• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找圣杯:理解研究成功之道。

In Search of the Holy Grail: Understanding Research Success.

作者信息

Grant Jonathan, Wooding Steven

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2012 Dec 1;1(4):14. eCollection 2012 Winter.

PMID:28083221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4945263/
Abstract

This article considers the continuing challenges facing research funders when trying to allocate research money. It focuses on the area of research policy in mental health research funding, with a particular emphasis on funding for schizophrenia research, and provides an overview of research policy in the last 20-25 years. It then goes on to consider what approaches funders could take to build an evidence base to support future decisions about funding.

摘要

本文探讨了研究资助者在试图分配研究资金时面临的持续挑战。它聚焦于心理健康研究资助中的研究政策领域,尤其着重于精神分裂症研究的资助,并概述了过去20至25年的研究政策。接着,文章继续思考资助者可以采取哪些方法来建立证据基础,以支持未来有关资助的决策。

相似文献

1
In Search of the Holy Grail: Understanding Research Success.寻找圣杯:理解研究成功之道。
Rand Health Q. 2012 Dec 1;1(4):14. eCollection 2012 Winter.
2
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
3
How much is spent on mental health research: developing a system for categorising grant funding in the UK.英国在心理健康研究上投入了多少资金:建立一个英国资助资金分类系统。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 May;6(5):445-452. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30033-1. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
4
Noncommercial US Funders' Policies on Trial Registration, Access to Summary Results, and Individual Patient Data Availability.非商业性美国资助者的试验注册、摘要结果获取和个体患者数据可及性政策。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7498.
5
A Framework to Prioritise Health Research Proposals for Funding: Integrating Value for Money.制定健康研究提案资助优先级的框架:整合资金的价值。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Dec;17(6):761-770. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00495-2.
6
Consumer involvement in research projects: the activities of research funders.消费者参与研究项目:研究资助者的活动。
Health Policy. 2004 Aug;69(2):229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.011.
7
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders预防和治疗精神、神经及物质使用障碍的干预措施、政策和平台的成本效益及可负担性
8
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Pharmacological approaches to the prevention of restenosis following angioplasty. The search for the Holy Grail? (Part II).血管成形术后预防再狭窄的药理学方法。寻找圣杯?(第二部分)
Drugs. 1993 Aug;46(2):249-62. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199346020-00003.
10
Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded.消费者参与有关资助哪些与健康相关研究的决策。
Health Policy. 2004 Dec;70(3):281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.04.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the funding characteristics of research impact: A proof-of-concept study linking REF 2014 impact case studies with Researchfish grant agreements.理解研究影响力的资助特征:一项将2014年卓越研究框架(REF)影响力案例研究与Researchfish资助协议相联系的概念验证研究。
F1000Res. 2022 Sep 20;10:1291. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.74374.3. eCollection 2021.
2
Mental Health Retrosight: Understanding the Returns From Research (Lessons From Schizophrenia): Policy Report.心理健康回顾:理解研究回报(精神分裂症的经验教训):政策报告
Rand Health Q. 2014 Mar 1;4(1):8. eCollection 2014 Spring.
3
Project Retrosight: Understanding the Returns from Cardiovascular and Stroke Research: The Policy Report.项目回顾:了解心血管与中风研究的回报:政策报告
Rand Health Q. 2011 Mar 1;1(1):16. eCollection 2011 Spring.
4
Understanding factors associated with the translation of cardiovascular research: a multinational case study approach.理解与心血管研究翻译相关的因素:一种多国案例研究方法。
Implement Sci. 2014 Apr 21;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-47.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicine. Life cycle of translational research for medical interventions.医学。医学干预的转化研究生命周期。
Science. 2008 Sep 5;321(5894):1298-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1160622.
2
Applying the institute of medicine quality chasm framework to improving health care for mental and substance use conditions.应用医学研究所质量鸿沟框架改善精神和物质使用状况的医疗服务。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2008 Mar;31(1):43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2007.11.002.
3
A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia.精神分裂症患病率的系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2005 May;2(5):e141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020141. Epub 2005 May 31.
4
Academic medicine: time for reinvention: research needs researching.学术医学:重塑时机已至:研究本身也需要研究。
BMJ. 2004 Jan 3;328(7430):48; discussion 49. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.48-a.
5
Measuring the social impact of research.衡量研究的社会影响。
BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):528. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.528.