Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Global Health. 2020 Jan 3;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0533-3.
To respond to the global noncommunicable disease (NCD) crisis, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), a multilateral United Nations body responsible for work on food standards, is developing global guidance for front of pack (FoP) nutrition labelling. Guidance from Codex regarding FoP nutrition labelling at the global level will almost certainly influence national policy making. This shift in Codex's activities towards standards to address NCDs presents new risks for achievement of public health goals, as a result of the high level of industry involvement in this forum; there is a potential commercial conflict of interest held by manufacturers of products whose consumption could be discouraged by such guidance. In this Commentary, we examine the implications of Codex processes for developing robust global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling and identify opportunities to increase consideration of public health objectives. To date, there has been significantly higher representation of food industry compared to public health actors in Codex discussions on FoP nutrition labelling. Without a strong public health voice in Codex, the industry voice could dominate discussions on FoP nutrition labelling, such that subsequent global guidance prioritises future trade and profits over potential risks to public health. There is currently a critical window of opportunity for public health interests to be prioritised in this multisectoral international forum. The key public health priority for global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling is to ensure protection of policy space for national governments to implement strong and effective regulation, and allow scope for innovation. Public health actors can engage directly with Codex processes, at both the national and global level, and also need to raise awareness among domestic policy makers - including with Ministries of Agriculture and Industry, which often represent countries at Codex - regarding the importance and effectiveness of FoP labelling in NCD prevention. Increased engagement with Codex processes represents a tangible new opportunity to strengthen global governance for public health, and move towards improved coherence between trade policy and health protection goals.
为应对全球非传染性疾病(NCD)危机,负责制定食品标准的联合国多边机构食品法典委员会(Codex)正在制定全球范围内的包装正面营养标签指南。Codex 就全球范围内的包装正面营养标签提供的指导意见几乎肯定会影响国家政策制定。Codex 将其活动转向针对 NCD 的标准制定,这给实现公共卫生目标带来了新的风险,因为该论坛中行业参与度很高;此类指导意见可能会抑制某些产品的消费,而这些产品的制造商则存在潜在的商业利益冲突。在本评论中,我们探讨了 Codex 制定有关包装正面营养标签的稳健全球指南的过程所产生的影响,并确定了增加对公共卫生目标的考虑的机会。迄今为止,在 Codex 有关包装正面营养标签的讨论中,食品行业的代表人数明显高于公共卫生行为者。如果 Codex 中没有强大的公共卫生声音,那么行业的声音可能会主导包装正面营养标签的讨论,从而使随后的全球指导意见将未来的贸易和利润置于对公共卫生的潜在风险之上。目前,在这个多部门国际论坛中,优先考虑公共卫生利益的机会窗口非常关键。全球包装正面营养标签指南的关键公共卫生优先事项是确保保护各国政府实施强有力和有效的监管的政策空间,并为创新留出空间。公共卫生行为者可以直接参与国家和全球各级的 Codex 进程,还需要提高国内决策者(包括代表各国参加 Codex 的农业部和工业部的决策者)对包装正面标签在 NCD 预防中的重要性和有效性的认识。加强与 Codex 进程的接触代表着一个新的切实机会,可以加强公共卫生的全球治理,并朝着改善贸易政策与卫生保护目标之间的一致性方向发展。