Suppr超能文献

老年高血压患者漏服氨氯地平和氯沙坦对血压的影响。

The effects of missed doses of amlodipine and losartan on blood pressure in older hypertensive patients.

作者信息

de Leeuw Peter W, Fagard Robert, Kroon Abraham A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Medicine, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2017 Jun;40(6):568-572. doi: 10.1038/hr.2016.190. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

Abstract

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study compared the efficacy of amlodipine and losartan in an older hypertensive population, focusing on therapeutic coverage in the case of missed doses. Following a 4-week, single-blind, placebo washout period, 211 patients were randomly assigned to receive either 5 mg of amlodipine once daily or 50 mg of losartan once daily. Doses were doubled after 6 weeks of treatment if the diastolic blood pressure exceeded 90 mm Hg. After the 12-week treatment period, patients received the placebo for 2 days (drug holiday) to simulate two missed doses of antihypertensive medication. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was conducted at the end of the placebo washout period (baseline), upon completion of the 12-week treatment period (steady state), and after the 2-day drug holiday. Amlodipine was more effective than losartan in reducing patients' 24-h ambulatory blood pressure at the steady-state sampling time. The increases in 24-h blood pressure during the drug holiday averaged 6±2/2±1 mm Hg (P<0.0001) in the amlodipine group and 3±2/2±1 mm Hg (P<0.0001) in the losartan group. The rise in systolic pressure was greater in patients on amlodipine than in those on losartan (P<0.0001). For diastolic pressure, the changes did not differ. Owing to the lower pressure during treatment, patients in the amlodipine group remained at a significantly lower blood pressure level after the 2-day drug holiday. Amlodipine was more effective than losartan in lowering blood pressure and in maintaining blood pressure control after two missed doses, and the difference was most significant for systolic blood pressure.

摘要

这项随机、双盲、平行组、多中心研究比较了氨氯地平和氯沙坦在老年高血压人群中的疗效,重点关注漏服药物情况下的治疗覆盖情况。在为期4周的单盲安慰剂洗脱期后,211名患者被随机分配,分别每日服用一次5毫克氨氯地平或每日服用一次50毫克氯沙坦。如果舒张压在治疗6周后超过90毫米汞柱,则剂量加倍。在为期12周的治疗期结束后,患者接受2天的安慰剂治疗(药物假期),以模拟漏服两次抗高血压药物的情况。在安慰剂洗脱期结束时(基线)、12周治疗期结束时(稳态)以及2天药物假期后,进行24小时动态血压监测。在稳态采样时,氨氯地平在降低患者24小时动态血压方面比氯沙坦更有效。在药物假期期间,氨氯地平组24小时血压平均升高6±2/2±1毫米汞柱(P<0.0001),氯沙坦组为3±2/2±1毫米汞柱(P<0.0001)。服用氨氯地平的患者收缩压升高幅度大于服用氯沙坦的患者(P<0.0001)。对于舒张压,变化无差异。由于治疗期间血压较低,氨氯地平组患者在2天药物假期后的血压水平仍显著较低。在漏服两次药物后,氨氯地平在降低血压和维持血压控制方面比氯沙坦更有效,且收缩压差异最为显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验