Old Dominion University.
Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2017 Nov 1;42(10):1087-1107. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx078.
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods are increasingly used in social and health sciences, but the feasibility and best practices for using EMA with youth are not yet clear. We conducted a systematic review of studies that used self-report EMA methods with youth; the goal was to identify common approaches and challenges to implementation and develop recommendations for future research. We examined 54 peer-reviewed papers that reported on 24 unique studies. Papers were evaluated using a standardized, three-dimensional coding scheme focused on the following: (1) sample characteristics; (2) EMA data collection methods (sampling duration, frequency, hardware/software); (3) study implementation methods (technical/logistical challenges, training participants, compliance). Overall, the research suggests EMA can be successfully implemented with youth (age ∼ ≥7) from diverse backgrounds, but protocol adaptations may be necessary for younger children. Study design and implementation challenges and recommendations for research on youth are provided.
生态瞬时评估(EMA)方法在社会和健康科学中越来越多地被使用,但使用 EMA 方法对青少年进行研究的可行性和最佳实践尚不清楚。我们对使用自我报告 EMA 方法对青少年进行研究的文献进行了系统回顾,旨在确定实施中的常见方法和挑战,并为未来的研究提出建议。我们研究了 54 篇同行评议的论文,这些论文报告了 24 项独特的研究。论文使用标准化的三维编码方案进行评估,重点关注以下三个方面:(1)样本特征;(2)EMA 数据收集方法(采样持续时间、频率、硬件/软件);(3)研究实施方法(技术/后勤挑战、培训参与者、依从性)。总体而言,研究表明 EMA 可以成功地应用于来自不同背景的青少年(年龄≥7 岁),但对于年龄较小的儿童可能需要进行方案调整。本文提供了关于青少年研究的设计和实施挑战及建议。