• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EndoCuff 辅助结肠镜检查对息肉检出率的影响:一项交叉随机背靠背研究。

The impact of EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy on the polyp detection rate: A cross-over randomized back-to-back study.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Liver Unit, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Liver Unit, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Gastroenterology Division, Endemic Medicine Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Arab J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;25(2):102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2023.11.007. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajg.2023.11.007
PMID:38418285
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and most CRCs develop from polyps with malignant potential. We aimed to study the difference in polyp detection rate between EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopies (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at Cairo University Hospitals on patients referred for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy from July 2018 to August 2020. All included patients underwent back-to-back standard colonoscopy (SC) and ENDOCUFF VISION-assisted colonoscopies (EAC).

RESULTS

214 patients were included in this study. In comparison between EAC and SC, EAC increased the polyp detection rate (69 (32.24 %) vs. 57(26.64 %) (p < 0.05), EAC increased the detection of diminutive polyps ≤ 5 mm (104 vs. 81) (p < 0.05), and small polyps 6-9 mm (12 vs. 10) while there was no difference in large polyps ≥ 10 mm. EAC increased the adenoma detection rate (ADR) (37 (17.2 %) vs. 32(14.9 %) (p < 0.05). The findings detected by EAC shortened the interval of surveillance determined by SC findings. EndoCuff caused six mucosal erosions (2.8 %) in patients.

CONCLUSION

EAC increases the number of detected colonic polyps, primarily small polyps on the left and right sides of the colon.

摘要

背景和研究目的

结直肠癌(CRC)是全球最常见的癌症之一,大多数 CRC 由具有恶性潜能的息肉发展而来。我们旨在研究 EndoCuff 辅助结肠镜检查(EAC)和标准结肠镜检查(SC)之间息肉检出率的差异。

患者和方法

这项研究在开罗大学医院进行,纳入 2018 年 7 月至 2020 年 8 月期间因筛查或诊断性结肠镜检查而就诊的患者。所有纳入的患者均接受了标准结肠镜检查(SC)和 ENDOCUFF VISION 辅助结肠镜检查(EAC)的背靠背检查。

结果

本研究共纳入 214 例患者。与 SC 相比,EAC 增加了息肉检出率(69(32.24%)比 57(26.64%)(p < 0.05),EAC 增加了直径≤5mm 的微小息肉检出率(104 比 81)(p < 0.05),以及 6-9mm 的小息肉检出率(12 比 10),而直径≥10mm 的大息肉检出率无差异。EAC 增加了腺瘤检出率(ADR)(37(17.2%)比 32(14.9%)(p < 0.05)。EAC 发现的息肉缩短了 SC 发现的监测间隔。EndoCuff 在 6 例患者中引起了黏膜糜烂(2.8%)。

结论

EAC 增加了结肠息肉的检出数量,主要是结肠左侧和右侧的小息肉。

相似文献

1
The impact of EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy on the polyp detection rate: A cross-over randomized back-to-back study.EndoCuff 辅助结肠镜检查对息肉检出率的影响:一项交叉随机背靠背研究。
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;25(2):102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2023.11.007. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.帽袖辅助结肠镜检查与标准结肠镜检查对腺瘤检测的比较:一项随机背靠背研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
3
Cuff-assisted versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: results of a randomized study.带气囊辅助管与帽式辅助管结肠镜检查用于腺瘤检测的随机研究结果。
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):742-749. doi: 10.1055/a-0901-7306. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy increases polyp detection rate: a simulated randomized study involving an anatomic colorectal model and 32 international endoscopists.Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查可提高息肉检出率:一项涉及解剖学结直肠模型和32名国际内镜医师的模拟随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):288-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4208-8. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
5
Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT).内镜辅助套扎圈结肠切除术与帽辅助结肠切除术在腺瘤检测中的比较:随机串联研究——套扎圈-帽检测试验(DETECT)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Apr;91(4):894-904.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.046. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
6
The effect of the endoscopic device Endocuff™/Endocuff vision™ on quality standards in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.内镜设备Endocuff™/Endocuff vision™对结肠镜检查质量标准的影响:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr;25(4):573-585. doi: 10.1111/codi.16444. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
7
Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial.Endocuff Vision 提高腺瘤检出率:ADENOMA 随机对照试验。
Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):280-288. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
8
Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.内镜辅助结肠镜检查与帽辅助结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Dec;35(12):2066-2073. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15155. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
9
Endocuff assisted colonoscopy significantly increases sessile serrated adenoma detection in veterans.Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查显著提高了退伍军人中无蒂锯齿状腺瘤的检出率。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Aug;8(4):636-642. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.03.07.
10
Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial.基于粪便潜血试验的英国结直肠癌筛查计划中,内镜黏膜下剥离(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)与标准结肠镜检查的比较:一项随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1043-1050. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111718. Epub 2017 Jun 14.