Toki Maria I, Cecchi Fabiola, Hembrough Todd, Syrigos Konstantinos N, Rimm David L
Department of Pathology, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nantomics Inc., Rockville, MD, USA.
Lab Invest. 2017 Mar;97(3):329-334. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2016.148. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
Protein expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded patient tissue is routinely measured by Immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, IHC has been shown to be subject to variability in sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility, and is generally, at best, considered semi-quantitative. Mass spectrometry (MS) is considered by many to be the criterion standard for protein measurement, offering high sensitivity, specificity, and objective molecular quantification. Here, we seek to show that quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) with standardization can achieve quantitative results comparable to MS. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was measured by quantitative immunofluorescence in 15 cell lines with a wide range of EGFR expression, using different primary antibody concentrations, including the optimal signal-to-noise concentration after quantitative titration. QIF target measurement was then compared to the absolute EGFR concentration measured by Liquid Tissue-selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. The best agreement between the two assays was found when the EGFR primary antibody was used at the optimal signal-to-noise concentration, revealing a strong linear regression (R=0.88). This demonstrates that quantitative optimization of titration by calculation of signal-to-noise ratio allows QIF to be standardized to MS and can therefore be used to assess absolute protein concentration in a linear and reproducible manner.
免疫组织化学(IHC)常用于检测福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋患者组织中的蛋白质表达。然而,已有研究表明,免疫组织化学在敏感性、特异性和可重复性方面存在差异,一般最多只能算是半定量检测。许多人认为质谱分析法(MS)是蛋白质检测的标准方法,具有高敏感性、特异性和客观的分子定量能力。在此,我们试图证明标准化的定量免疫荧光法(QIF)能够获得与质谱分析法相当的定量结果。我们使用不同的一抗浓度,包括定量滴定后的最佳信噪比浓度,通过定量免疫荧光法检测了15种表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)表达水平差异较大的细胞系中的EGFR。然后将定量免疫荧光法的检测结果与通过液相组织选择反应监测质谱法测得的EGFR绝对浓度进行比较。当EGFR一抗使用最佳信噪比浓度时,两种检测方法的一致性最佳,呈现出较强的线性回归关系(R = 0.88)。这表明,通过计算信噪比进行滴定的定量优化可使定量免疫荧光法与质谱分析法实现标准化,从而能够以线性且可重复的方式评估蛋白质的绝对浓度。