• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帽袖辅助结肠镜检查与标准结肠镜检查对腺瘤检测的比较:一项随机背靠背研究。

Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, School of Medicine, Naples, Italy.

Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, School of Medicine, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027
PMID:28082115
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EndoCuff is a disposable device applied to standard colonoscopes to improve mucosal visualization. Randomized parallel trials have shown that EndoCuff increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The primary aim of this study was to compare the ADR between EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopies (EAC) and standard colonoscopies within a randomized back-to-back trial.

METHODS

This was a single-center randomized crossover study (NCT02374515) involving adult patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Participants received back-to-back standard colonoscopies and EACs in a random order, performed by the same endoscopist. All polyps were excised, but only those proven at histology to be adenomas were considered for analysis.

RESULTS

From February 2015 to March 2016, a total of 288 patients were enrolled, and 274 were included in the per-protocol analysis. Compared with standard colonoscopies, EACs increased the ADR (29.6% vs 26.3%; P < .01) and the number of diagnosed adenomas (176 vs 129; P < .01), particularly in the left (73 vs 46; P < .01) and right sides of the colon (83 vs 63; P < .01). EAC increased the detection of adenomas <5 mm (129 vs 84; P < .01), but no difference was found with regard to larger lesions. In 7.3% of patients, findings of EndoCuff shortened the surveillance interval determined by standard colonoscopy findings. EndoCuff caused 7 mucosal erosions (2.5% of patients), requiring a mucosal adrenaline injection in 1 case.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of EndoCuff increases the number of identified adenomas, primarily small adenomas in the left and right sides of the colon. This increases the ADR and allows a better definition of the surveillance program. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02374515.).

摘要

背景和目的

EndoCuff 是一种应用于标准结肠镜的一次性设备,可改善黏膜可视化效果。随机平行试验表明,EndoCuff 可提高腺瘤检出率(ADR)。本研究的主要目的是在一项随机背靠背试验中比较 EndoCuff 辅助结肠镜检查(EAC)和标准结肠镜检查的 ADR。

方法

这是一项单中心、随机交叉研究(NCT02374515),纳入接受筛查、监测或诊断性结肠镜检查的成年患者。参与者以随机顺序接受背靠背的标准结肠镜检查和 EAC,由同一位内镜医生进行。所有息肉均被切除,但仅分析经组织学证实为腺瘤的息肉。

结果

2015 年 2 月至 2016 年 3 月,共纳入 288 例患者,274 例患者纳入意向治疗分析。与标准结肠镜检查相比,EAC 增加了 ADR(29.6%比 26.3%;P<0.01)和诊断腺瘤的数量(176 个比 129 个;P<0.01),尤其是在结肠的左侧(73 个比 46 个;P<0.01)和右侧(83 个比 63 个;P<0.01)。EAC 增加了<5mm 腺瘤的检出率(129 个比 84 个;P<0.01),但较大病变的检出率无差异。在 7.3%的患者中,EndoCuff 的检查结果缩短了标准结肠镜检查结果确定的监测间隔。EndoCuff 导致 7 例黏膜糜烂(占患者的 2.5%),其中 1 例需要黏膜肾上腺素注射。

结论

使用 EndoCuff 增加了腺瘤的数量,主要是结肠左侧和右侧的小腺瘤。这提高了 ADR,并能更好地定义监测计划。(临床试验注册号:NCT02374515)。

相似文献

1
Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.帽袖辅助结肠镜检查与标准结肠镜检查对腺瘤检测的比较:一项随机背靠背研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
2
The impact of EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy on the polyp detection rate: A cross-over randomized back-to-back study.EndoCuff 辅助结肠镜检查对息肉检出率的影响:一项交叉随机背靠背研究。
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;25(2):102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2023.11.007. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
3
Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT).内镜辅助套扎圈结肠切除术与帽辅助结肠切除术在腺瘤检测中的比较:随机串联研究——套扎圈-帽检测试验(DETECT)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Apr;91(4):894-904.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.046. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
4
Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.根据病变位置和内镜医师培训水平评估帽辅助结肠镜检查的疗效。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 28;21(20):6261-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6261.
5
Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Endocuff 结肠镜与常规结肠镜检查对腺瘤的检出率:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):438-445. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310097. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Cuff-assisted versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: results of a randomized study.带气囊辅助管与帽式辅助管结肠镜检查用于腺瘤检测的随机研究结果。
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):742-749. doi: 10.1055/a-0901-7306. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy.随机对照试验:Endocuff 辅助结肠镜检查与透明帽辅助结肠镜检查在腺瘤检出率方面的比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;34(9):1492-1496. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14771. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
8
Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用内镜外套管对结肠镜检查结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 7;25(9):1158-1170. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1158.
9
Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial.Endocuff Vision 提高腺瘤检出率:ADENOMA 随机对照试验。
Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):280-288. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
10
Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial.基于粪便潜血试验的英国结直肠癌筛查计划中,内镜黏膜下剥离(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)与标准结肠镜检查的比较:一项随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1043-1050. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111718. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
One in three adenomas could be missed by white-light colonoscopy - findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis.白光结肠镜检查可能会漏诊三分之一的腺瘤——一项系统评价和荟萃分析的结果
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03679-4.
2
Endocuff Vision-Assisted Resection for Difficult Colonic Lesions-Preliminary Results of a Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Pilot Study.Endocuff视觉辅助切除困难结肠病变——一项多中心、前瞻性随机试点研究的初步结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 28;12(15):4980. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154980.
3
Can Computed Tomography Colonography Replace Optical Colonoscopy in Detecting Colorectal Lesions?: State of the Art.
计算机断层结肠成像在检测结直肠病变方面能否取代光学结肠镜检查?:最新进展
Clin Endosc. 2022 Mar;55(2):183-190. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.254. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
4
EndoCuff-Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Standard Colonoscopy in Colonic Polyp Detection-Experience from a Single Tertiary Centre.单中心三级医院经验:EndoCuff辅助结肠镜检查与标准结肠镜检查在结肠息肉检测中的对比
Curr Health Sci J. 2021 Jan-Mar;47(1):33-41. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.47.01.06. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
Editorial: Cuff- and cap-assisted colonoscopy: More questions than answers.社论:袖套和帽辅助结肠镜检查:问题多于答案。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 May;9(4):425-426. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12078. Epub 2021 May 12.
6
Efficacy of Endocuff Vision compared to first-generation Endocuff in adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate in high-definition colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.在高清结肠镜检查中,Endocuff Vision与第一代Endocuff在腺瘤检出率和息肉检出率方面的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jan;9(1):E41-E50. doi: 10.1055/a-1293-7327. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
7
Serrated lesions of the colon and rectum: Emergent epidemiological data and molecular pathways.结肠和直肠的锯齿状病变:最新流行病学数据和分子途径
Open Med (Wars). 2020 Nov 9;15(1):1087-1095. doi: 10.1515/med-2020-0226. eCollection 2020.
8
Impact of cuff-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.袖套辅助结肠镜检查对腺瘤检测的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20243. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020243.
9
Endocuff-Assisted versus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Performed by Trainees: A Retrospective Study.实习医生进行的Endocuff辅助与帽辅助结肠镜检查:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Endosc. 2020 May;53(3):339-345. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.124. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
10
Comparison of colon adenoma detection rates using cap-assisted and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.使用帽辅助结肠镜和Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查的结肠腺瘤检出率比较:一项随机对照试验
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Dec;7(12):E1585-E1591. doi: 10.1055/a-0996-7891. Epub 2019 Nov 25.