• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Endocuff Vision 提高腺瘤检出率:ADENOMA 随机对照试验。

Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, UK.

Department of Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton, UK.

出版信息

Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):280-288. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889. Epub 2018 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889
PMID:29363535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6352411/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Low adenoma detection rates (ADR) are linked to increased postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates and reduced cancer survival. Devices to enhance mucosal visualisation such as Endocuff Vision (EV) may improve ADR. This multicentre randomised controlled trial compared ADR between EV-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC).

DESIGN

Patients referred because of symptoms, surveillance or following a positive faecal occult blood test (FOBt) as part of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme were recruited from seven hospitals. ADR, mean adenomas per procedure, size and location of adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, EV removal rate, caecal intubation rate, procedural time, patient experience, effect of EV on workload and adverse events were measured.

RESULTS

1772 patients (57% male, mean age 62 years) were recruited over 16 months with 45% recruited through screening. EAC increased ADR globally from 36.2% to 40.9% (P=0.02). The increase was driven by a 10.8% increase in FOBt-positive screening patients (50.9% SC vs 61.7% EAC, P<0.001). EV patients had higher detection of mean adenomas per procedure, sessile serrated polyps, left-sided, diminutive, small adenomas and cancers (cancer 4.1% vs 2.3%, P=0.02). EV removal rate was 4.1%. Median intubation was a minute quicker with EAC (P=0.001), with no difference in caecal intubation rate or withdrawal time. EAC was well tolerated but caused a minor increase in discomfort on anal intubation in patients undergoing colonoscopy with no or minimal sedation. There were no significant EV adverse events.

CONCLUSION

EV significantly improved ADR in bowel cancer screening patients and should be used to improve colonoscopic detection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02552017, Results; ISRCTN11821044, Results.

摘要

目的

腺瘤检出率 (ADR) 较低与结直肠癌术后结直肠癌症发生率增加和癌症生存率降低有关。增强黏膜可视化的设备,如 Endocuff Vision (EV),可能会提高 ADR。这项多中心随机对照试验比较了 EV 辅助结肠镜检查 (EAC) 与标准结肠镜检查 (SC) 的 ADR。

设计

因症状、监测或粪便潜血试验 (FOBt) 阳性而接受检查的患者,以及作为结直肠癌筛查计划一部分的患者,从七家医院招募。测量 ADR、平均每例检出的腺瘤数量、腺瘤的大小和位置、无蒂锯齿状息肉、EV 切除率、盲肠插管率、操作时间、患者体验、EV 对工作量的影响和不良事件。

结果

在 16 个月内招募了 1772 名患者(57%为男性,平均年龄 62 岁),其中 45%通过筛查招募。EAC 使全球 ADR 从 36.2%增加到 40.9%(P=0.02)。FOBt 阳性筛查患者的 ADR 增加了 10.8%(50.9% SC 与 61.7% EAC,P<0.001),这一增加是主要原因。EV 患者的平均每例检出腺瘤数量、无蒂锯齿状息肉、左侧、微小、小腺瘤和癌症的检出率更高(癌症 4.1%比 2.3%,P=0.02)。EV 切除率为 4.1%。EAC 使插管时间缩短了一分钟(P=0.001),但盲肠插管率或退出时间没有差异。EAC 耐受良好,但在没有或很少镇静的情况下进行结肠镜检查时,插入肛门时会引起轻微不适。EV 无明显不良事件。

结论

EV 显著提高了结直肠癌筛查患者的 ADR,应使用 EV 来提高结肠镜检查的检出率。

试验注册号

NCT02552017,结果;ISRCTN11821044,结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b89/6352411/207f1661d73d/gutjnl-2017-314889f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b89/6352411/b2901e74bf7e/gutjnl-2017-314889f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b89/6352411/c795230271ee/gutjnl-2017-314889f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b89/6352411/207f1661d73d/gutjnl-2017-314889f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b89/6352411/b2901e74bf7e/gutjnl-2017-314889f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b89/6352411/c795230271ee/gutjnl-2017-314889f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b89/6352411/207f1661d73d/gutjnl-2017-314889f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial.Endocuff Vision 提高腺瘤检出率:ADENOMA 随机对照试验。
Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):280-288. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
2
Cuff-assisted versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: results of a randomized study.带气囊辅助管与帽式辅助管结肠镜检查用于腺瘤检测的随机研究结果。
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):742-749. doi: 10.1055/a-0901-7306. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用内镜外套管对结肠镜检查结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 7;25(9):1158-1170. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1158.
4
Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy.随机对照试验:Endocuff 辅助结肠镜检查与透明帽辅助结肠镜检查在腺瘤检出率方面的比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;34(9):1492-1496. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14771. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
5
Adenoma and serrated lesion detection with distal attachment in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.结肠镜筛查中使用远端附件检测腺瘤和锯齿状病变:一项随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09049-5. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
6
Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Endocuff 结肠镜与常规结肠镜检查对腺瘤的检出率:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):438-445. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310097. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
7
Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT).内镜辅助套扎圈结肠切除术与帽辅助结肠切除术在腺瘤检测中的比较:随机串联研究——套扎圈-帽检测试验(DETECT)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Apr;91(4):894-904.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.046. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
8
Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme.全谱(FUSE)与标准前视结肠镜检查在有组织的结直肠癌筛查计划中的比较。
Gut. 2017 Nov;66(11):1949-1955. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311906. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
9
BowelScope: Accuracy of Detection Using Endocuff Optimisation of Mucosal Abnormalities (the B-ADENOMA Study): a multicentre, randomised controlled flexible sigmoidoscopy trial.BowelScope:使用 Endocuff 优化黏膜病变检测准确性(B-ADENOMA 研究):一项多中心、随机对照、灵活乙状结肠镜检查试验。
Gut. 2020 Nov;69(11):1959-1965. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319621. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
10
Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial.基于粪便潜血试验的英国结直肠癌筛查计划中,内镜黏膜下剥离(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)与标准结肠镜检查的比较:一项随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1043-1050. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111718. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining techniques and technologies increases adenoma detection rates in colonoscopy: More is more.结合技术与科技可提高结肠镜检查中腺瘤的检出率:越多越好。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Aug 16;17(8):107734. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.107734.
2
Improvement in Adenoma Detection Rate with Distal Attachment Device Endo-Wing™-Assisted Colonoscopy: A Randomized Control Trial.使用远端附件装置Endo-Wing™辅助结肠镜检查提高腺瘤检出率:一项随机对照试验
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 28;15(9):1126. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091126.
3
Development and external validation of a transfer learning-based system for the pathological diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a large emulated prospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial.基于粪便潜血试验的英国结直肠癌筛查计划中,内镜黏膜下剥离(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)与标准结肠镜检查的比较:一项随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1043-1050. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111718. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
2
Impact of a new distal attachment on colonoscopy performance in an academic screening center.新的远端附件对学术筛查中心结肠镜检查性能的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
3
Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.
基于迁移学习的结直肠癌病理诊断系统的开发与外部验证:一项大型模拟前瞻性研究
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 25;14:1365364. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1365364. eCollection 2024.
4
Standard screening high-definition colonoscopy without any optimization device is no longer relevant: Time to move to optimized screening colonoscopy.没有任何优化设备的标准筛查高清结肠镜检查已不再适用:是时候转向优化的筛查结肠镜检查了。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Mar 28;12(3):E463-E466. doi: 10.1055/a-2280-7096. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Linked-color imaging with or without artificial intelligence for adenoma detection: a randomized trial.采用或不采用人工智能的联合同色成像用于腺瘤检测:一项随机试验
Endoscopy. 2024 May;56(5):376-383. doi: 10.1055/a-2239-8145. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
6
Patients' experience of using colonoscopy as a diagnostic test after a positive FOBT/FIT: a systematic review of the quantitative literature.患者使用结肠镜检查作为阳性 FOBT/FIT 后诊断测试的体验:定量文献的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e071391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071391.
7
Texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) plus endocuff vision versus TXI alone for colorectal adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial.纹理和色彩增强成像(TXI)联合内镜黏膜切除术与单独 TXI 对结直肠腺瘤检测的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8340-8348. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10396-0. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
8
Effect of add-on devices with projections on screening colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.带突起附加装置对结肠镜筛查的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep-Oct;36(5):533-540. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0820. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
9
Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review.图像增强结肠镜检查:最新进展与前景——综述
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul 25;8:26. doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-17. eCollection 2023.
10
Quality in colonoscopy: time to ensure national standards are implemented?结肠镜检查的质量:是时候确保国家标准得到实施了吗?
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 May 26;14(5):392-398. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102371. eCollection 2023.
帽袖辅助结肠镜检查与标准结肠镜检查对腺瘤检测的比较:一项随机背靠背研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
4
Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.结肠镜检查关键性能指标的专家意见和科学证据。
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):2045-2060. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312043. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
5
UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.英国结肠镜检查的关键绩效指标和质量保证标准。
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):1923-1929. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312044. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
6
The ADENOMA Study. Accuracy of Detection using Endocuff Vision™ Optimization of Mucosal Abnormalities: study protocol for randomized controlled trial.腺瘤研究。使用Endocuff Vision™检测黏膜异常的准确性:随机对照试验的研究方案。
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Feb;4(2):E205-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107900. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
7
Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Endocuff 结肠镜与常规结肠镜检查对腺瘤的检出率:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):438-445. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310097. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
8
Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial.使用内镜套辅助结肠镜检查提高腺瘤检出率——一项随机对照多中心试验
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114267. eCollection 2014.
9
Implementing a national flexible sigmoidoscopy screening program: results of the English early pilot.实施全国性的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查项目:英国早期试点结果
Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):225-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1378119. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
10
What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.何种程度的肠道准备质量需要早期重复结肠镜检查:准备质量对腺瘤检出率影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.232. Epub 2014 Aug 19.