Suppr超能文献

基于粪便潜血试验的英国结直肠癌筛查计划中,内镜黏膜下剥离(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)与标准结肠镜检查的比较:一项随机试验。

Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial.

机构信息

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1043-1050. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111718. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

Abstract

Up to 25 % colorectal adenomas are missed during colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the endocuff could improve polyp detection in an organized bowel cancer screening program (BCSP).  This parallel group, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial included patients with positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) who were attending for BCSP colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the number of polyps per patient. Secondary outcomes included the number of adenomas per patient, adenoma and polyp detection rates, and withdrawal times.  A total of 534 BCSP patients were randomized to endocuff-assisted or standard colonoscopy. The mean age was 67 years and the male to female ratio was 1.8:1. We detected no significant difference in the number of polyps per patient (standard 1.8, endocuff 1.6;  = 0.44), adenomas per patient (standard 1.4, endocuff 1.3;  = 0.54), polyp detection rate (standard 69.8 %, endocuff 70.3 %;  = 0.93), adenoma detection rate (standard 63.0 %, endocuff 60.9 %;  = 0.85), advanced adenoma detection rate (standard 18.5 %, endocuff 16.9 %;  = 0.81), and cancer detection rate (standard 5.7 %, endocuff 5.3 %;  = 0.85). The mean withdrawal time was significantly shorter among patients in the endocuff group compared with the standard colonoscopy group (16.9 vs. 19.5 minutes;  < 0.005). The endocuff had to be removed in 17/266 patients (6.4 %) because of inability to pass through the sigmoid colon. This study did not find improved polyp or adenoma detection with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in the FOBT-positive BCSP population. A shorter withdrawal time with endocuff may reflect improved views and stability provided by the endocuff.Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02529007).

摘要

在结肠镜检查中,多达 25%的结直肠腺瘤会被遗漏。本研究旨在探讨内镜外套管是否能提高组织良好的结直肠癌筛查计划(BCSP)中的息肉检出率。这项平行组、单盲、随机对照试验纳入了接受 BCSP 结肠镜检查的粪便潜血试验(FOBT)阳性患者。主要结局是每位患者的息肉数量。次要结局包括每位患者的腺瘤数量、腺瘤和息肉检出率以及退镜时间。共有 534 例 BCSP 患者被随机分为内镜外套管辅助组或标准结肠镜组。患者平均年龄为 67 岁,男女比例为 1.8:1。我们未发现每位患者的息肉数量(标准组 1.8 个,内镜外套管组 1.6 个;=0.44)、腺瘤数量(标准组 1.4 个,内镜外套管组 1.3 个;=0.54)、息肉检出率(标准组 69.8%,内镜外套管组 70.3%;=0.93)、腺瘤检出率(标准组 63.0%,内镜外套管组 60.9%;=0.85)、高级别腺瘤检出率(标准组 18.5%,内镜外套管组 16.9%;=0.81)和癌症检出率(标准组 5.7%,内镜外套管组 5.3%;=0.85)有显著差异。内镜外套管组的退镜时间明显短于标准结肠镜组(16.9 分钟比 19.5 分钟;<0.005)。由于无法通过乙状结肠,17/266 例(6.4%)患者需要取出内镜外套管。这项研究在 FOBT 阳性的 BCSP 人群中未发现内镜外套管辅助结肠镜检查能提高息肉或腺瘤的检出率。内镜外套管可能通过提供更好的视野和稳定性,使退镜时间缩短。该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT02529007)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验