Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房中的医生协助自杀与安乐死:关于核心伦理问题的对话

Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in the ICU: A Dialogue on Core Ethical Issues.

作者信息

Goligher Ewan C, Ely E Wesley, Sulmasy Daniel P, Bakker Jan, Raphael John, Volandes Angelo E, Patel Bhavesh M, Payne Kate, Hosie Annmarie, Churchill Larry, White Douglas B, Downar James

机构信息

1Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. 2Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. 4Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN. 5Center for Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN. 6Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN. 7Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 8Divinity School, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 9MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 10Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 11Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY. 12Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 13Department of Pastoral Care, St. Thomas West Hospital, Nashville, TN. 14Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 15Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ. 16Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 17Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN. 18School of Nursing, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 19Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia. 20Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 21Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Pittsburgh, PA. 22Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):149-155. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001818.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many patients are admitted to the ICU at or near the end of their lives. Consequently, the increasingly common debate regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia holds implications for the practice of critical care medicine. The objective of this article is to explore core ethical issues related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia from the perspective of healthcare professionals and ethicists on both sides of the debate.

SYNTHESIS

We identified four issues highlighting the key areas of ethical tension central to evaluating physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in medical practice: 1) the benefit or harm of death itself, 2) the relationship between physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia and withholding or withdrawing life support, 3) the morality of a physician deliberately causing death, and 4) the management of conscientious objection related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the critical care setting. We present areas of common ground and important unresolved differences.

CONCLUSIONS

We reached differing positions on the first three core ethical questions and achieved unanimity on how critical care clinicians should manage conscientious objections related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. The alternative positions presented in this article may serve to promote open and informed dialogue within the critical care community.

摘要

目的

许多患者在生命末期或接近生命末期时被收入重症监护病房(ICU)。因此,关于医生协助自杀和安乐死的争论日益普遍,这对重症医学的实践产生了影响。本文的目的是从争论双方的医疗保健专业人员和伦理学家的角度探讨与医生协助自杀和安乐死相关的核心伦理问题。

综述

我们确定了四个问题,这些问题突出了在医疗实践中评估医生协助自杀和安乐死时核心伦理紧张关系的关键领域:1)死亡本身的益处或危害;2)医生协助自杀和安乐死与停止或撤除生命支持之间的关系;3)医生故意导致死亡的道德性;4)在重症监护环境中与医生协助自杀和安乐死相关的良心反对的管理。我们展示了共同点和重要的未解决分歧。

结论

我们在头三个核心伦理问题上达成了不同立场,在重症监护临床医生应如何处理与医生协助自杀和安乐死相关的良心反对方面达成了一致。本文提出的不同立场可能有助于促进重症监护领域内开放和明智的对话。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Euthanasia in Africa: A scoping review of empirical evidence.非洲的安乐死:实证证据的范围综述
Health Sci Rep. 2023 May 30;6(5):e1239. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1239. eCollection 2023 May.

本文引用的文献

5
Dying with dignity in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房尊严地离世。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 26;370(26):2506-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208795.
8
Physician assisted suicide: the great Canadian euthanasia debate.医生协助自杀:伟大的加拿大安乐死辩论。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013 Sep-Dec;36(5-6):522-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验