• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间至关重要:利用当前吸烟者对与吸烟相关的健康风险的时间距离的既有认知来构建反吸烟信息。

Time Matters: Framing Antismoking Messages Using Current Smokers' Preexisting Perceptions of Temporal Distance to Smoking-Related Health Risks.

机构信息

a Department of Mass Communication & Communication Studies , Towson University.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2018 Mar;33(3):338-348. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1266579. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2016.1266579
PMID:28095028
Abstract

This study examined the effects of temporal framing used in messages about the future likelihood of developing smoking-related diseases on intention to quit smoking. Based on construal level theory (CLT), a causal model delineating the relationships among four variables-perceived temporal distance, personal relevance, perceived susceptibility, and behavioral intention-was proposed. The model was validated by an online experiment with a sample of 222 current smokers, revealing the effects of perceived temporal distance on behavioral intention via personal relevance and perceived susceptibility. Following the CLT-grounded model, the effects of different temporal frames (near future vs. distant future) on the four variables were tested. The near-future frame featured a risk perceived to be more temporally proximal (i.e., heart attack), and the distant-future frame featured a risk perceived to be more temporally distant (i.e., larynx cancer) among current smokers. Participants exposed to the near-future frame reported significantly shorter perceived temporal distance, greater personal relevance and perceived susceptibility to the risk portrayed in the message, and greater intention to quit smoking than participants exposed to the distant-future frame. Implications for antismoking communications are discussed.

摘要

本研究考察了关于未来罹患与吸烟相关疾病可能性的信息中所使用的时间框架对戒烟意愿的影响。基于构念水平理论(CLT),提出了一个因果模型,描述了四个变量——感知时间距离、个人相关性、感知易感性和行为意图之间的关系。该模型通过对 222 名当前吸烟者的在线实验进行验证,揭示了感知时间距离通过个人相关性和感知易感性对行为意图的影响。根据 CLT 理论模型,测试了不同时间框架(近期和远期)对这四个变量的影响。近期框架所呈现的风险被认为在时间上更近(即心脏病发作),而远期框架所呈现的风险被认为在时间上更远(即喉癌)。与接触远期框架的参与者相比,接触近期框架的参与者报告的感知时间距离更短、对信息中描述的风险的个人相关性和感知易感性更高,戒烟意愿也更强。讨论了对反吸烟传播的启示。

相似文献

1
Time Matters: Framing Antismoking Messages Using Current Smokers' Preexisting Perceptions of Temporal Distance to Smoking-Related Health Risks.时间至关重要:利用当前吸烟者对与吸烟相关的健康风险的时间距离的既有认知来构建反吸烟信息。
Health Commun. 2018 Mar;33(3):338-348. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1266579. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
2
Effects of Temporal Framing on Response to Antismoking Messages: The Mediating Role of Perceived Relevance.时间框架对反吸烟信息反应的影响:感知相关性的中介作用。
J Health Commun. 2017 Jan;22(1):37-44. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1250844. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
3
The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages.信息框架、戒烟意愿和尼古丁依赖对戒烟信息说服力的影响。
Addict Behav. 2008 Oct;33(10):1267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.05.010. Epub 2008 May 24.
4
The Effect of Temporal Frames in Anti-Smoking Messages on the Extension of Anti-Smoking Arguments to Smokers.吸烟有害健康警示语的时间框架对吸烟者延伸反吸烟论点的影响。
J Health Commun. 2020 May 3;25(5):421-429. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1778820. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
Control perceptions moderate attitudinal and normative effects on intention to quit smoking.控制认知调节了态度和规范对戒烟意愿的影响。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Dec;28(4):1153-61. doi: 10.1037/a0037924. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
6
Short and Sweet: The Persuasive Effects of Message Framing and Temporal Context in Antismoking Warning Labels.简明扼要:反吸烟警示标签中信息框架和时间背景的说服效果
J Health Commun. 2017 Jan;22(1):20-28. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1247484. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
7
Effects of smoking cues and argument strength of antismoking advertisements on former smokers' self-efficacy, attitude, and intention to refrain from smoking.吸烟线索和反吸烟广告论点力度对戒烟者戒烟自我效能、态度和意愿的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Feb;15(2):527-33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts171. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
8
Examining the impact of perceived psychological distances of quitting and continuing tobacco smoking on antismoking intention: a cross-sectional study.考察戒烟和继续吸烟的感知心理距离对戒烟意愿的影响:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):22993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50440-6.
9
Friends Don't Let Friends Smoke: How Storytelling and Social Distance Influence Nonsmokers' Responses to Antismoking Messages.朋友,别让朋友吸烟:叙事与社交距离如何影响非吸烟者对禁烟信息的反应。
Health Commun. 2018 Jul;33(7):887-895. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1321162. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
10
The impact of content, frame and social identity on the effectiveness of smoking cessation messages in urban young adults.内容、框架和社会身份对城市青年戒烟信息效果的影响。
J Prev Interv Community. 2019 Jul-Sep;47(3):214-227. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1603677. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of temporal framing of breast cancer risk on perceptions of and motivations to engage with information about early diagnosis: Evidence from an online experiment.乳腺癌风险的时间框架对早期诊断信息认知及获取动机的影响:来自一项在线实验的证据
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0320245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320245. eCollection 2025.
2
Young Adults' Knowledge and Perceptions of Permanent Noise-Induced Tinnitus and its Influence on Behavioural Intentions.年轻人对永久性噪声性耳鸣的知识和认知及其对行为意向的影响。
Noise Health. 2023 Oct-Dec;25(119):236-246. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_17_23.
3
Examining the impact of perceived psychological distances of quitting and continuing tobacco smoking on antismoking intention: a cross-sectional study.
考察戒烟和继续吸烟的感知心理距离对戒烟意愿的影响:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):22993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50440-6.
4
Highlighting COVID-19 racial disparities can reduce support for safety precautions among White U.S. residents.强调 COVID-19 中的种族差异可能会减少美国白人对安全预防措施的支持。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114951. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114951. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
5
Thinking about time: identifying prospective temporal illusions and their consequences.思考时间:识别预期的时间错觉及其后果。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 16;7(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00368-8.