• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Monopolar Transurethral Enucleation of Prostatic Adenoma: Preliminary Report.

作者信息

Pansadoro Vito, Emiliozzi Paolo, Del Vecchio Gianluca, Martini Marco, Scarpone Paolo, Del Giudice Francesco, Veneziano Domenico, Brassetti Aldo, Assenmacher Christophe

机构信息

Laparoscopic and Oncological Urology Centre, Fondazione Vincenzo Pansadoro, "Pio IX" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Department of Urology, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Urology. 2017 Apr;102:252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.024. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.024
PMID:28087281
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe preliminary results of our monopolar transurethral enucleation of prostatic adenoma (mTUEPA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of male patients treated with mTUEPA, a retrograde enucleation of the prostatic adenoma performed by means of a standard monopolar resectoscope, were prospectively enrolled. Symptoms, uroflowmetry parameters, and post-voiding residual were assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Prostate volume was evaluated at baseline by means of transrectal ultrasound. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs were stopped at least 1 week before the operation.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Mean preoperative prostate volume was 64.9 ± 28.5 g. When assessed at baseline, the mean total International Prostatic Symptoms Score was 15.2 ± 3.9, peak flow rate (Qmax) was 8.4 ± 2.9 mL/s and the post-voiding residual was 103.2 ± 90.6 mL. Four weeks after surgery, patients reported a mean International Prostatic Symptoms Score of 5.3 ± 3. This lower urinary tract symptoms relief was further maintained at 6 and 12 months after surgery. A significant postoperative improvement in uroflowmetry parameters was described, being the 6 and 12 months mean Qmax of 23.4 ± 10.6 mL/s and 18.8 ± 9.2 mL/s, respectively (P < .001). Overall, 14 postoperative complications were reported by 13 of 47 (27.6%) patients: most of them were minor complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II), whereas 1 patient reported capsule perforation during surgery, requiring interruption of the procedure and its further completion (Clavien-Dindo IIIb).

CONCLUSION

mTUEPA is a safe and effective technique, merging the principles of laser enucleation and the advantages of mechanical enucleation with standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate equipment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Monopolar Transurethral Enucleation of Prostatic Adenoma: Preliminary Report.
Urology. 2017 Apr;102:252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.024. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
2
Comparative randomized study on the efficaciousness of endoscopic bipolar prostate resection versus monopolar resection technique. 3 year follow-up.内镜下双极前列腺切除术与单极切除术技术疗效的比较随机研究。3年随访。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013 Jun 24;85(2):86-91. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.2.86.
3
Feasibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for recurrent/residual benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)治疗复发性/残留良性前列腺增生(BPH)的可行性。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E845-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11290.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
4
One-year Surgical Outcomes of Complete or Incomplete Enucleation of Prostate by Monopolar Electrocoagulation, Photoselective Vapoenucleation of 120-W GreenLight Laser, and Holmium Laser.经单极电凝、120瓦绿激光选择性光汽化及钬激光进行前列腺完全或不完全摘除术的一年手术结果
Urology. 2017 Oct;108:142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Holmium laser enucleation versus photoselective vaporization for prostatic adenoma greater than 60 ml: preliminary results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.钬激光前列腺剜除术与选择性光汽化术治疗前列腺体积大于 60ml 的良性前列腺增生症:一项前瞻性、随机临床试验的初步结果。
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2576. Epub 2012 May 15.
6
Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia cases - a medium term, prospective, randomized comparison.经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术与开放性前列腺切除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生症的中期前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):793-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11730.x. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
7
A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands (40 to 200 grams).一项随机试验,比较钬激光前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗大腺体(40至200克)良性前列腺增生继发膀胱出口梗阻的疗效。
J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1270-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000086948.55973.00.
8
Usage of GreenLight HPS 180-W laser vaporisation for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.使用绿激光HPS 180-W激光汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生症。
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2014;61(1):57-61.
9
Low-pressure monopolar electroresection of the prostate for glands sized > 70 vs. < 70 cc performed with continuous irrigation and suprapubic suction: perioperative and long-term outcome.低压单极前列腺电切术治疗体积>70 与体积<70cc 的前列腺:持续灌洗与耻骨上吸引的围手术期和长期疗效比较。
World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):449-457. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2162-x. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
10
Holmium:YAG transurethral incision versus laser photoselective vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia in a small prostate.钬激光经尿道前列腺切开术与激光光选择性汽化术治疗小前列腺良性前列腺增生的比较。
J Urol. 2014 Jan;191(1):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.113. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Monopolar Transurethral Enucleoresection of Prostate: Feasibility of Modified Nesbit's Enucleoresection with Apical Release.经尿道前列腺单极剜除术:改良Nesbit法前列腺剜除术并尖部松解的可行性
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 2;13(5):1455. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051455.
2
Monopolar enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for small- and medium-sized (< 80 cc) benign prostate hyperplasia: a prospective analysis.经尿道前列腺切除术与单极前列腺切除术治疗小至中等大小(<80 cc)良性前列腺增生症的前瞻性分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):167-173. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02757-z. Epub 2019 Apr 8.