Thow Anne Marie, Jones Alexandra, Hawkes Corinna, Ali Iqra, Labonté Ronald
Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Centre for Food Policy, City University London, UK.
Health Promot Int. 2018 Aug 1;33(4):561-571. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw109.
Interpretive nutrition labels provide simplified nutrient-specific text and/or symbols on the front of pre-packaged foods, to encourage and enable consumers to make healthier choices. This type of labelling has been proposed as part of a comprehensive policy response to the global epidemic of non-communicable diseases. However, regulation of nutrition labelling falls under the remit of not just the health sector but also trade. Specific Trade Concerns have been raised at the World Trade Organization's Technical Barriers to Trade Committee regarding interpretive nutrition labelling initiatives in Thailand, Chile, Indonesia, Peru and Ecuador. This paper presents an analysis of the discussions of these concerns. Although nutrition labelling was identified as a legitimate policy objective, queries were raised regarding the justification of the specific labelling measures proposed, and the scientific evidence for effectiveness of such measures. Concerns were also raised regarding the consistency of the measures with international standards. Drawing on policy learning theory, we identified four lessons for public health policy makers, including: strategic framing of nutrition labelling policy objectives; pro-active policy engagement between trade and health to identify potential trade issues; identifying ways to minimize potential 'practical' trade concerns; and engagement with the Codex Alimentarius Commission to develop international guidance on interpretative labelling. This analysis indicates that while there is potential for trade sector concerns to stifle innovation in nutrition labelling policy, care in how interpretive nutrition labelling measures are crafted in light of trade commitments can minimize such a risk and help ensure that trade policy is coherent with nutrition action.
解释性营养标签在预包装食品的正面提供简化的特定营养素文本和/或符号,以鼓励并使消费者能够做出更健康的选择。这种标签类型已被提议作为应对全球非传染性疾病流行的综合政策措施的一部分。然而,营养标签的监管不仅属于卫生部门的职责范围,也涉及贸易领域。世界贸易组织贸易技术壁垒委员会已就泰国、智利、印度尼西亚、秘鲁和厄瓜多尔的解释性营养标签举措提出了具体贸易关切。本文对这些关切的讨论进行了分析。尽管营养标签被视为一项合理的政策目标,但对于所提议的具体标签措施的合理性以及此类措施有效性的科学证据仍存在疑问。此外,还对这些措施与国际标准的一致性表示关切。借鉴政策学习理论,我们为公共卫生政策制定者总结了四点经验教训,包括:对营养标签政策目标进行战略规划;贸易与卫生部门积极开展政策互动以识别潜在贸易问题;确定将潜在“实际”贸易关切降至最低的方法;以及与食品法典委员会合作制定关于解释性标签的国际指南。该分析表明,尽管贸易部门的关切有可能阻碍营养标签政策的创新,但根据贸易承诺精心制定解释性营养标签措施可以将这种风险降至最低,并有助于确保贸易政策与营养行动保持一致。