Goligher Ewan C, Ely E Wesley, Sulmasy Daniel P, Bakker Jan, Raphael John, Volandes Angelo E, Patel Bhavesh M, Payne Kate, Hosie Annmarie, Churchill Larry, White Douglas B, Downar James
1Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. 2Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. 4Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN. 5Center for Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN. 6Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN. 7Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 8Divinity School, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 9MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 10Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 11Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY. 12Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 13Department of Pastoral Care, St. Thomas West Hospital, Nashville, TN. 14Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 15Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ. 16Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 17Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN. 18School of Nursing, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 19Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia. 20Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 21Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Pittsburgh, PA. 22Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):149-155. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001818.
Many patients are admitted to the ICU at or near the end of their lives. Consequently, the increasingly common debate regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia holds implications for the practice of critical care medicine. The objective of this article is to explore core ethical issues related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia from the perspective of healthcare professionals and ethicists on both sides of the debate.
We identified four issues highlighting the key areas of ethical tension central to evaluating physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in medical practice: 1) the benefit or harm of death itself, 2) the relationship between physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia and withholding or withdrawing life support, 3) the morality of a physician deliberately causing death, and 4) the management of conscientious objection related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the critical care setting. We present areas of common ground and important unresolved differences.
We reached differing positions on the first three core ethical questions and achieved unanimity on how critical care clinicians should manage conscientious objections related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. The alternative positions presented in this article may serve to promote open and informed dialogue within the critical care community.
许多患者在生命末期或接近生命末期时被收入重症监护病房(ICU)。因此,关于医生协助自杀和安乐死的争论日益普遍,这对重症医学的实践产生了影响。本文的目的是从争论双方的医疗保健专业人员和伦理学家的角度探讨与医生协助自杀和安乐死相关的核心伦理问题。
我们确定了四个问题,这些问题突出了在医疗实践中评估医生协助自杀和安乐死时核心伦理紧张关系的关键领域:1)死亡本身的益处或危害;2)医生协助自杀和安乐死与停止或撤除生命支持之间的关系;3)医生故意导致死亡的道德性;4)在重症监护环境中与医生协助自杀和安乐死相关的良心反对的管理。我们展示了共同点和重要的未解决分歧。
我们在头三个核心伦理问题上达成了不同立场,在重症监护临床医生应如何处理与医生协助自杀和安乐死相关的良心反对方面达成了一致。本文提出的不同立场可能有助于促进重症监护领域内开放和明智的对话。