Delisle Nyström Christine, Henriksson Hanna, Alexandrou Christina, Bergström Anna, Bonn Stephanie, Bälter Katarina, Löf Marie
Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NOVUM, 14183 Huddinge, Sweden.
PROFITH "Promoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity" Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Nutrients. 2017 Jan 13;9(1):66. doi: 10.3390/nu9010066.
The development of easy-to-use and accurate methods to assess the intake of energy, foods and nutrients in pre-school children is needed. KidMeal-Q is an online food frequency questionnaire developed for the LifeGene prospective cohort study in Sweden. The aims of this study were to compare: (i) energy intake (EI) obtained using KidMeal-Q to total energy expenditure (TEE) measured via doubly labelled water and (ii) the intake of certain foods measured using KidMeal-Q to intakes acquired by means of 24 h dietary recalls in 38 children aged 5.5 years. The mean EI calculated using KidMeal-Q was statistically different ( < 0.001) from TEE (4670 ± 1430 kJ/24 h and 6070 ± 690 kJ/24 h, respectively). Significant correlations were observed for vegetables, fruit juice and candy between KidMeal-Q and 24 h dietary recalls. Only sweetened beverage consumption was significantly different in mean intake ( < 0.001), as measured by KidMeal-Q and 24 h dietary recalls. In conclusion, KidMeal-Q had a relatively short answering time and comparative validity to other food frequency questionnaires. However, its accuracy needs to be improved before it can be used in studies in pre-school children.
需要开发易于使用且准确的方法来评估学龄前儿童的能量、食物和营养素摄入量。KidMeal-Q是为瑞典的LifeGene前瞻性队列研究开发的在线食物频率问卷。本研究的目的是比较:(i)使用KidMeal-Q获得的能量摄入量(EI)与通过双标水测量的总能量消耗(TEE),以及(ii)使用KidMeal-Q测量的某些食物摄入量与通过24小时膳食回顾获得的38名五岁半儿童的摄入量。使用KidMeal-Q计算的平均EI与TEE在统计学上有差异(<0.001)(分别为4670±1430kJ/24小时和6070±690kJ/24小时)。在KidMeal-Q和24小时膳食回顾之间,观察到蔬菜、果汁和糖果有显著相关性。通过KidMeal-Q和24小时膳食回顾测量,仅甜味饮料的平均摄入量有显著差异(<0.001)。总之,KidMeal-Q的答题时间相对较短,并且与其他食物频率问卷相比具有相对效度。然而,在可用于学龄前儿童研究之前,其准确性仍需提高。