PLE is a reliable and valid measure of Black men's experiences of discrimination with police/law enforcement. (PsycINFO Database Record
尽管社会科学研究已利用警务统计数据和内隐偏见研究考察了警察及执法部门对黑人男性的歧视,但从黑人男性的角度详细说明这一现象的定量证据却很少。因此,缺乏研究来详细说明黑人男性对警察及与执法相关压力的看法如何预测负面的生理和心理健康结果。本研究通过警察与执法(PLE)量表的定性开发和定量测试来填补这些空白。
在研究1中,我们对90名黑人男性的个人定性访谈记录进行了主题分析,以评估关键主题和概念并制定定量项目。在研究2中,我们使用了2个焦点小组(每个小组由5名黑人男性组成,n = 10),对另一组黑人男性样本(n = 15)进行深入认知访谈,并对另一组黑人男性样本(n = 13)进行试点,以评估定量项目的生态效度。在研究3中,我们分析了633名年龄在18至65岁之间的黑人男性样本的数据,以测试PLE的因子结构及其同时效度和聚合/区分效度。
定性分析和验证性因子分析表明,一个包含5个项目的单因子量表能够恰当地代表受访者对警察/执法部门歧视的经历。正如所假设的那样,PLE与种族歧视和抑郁症状的测量指标呈正相关。
初步证据表明,PLE是衡量黑人男性在警察/执法部门遭受歧视经历的可靠且有效的指标。(PsycINFO数据库记录)