• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸烟线索和反吸烟广告论点力度对戒烟者戒烟自我效能、态度和意愿的影响。

Effects of smoking cues and argument strength of antismoking advertisements on former smokers' self-efficacy, attitude, and intention to refrain from smoking.

机构信息

Center of Excellence in Cancer Communication Research, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Feb;15(2):527-33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts171. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/nts171
PMID:22949578
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3545718/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the impact of smoking cues employed in antismoking advertisements on former smokers. Previous findings indicate that visual smoking cues in antismoking advertisements with weak antismoking arguments can elicit smoking urges in smokers and undermine message effectiveness. This study extends these observations to former smokers asking whether smoking cues in antismoking advertisements influence former smokers' self-efficacy, attitudes, and intention to refrain from smoking, along with smoking urges and perceived message effectiveness.

METHODS

The study was a mixed 2 (smoking cues; present vs. absent) × 2 (argument strength [AS]; high vs. low) design where smoking cue was a between-subject factor and AS was a within-subject factor. Potential participants recruited via online ads were screened in a phone interview for their eligibility. A total of 105 former smokers (aged 21-65) participated in the study, which was conducted in a laboratory setting. Repeated measure ANOVA and MANOVA were used for the analyses.

RESULTS

The results showed that the presence of smoking cues in antismoking ads undermines former smokers' behavioral self-efficacy, attitude, and intention about smoking abstinence, which increased as AS for the ads increased. Former smokers' reports of smoking urge were not affected by smoking cues or AS. However, consistent with previous findings for smokers, the presence of cues weakened perceived message effectiveness of antismoking ads rated by former smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of smoking cues on former smokers' self-efficacy, attitude, and intention to refrain from smoking is problematic. Inclusion of smoking cues in antismoking ads should be undertaken only when accompanied by strong arguments.

摘要

引言

本研究考察了反吸烟广告中使用的吸烟线索对前吸烟者的影响。先前的研究结果表明,反吸烟广告中视觉吸烟线索与弱反吸烟论点结合,可能会引起吸烟者的吸烟欲望,从而破坏信息的有效性。本研究将这些观察结果扩展到前吸烟者身上,询问反吸烟广告中的吸烟线索是否会影响前吸烟者的戒烟自我效能感、态度和意图,以及吸烟欲望和感知到的信息有效性。

方法

该研究采用了 2(吸烟线索;存在与不存在)×2(论点强度[AS];高与低)的混合设计,其中吸烟线索是一个被试间因素,AS 是一个被试内因素。通过在线广告招募潜在参与者,并在电话访谈中筛选他们是否符合条件。共有 105 名年龄在 21-65 岁之间的前吸烟者参加了这项在实验室环境中进行的研究。重复测量方差分析和多元方差分析用于分析。

结果

结果表明,反吸烟广告中吸烟线索的存在会削弱前吸烟者关于戒烟的行为自我效能感、态度和意图,而广告的论点强度越高,这种削弱作用就越明显。前吸烟者的吸烟欲望报告不受吸烟线索或 AS 的影响。然而,与之前对吸烟者的研究结果一致,线索的存在削弱了前吸烟者对反吸烟广告的感知信息有效性的评价。

结论

吸烟线索对前吸烟者的戒烟自我效能感、态度和意图的影响是有问题的。只有在有强烈论点的情况下,才应在反吸烟广告中包含吸烟线索。

相似文献

1
Effects of smoking cues and argument strength of antismoking advertisements on former smokers' self-efficacy, attitude, and intention to refrain from smoking.吸烟线索和反吸烟广告论点力度对戒烟者戒烟自我效能、态度和意愿的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Feb;15(2):527-33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts171. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
2
The effect of smoking cues in antismoking advertisements on smoking urge and psychophysiological reactions.戒烟广告中的吸烟线索对吸烟冲动及心理生理反应的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Mar;11(3):254-61. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntn033. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
3
Distraction Effects of Smoking Cues in Antismoking Messages: Examining Resource Allocation to Message Processing as a Function of Smoking Cues and Argument Strength.反吸烟信息中吸烟线索的分心效应:检验作为吸烟线索和论据强度函数的信息处理资源分配情况。
Media Psychol. 2013;16(2):154-176. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2012.755454.
4
Antismoking Advertisements and Price Promotions and Their Association With the Urge to Smoke and Purchases in a Virtual Convenience Store: Randomized Experiment.反吸烟广告与价格促销及其与虚拟便利店中吸烟冲动和购买行为的关联:随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 23;21(10):e14143. doi: 10.2196/14143.
5
Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs.吸烟线索、论点强度和反吸烟 PSA 的感知效果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Apr;13(4):282-90. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq255. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
6
Association of Exposure to Court-Ordered Tobacco Industry Antismoking Advertisements With Intentions and Attempts to Quit Smoking Among US Adults.接触法庭命令的烟草业反吸烟广告与美国成年人戒烟意图和尝试的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209504. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9504.
7
Does Vaping in E-Cigarette Advertisements Affect Tobacco Smoking Urge, Intentions, and Perceptions in Daily, Intermittent, and Former Smokers?电子烟广告中的雾化是否会影响日常吸烟者、间歇性吸烟者和曾经吸烟者对吸烟的渴望、意图及认知?
Health Commun. 2016;31(1):129-38. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.993496. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
8
Craving effect of smoking cues in smoking and antismoking stimuli in light smokers.吸烟线索和戒烟刺激对轻度吸烟者吸烟渴求的影响。
Addict Behav. 2013 Oct;38(10):2492-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Effect of e-cigarette advertisements and antismoking messages on explicit and implicit attitudes towards tobacco and e-cigarette smoking in 18-65-year-olds: a randomised controlled study protocol.电子烟广告及反吸烟信息对18至65岁人群关于烟草和电子烟吸烟的显性及隐性态度的影响:一项随机对照研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e014361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014361.
10
Effects of message framing and visual-fear appeals on smoker responses to antismoking ads.信息框架和视觉恐惧诉求对吸烟者对抗吸烟广告反应的影响。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(6):647-55. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1012242. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Short-Form Videos to Get Clinical Trial Newcomers to Sign Up: Message-Testing Experiment.使用短视频让临床试验新手注册:信息测试实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 15;26:e49600. doi: 10.2196/49600.
2
Testing the influence of harm reduction messages on health risk attitudes, injunctive norms and perceived behavioral control.测试减少伤害信息对健康风险态度、规范约束和感知行为控制的影响。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Aug 18;20(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00846-2.
3
Improving rural White men's attitudes toward clinical trial messaging and participation: effects of framing, exemplars and trust.改善农村白人男性对临床试验信息传递和参与的态度:框架、范例和信任的影响。
Health Educ Res. 2022 Nov 21;37(6):476-494. doi: 10.1093/her/cyac026.
4
Overcoming Black Americans' Psychological and Cognitive Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: Effects of News Framing and Exemplars.克服非裔美国人参与临床试验的心理和认知障碍:新闻框架和范例的影响。
Health Commun. 2023 Dec;38(12):2663-2675. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2105619. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
5
Responses to e-cigarette health messages among young adult sexual minoritized women and nonbinary people assigned female at birth: Assessing the influence of message theme and format.针对年轻成年性少数女性和出生时被指定为女性的非二元性别人群的电子烟健康信息的反应:评估信息主题和格式的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Feb 1;231:109249. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109249. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
6
Comparing Smoking Cessation Interventions among Underserved Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic Trial Protocol.比较为肺癌筛查转诊的服务不足患者提供的戒烟干预措施:一项实用试验方案。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Feb;19(2):303-314. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202104-499SD.
7
Networked collective intelligence improves dissemination of scientific information regarding smoking risks.网络集体智慧提高了吸烟风险相关科学信息的传播。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0227813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227813. eCollection 2020.
8
Perceived Message Effectiveness Measures in Tobacco Education Campaigns: A Systematic Review.烟草教育活动中感知到的信息有效性测量:一项系统综述。
Commun Methods Meas. 2018;12(4):295-313. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2018.1483017. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
9
Effects of E-cigarette Advertising Message Form and Cues on Cessation Intention: An Exploratory Study.电子烟广告信息形式和线索对戒烟意愿的影响:一项探索性研究。
J Health Commun. 2019;24(5):570-580. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1639857. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
10
Characterizing Media Content and Effects of Organ Donation on a Social Media Platform: Content Analysis.在社交媒体平台上表征器官捐赠的媒体内容及影响:内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 12;21(3):e13058. doi: 10.2196/13058.

本文引用的文献

1
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.一种感知论证强度的度量:信度与效度。
Commun Methods Meas. 2011 Mar 4;5(1):48-75. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2010.547822.
2
Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs.吸烟线索、论点强度和反吸烟 PSA 的感知效果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Apr;13(4):282-90. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq255. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
3
The effect of marijuana scenes in anti-marijuana public service announcements on adolescents' evaluation of ad effectiveness.反大麻公益广告中的大麻场景对青少年广告效果评价的影响。
Health Commun. 2009 Sep;24(6):483-93. doi: 10.1080/10410230903104269.
4
The effect of smoking cues in antismoking advertisements on smoking urge and psychophysiological reactions.戒烟广告中的吸烟线索对吸烟冲动及心理生理反应的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Mar;11(3):254-61. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntn033. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
Evaluating social-cognitive mechanisms that regulate self-efficacy in response to provocative smoking cues: an experimental investigation.评估应对挑衅性吸烟线索时调节自我效能感的社会认知机制:一项实验研究。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;20(1):91-6. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.1.91.
6
Relapse to smoking.复吸
Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Mar;26(2):196-215. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.11.007. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
7
The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement.反吸烟广告执行特征对青少年理解、评价、回忆和参与度的影响。
J Health Commun. 2005 Mar;10(2):127-43. doi: 10.1080/10810730590915100.
8
Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk.吸烟者和曾经吸烟者对声称风险降低的香烟的反应。
Tob Control. 2004 Mar;13(1):78-84. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.005272.
9
Tobacco harm reduction: promise and perils.烟草危害降低:前景与风险。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2002;4 Suppl 2:S61-71. doi: 10.1080/1462220021000032825.
10
Have we lost our way? The need for dynamic formulations of smoking relapse proneness.我们是否迷失了方向?对吸烟复发倾向动态表述的需求。
Addiction. 2002 Sep;97(9):1093-108. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00216.x.