Kovarik Pavel, Castiglia Virginia, Ivin Masa, Ebner Florian
Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Front Immunol. 2016 Dec 26;7:652. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00652. eCollection 2016.
Defense against bacterial infections requires activation of the immune response as well as timely reestablishment of tissue and immune homeostasis. Instauration of homeostasis is critical for tissue regeneration, wound healing, and host recovery. Recent studies revealed that severe infectious diseases frequently result from failures in homeostatic processes rather than from inefficient pathogen eradication. Type I interferons (IFN) appear to play a key role in such processes. Remarkably, the involvement of type I IFNs in the regulation of immune and tissue homeostasis upon bacterial insult may have beneficial or detrimental consequences for the host. The reasons for such ambivalent function of type I IFNs are not understood. The disparate effects of type I IFNs on bacterial infections are in marked contrast to their well-established protective roles in most viral infections. In this review, we will focus on type I IFN effector mechanisms which balance processes involved in immune and tissue homeostasis during specific bacterial infections and highlight the most important missing links in our understanding of type I IFN functions.
抵御细菌感染需要激活免疫反应以及及时重建组织和免疫稳态。稳态的恢复对于组织再生、伤口愈合和宿主恢复至关重要。最近的研究表明,严重的传染病往往是由于稳态过程失败,而非病原体清除效率低下所致。I型干扰素(IFN)似乎在此类过程中起关键作用。值得注意的是,细菌感染时I型干扰素参与免疫和组织稳态的调节,这对宿主可能产生有益或有害的影响。I型干扰素这种矛盾功能的原因尚不清楚。I型干扰素对细菌感染的不同影响与它们在大多数病毒感染中已确立的保护作用形成鲜明对比。在本综述中,我们将聚焦于I型干扰素效应机制,这些机制在特定细菌感染期间平衡免疫和组织稳态所涉及的过程,并突出我们对I型干扰素功能理解中最重要的缺失环节。