Stoffel Sandro Tiziano, Natale Camilla, von Wagner Christian
Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0320245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320245. eCollection 2025.
This study investigates the application of Construal Level Theory (CLT) to grasp how individuals perceive and respond to breast cancer risk in both near and distant future scenarios. Employing a two-stage methodology, we initially conducted a preliminary survey with 201 women aged 40 to 50, evaluating their perceptions of various phrasings of breast cancer risk information, including '1 in x', 'x% of', and 'x-y% probability'. Subsequently, an online experiment involving 1052 women in the same age group explored the influence of temporal framing on perceived risk and intentions for breast self-checks. We selected the most understandable, imaginable, and motivational phrasing from the preliminary survey for the experiment. The participants were divided into two groups: near-future framing (N = 526) and distant-future framing of developing breast cancer (N = 526). Study 1 revealed that women found the '1 in x' framing to be the easiest to understand, imagine, and most motivational. However, the subsequent experiment (Study 2) did not find any significant effects of temporal framing on women's perceived risk of developing breast cancer, perceived importance of self-checks, intention to conduct self-checks, or interest in learning more about self-checks. Nonetheless, it was noteworthy that individuals exposed to near-future framing perceived their risk as closer in time compared to those presented with distant-future framing (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.15-1.77 p = 0.001; aOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.14-1.76; p = 0.002). In conclusion, our study found that temporal distance of breast cancer risk doesn't affect risk perception or information-seeking behaviour, suggesting a focus on clear, motivational risk communication rather than temporal framing alone.
本研究探讨了建构水平理论(CLT)的应用,以了解个体在近期和远期未来情景中如何感知和应对乳腺癌风险。我们采用两阶段方法,首先对201名年龄在40至50岁之间的女性进行了初步调查,评估她们对乳腺癌风险信息不同表述方式的看法,包括“x分之一”、“x%的”和“x - y%的概率”。随后,一项针对1052名同年龄组女性的在线实验探讨了时间框架对感知风险和乳房自我检查意愿的影响。我们从初步调查中选择了最易懂、最具想象力且最具激励性的表述方式用于实验。参与者被分为两组:近期未来框架组(N = 526)和远期未来患乳腺癌框架组(N = 526)。研究结果表明,女性认为“x分之一”的表述方式最容易理解、想象且最具激励性。然而,后续实验(研究2)未发现时间框架对女性患乳腺癌的感知风险、自我检查的感知重要性、自我检查的意愿或了解更多自我检查信息的兴趣有任何显著影响。尽管如此,值得注意的是,与远期未来框架组相比,近期未来框架组的个体认为自己的风险在时间上更近(OR = 1.42,95% CI:1.15 - 1.77;p = 0.001;校正OR = 1.42,95% CI:1.14 - 1.76;p = 0.002)。总之,我们的研究发现乳腺癌风险的时间距离不会影响风险感知或信息寻求行为,这表明应注重清晰、具有激励性的风险沟通,而不仅仅是时间框架。