• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌风险的时间框架对早期诊断信息认知及获取动机的影响:来自一项在线实验的证据

The impact of temporal framing of breast cancer risk on perceptions of and motivations to engage with information about early diagnosis: Evidence from an online experiment.

作者信息

Stoffel Sandro Tiziano, Natale Camilla, von Wagner Christian

机构信息

Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.

Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0320245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320245. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0320245
PMID:40138308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11940651/
Abstract

This study investigates the application of Construal Level Theory (CLT) to grasp how individuals perceive and respond to breast cancer risk in both near and distant future scenarios. Employing a two-stage methodology, we initially conducted a preliminary survey with 201 women aged 40 to 50, evaluating their perceptions of various phrasings of breast cancer risk information, including '1 in x', 'x% of', and 'x-y% probability'. Subsequently, an online experiment involving 1052 women in the same age group explored the influence of temporal framing on perceived risk and intentions for breast self-checks. We selected the most understandable, imaginable, and motivational phrasing from the preliminary survey for the experiment. The participants were divided into two groups: near-future framing (N = 526) and distant-future framing of developing breast cancer (N = 526). Study 1 revealed that women found the '1 in x' framing to be the easiest to understand, imagine, and most motivational. However, the subsequent experiment (Study 2) did not find any significant effects of temporal framing on women's perceived risk of developing breast cancer, perceived importance of self-checks, intention to conduct self-checks, or interest in learning more about self-checks. Nonetheless, it was noteworthy that individuals exposed to near-future framing perceived their risk as closer in time compared to those presented with distant-future framing (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.15-1.77 p = 0.001; aOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.14-1.76; p = 0.002). In conclusion, our study found that temporal distance of breast cancer risk doesn't affect risk perception or information-seeking behaviour, suggesting a focus on clear, motivational risk communication rather than temporal framing alone.

摘要

本研究探讨了建构水平理论(CLT)的应用,以了解个体在近期和远期未来情景中如何感知和应对乳腺癌风险。我们采用两阶段方法,首先对201名年龄在40至50岁之间的女性进行了初步调查,评估她们对乳腺癌风险信息不同表述方式的看法,包括“x分之一”、“x%的”和“x - y%的概率”。随后,一项针对1052名同年龄组女性的在线实验探讨了时间框架对感知风险和乳房自我检查意愿的影响。我们从初步调查中选择了最易懂、最具想象力且最具激励性的表述方式用于实验。参与者被分为两组:近期未来框架组(N = 526)和远期未来患乳腺癌框架组(N = 526)。研究结果表明,女性认为“x分之一”的表述方式最容易理解、想象且最具激励性。然而,后续实验(研究2)未发现时间框架对女性患乳腺癌的感知风险、自我检查的感知重要性、自我检查的意愿或了解更多自我检查信息的兴趣有任何显著影响。尽管如此,值得注意的是,与远期未来框架组相比,近期未来框架组的个体认为自己的风险在时间上更近(OR = 1.42,95% CI:1.15 - 1.77;p = 0.001;校正OR = 1.42,95% CI:1.14 - 1.76;p = 0.002)。总之,我们的研究发现乳腺癌风险的时间距离不会影响风险感知或信息寻求行为,这表明应注重清晰、具有激励性的风险沟通,而不仅仅是时间框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b8d/11940651/dd3af5c1c766/pone.0320245.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b8d/11940651/b2fd508e9b29/pone.0320245.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b8d/11940651/7b9e41e061f1/pone.0320245.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b8d/11940651/dd3af5c1c766/pone.0320245.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b8d/11940651/b2fd508e9b29/pone.0320245.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b8d/11940651/7b9e41e061f1/pone.0320245.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b8d/11940651/dd3af5c1c766/pone.0320245.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of temporal framing of breast cancer risk on perceptions of and motivations to engage with information about early diagnosis: Evidence from an online experiment.乳腺癌风险的时间框架对早期诊断信息认知及获取动机的影响:来自一项在线实验的证据
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0320245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320245. eCollection 2025.
2
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
3
Testing temporal frames of colorectal cancer risks: evidence from randomized online experiments.测试结直肠癌风险的时间框架:来自随机在线实验的证据。
Psychol Health Med. 2023 Feb;28(2):375-389. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2022.2061716. Epub 2022 May 29.
4
Investigating young women's motivations to engage in early mammography screening in Switzerland: results of a cross-sectional study.调查瑞士年轻女性进行早期乳房X光检查的动机:一项横断面研究的结果。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3180-1.
5
Time Matters: Framing Antismoking Messages Using Current Smokers' Preexisting Perceptions of Temporal Distance to Smoking-Related Health Risks.时间至关重要:利用当前吸烟者对与吸烟相关的健康风险的时间距离的既有认知来构建反吸烟信息。
Health Commun. 2018 Mar;33(3):338-348. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1266579. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
6
Effects of Message Framing on Cervical Cancer Screening Knowledge and Intentions Related to Primary HPV Testing.信息框架对 HPV 初筛相关的宫颈癌筛查知识和意向的影响。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Sep;14(9):839-844. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0622. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.先入之见影响女性对乳腺癌筛查信息的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 3;8:404. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1327-1.
8
Psychosocial Predictors of Breast Self-Examination among Female Students in Malaysia: A Study to Assess the Roles of Body Image, Self-efficacy and Perceived Barriers.马来西亚女学生乳房自我检查的心理社会预测因素:一项评估身体意象、自我效能感和感知障碍作用的研究
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(3):1277-84. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.3.1277.
9
Perceptions of Arab men regarding female breast cancer screening examinations-Findings from a Middle East study.阿拉伯男性对女性乳腺癌筛查检查的看法——一项中东研究的结果
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 21;12(7):e0180696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180696. eCollection 2017.
10
Danish Women Make Decisions about Participation in Breast Cancer Screening prior to Invitation Information: An Online Survey Using Experimental Methods.丹麦女性在收到邀请信息之前就决定参与乳腺癌筛查:一项使用实验方法的在线调查。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Aug;44(6):674-688. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241248142. Epub 2024 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing temporal frames of colorectal cancer risks: evidence from randomized online experiments.测试结直肠癌风险的时间框架:来自随机在线实验的证据。
Psychol Health Med. 2023 Feb;28(2):375-389. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2022.2061716. Epub 2022 May 29.
2
Present bias and health.当前偏差与健康。
J Risk Uncertain. 2018 Oct;57(2):177-198. doi: 10.1007/s11166-018-9289-z. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
3
Testing the decoy effect to increase interest in colorectal cancer screening.测试诱饵效应以提高对结直肠癌筛查的兴趣。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 26;14(3):e0213668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213668. eCollection 2019.
4
Time Matters: Framing Antismoking Messages Using Current Smokers' Preexisting Perceptions of Temporal Distance to Smoking-Related Health Risks.时间至关重要:利用当前吸烟者对与吸烟相关的健康风险的时间距离的既有认知来构建反吸烟信息。
Health Commun. 2018 Mar;33(3):338-348. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1266579. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
5
Does temporal discounting explain unhealthy behavior? A systematic review and reinforcement learning perspective.时间折扣能解释不健康行为吗?一项系统综述及强化学习视角
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar 12;8:76. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00076. eCollection 2014.
6
Validation of a measurement tool to assess awareness of breast cancer.评估乳腺癌意识的测量工具的验证。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 May;46(8):1374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.034. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
7
Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior.风险认知及其与风险行为的关系。
Ann Behav Med. 2004 Apr;27(2):125-30. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7.
8
The staircrase-method in psychophysics.心理物理学中的阶梯法。
Am J Psychol. 1962 Sep;75:485-91.
9
Temporal construal.时间构想
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):403-21. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403.
10
General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.高学历样本在算术量表上的总体表现。
Med Decis Making. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):37-44. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100105.