Suppr超能文献

三种用于提高皮层兴奋性的非侵入性经颅电刺激方法的比较。

Comparison of Three Non-Invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Methods for Increasing Cortical Excitability.

作者信息

Inukai Yasuto, Saito Kei, Sasaki Ryoki, Tsuiki Shota, Miyaguchi Shota, Kojima Sho, Masaki Mitsuhiro, Otsuru Naofumi, Onishi Hideaki

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Niigata University of Health and WelfareNiigata, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and WelfareNiigata, Japan.

Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Dec 27;10:668. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00668. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a representative non-invasive brain stimulation method (NIBS). tDCS increases cortical excitability not only in healthy individuals, but also in stroke patients where it contributes to motor function improvement. Recently, two additional types of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) methods have been introduced that may also prove beneficial for stimulating cortical excitability; these are transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). However, comparison of tDCS with tRNS and tACS, in terms of efficacy in cortical excitability alteration, has not been reported thus far. We compared the efficacy of the three different tES methods for increasing cortical excitability using the same subject population and same current intensity. Fifteen healthy subjects participated in this study. Similar stimulation patterns (1.0 mA and 10 min) were used for the three conditions of stimulation (tDCS, tRNS, and tACS). Cortical excitability was explored via single-pulse TMS elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Compared with pre-measurements, MEPs significantly increased with tDCS, tACS, and tRNS ( < 0.05). Compared with sham measurements, significant increases in MEPs were also observed with tRNS and tACS ( < 0.05), but not with tDCS. In addition, a significant correlation of the mean stimulation effect was observed between tRNS and tACS ( = 0.019, = 0.598). tRNS induced a significant increase in MEP compared with the Pre or Sham at all time points. tRNS resulted in the largest significant increase in MEPs. These findings suggest that tRNS is the most effective tES method and should be considered as part of a treatment plan for improving motor function in stroke patients.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种典型的非侵入性脑刺激方法(NIBS)。tDCS不仅能增加健康个体的皮质兴奋性,还能改善中风患者的运动功能。最近,又引入了另外两种经颅电刺激(tES)方法,它们可能对刺激皮质兴奋性也有益处,即经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)和经颅交流电刺激(tACS)。然而,迄今为止,尚未有关于tDCS与tRNS和tACS在改变皮质兴奋性功效方面的比较报道。我们使用相同的受试者群体和相同的电流强度,比较了三种不同tES方法增加皮质兴奋性的功效。15名健康受试者参与了本研究。三种刺激条件(tDCS、tRNS和tACS)采用相似的刺激模式(1.0 mA,持续10分钟)。通过单脉冲TMS诱发的运动诱发电位(MEP)来探究皮质兴奋性。与预测量相比,tDCS、tACS和tRNS均使MEP显著增加(<0.05)。与假刺激测量相比,tRNS和tACS也使MEP显著增加(<0.05),但tDCS未出现这种情况。此外,观察到tRNS和tACS之间的平均刺激效果存在显著相关性(=0.019,=0.598)。与预刺激或假刺激相比,tRNS在所有时间点均使MEP显著增加。tRNS导致MEP的显著增加幅度最大。这些发现表明,tRNS是最有效的tES方法,应被视为改善中风患者运动功能治疗方案的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dad/5186778/1718bae54375/fnhum-10-00668-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验