Ruckert Kelsey L, Shaffer Gary, Pollard David, Guan Yawen, Wong Tony E, Forest Chris E, Keller Klaus
Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
GAIA Antarctica, University of Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0170052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170052. eCollection 2017.
The response of the Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) to changing climate forcings is an important driver of sea-level changes. Anthropogenic climate change may drive a sizeable AIS tipping point response with subsequent increases in coastal flooding risks. Many studies analyzing flood risks use simple models to project the future responses of AIS and its sea-level contributions. These analyses have provided important new insights, but they are often silent on the effects of potentially important processes such as Marine Ice Sheet Instability (MISI) or Marine Ice Cliff Instability (MICI). These approximations can be well justified and result in more parsimonious and transparent model structures. This raises the question of how this approximation impacts hindcasts and projections. Here, we calibrate a previously published and relatively simple AIS model, which neglects the effects of MICI and regional characteristics, using a combination of observational constraints and a Bayesian inversion method. Specifically, we approximate the effects of missing MICI by comparing our results to those from expert assessments with more realistic models and quantify the bias during the last interglacial when MICI may have been triggered. Our results suggest that the model can approximate the process of MISI and reproduce the projected median melt from some previous expert assessments in the year 2100. Yet, our mean hindcast is roughly 3/4 of the observed data during the last interglacial period and our mean projection is roughly 1/6 and 1/10 of the mean from a model accounting for MICI in the year 2100. These results suggest that missing MICI and/or regional characteristics can lead to a low-bias during warming period AIS melting and hence a potential low-bias in projected sea levels and flood risks.
南极冰盖(AIS)对气候变化强迫的响应是海平面变化的一个重要驱动因素。人为气候变化可能引发AIS的一个相当大的临界点响应,随后沿海洪水风险增加。许多分析洪水风险的研究使用简单模型来预测AIS未来的响应及其对海平面的贡献。这些分析提供了重要的新见解,但它们往往没有考虑到潜在重要过程的影响,如海洋冰盖失稳(MISI)或海洋冰崖失稳(MICI)。这些近似是有充分理由的,并导致更简洁和透明的模型结构。这就提出了一个问题,即这种近似如何影响后推和预测。在这里,我们使用观测约束和贝叶斯反演方法的组合,校准了一个先前发表的相对简单的AIS模型,该模型忽略了MICI和区域特征的影响。具体来说,我们通过将我们的结果与来自更现实模型的专家评估结果进行比较,来近似缺失的MICI的影响,并量化在最后一个间冰期可能触发MICI时的偏差。我们的结果表明,该模型可以近似MISI过程,并重现一些先前专家评估中预测的2100年的中位数融化量。然而,我们的平均后推值约为最后一个间冰期观测数据的3/4,我们的平均预测值约为2100年考虑MICI的模型平均值的1/6和1/10。这些结果表明,缺失的MICI和/或区域特征可能导致变暖期AIS融化期间的低偏差,从而导致预测海平面和洪水风险的潜在低偏差。