Suppr超能文献

法国复发性社区获得性艰难梭菌感染多种竞争策略管理的成本效益分析

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Competing Strategies for the Management of Multiple Recurrent Community-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection in France.

作者信息

Baro Emilie, Galperine Tatiana, Denies Fanette, Lannoy Damien, Lenne Xavier, Odou Pascal, Guery Benoit, Dervaux Benoit

机构信息

Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, EA 2694 - Santé Publique: Epidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France.

CHU Lille, Maladies Infectieuses, French Group of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (GFTF), Lille, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 19;12(1):e0170258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170258. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is characterized by high rates of recurrence, resulting in substantial health care costs. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of treatments for the management of second recurrence of community-onset CDI in France.

METHODS

We developed a decision-analytic simulation model to compare 5 treatments for the management of second recurrence of community-onset CDI: pulsed-tapered vancomycin, fidaxomicin, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) via colonoscopy, FMT via duodenal infusion, and FMT via enema. The model outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) among the 5 treatments. ICERs were interpreted using a willingness-to-pay threshold of €32,000/QALY. Uncertainty was evaluated through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Three strategies were on the efficiency frontier: pulsed-tapered vancomycin, FMT via enema, and FMT via colonoscopy, in order of increasing effectiveness. FMT via duodenal infusion and fidaxomicin were dominated (i.e. less effective and costlier) by FMT via colonoscopy and FMT via enema. FMT via enema compared with pulsed-tapered vancomycin had an ICER of €18,092/QALY. The ICER for FMT via colonoscopy versus FMT via enema was €73,653/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations showed that FMT via enema was the most cost-effective strategy in 58% of simulations and FMT via colonoscopy was favored in 19% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €32,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

FMT via enema is the most cost-effective initial strategy for the management of second recurrence of community-onset CDI at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €32,000/QALY.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的特点是复发率高,导致大量医疗费用。本研究的目的是分析法国社区获得性CDI二次复发治疗的成本效益。

方法

我们开发了一个决策分析模拟模型,以比较社区获得性CDI二次复发的5种治疗方法:脉冲递减万古霉素、非达霉素、结肠镜下粪便微生物群移植(FMT)、十二指肠灌注FMT和灌肠FMT。模型结果是增量成本效益比(ICER),以5种治疗方法中每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本表示。使用32000欧元/QALY的支付意愿阈值来解释ICER。通过确定性和概率敏感性分析评估不确定性。

结果

三种策略处于效率前沿:脉冲递减万古霉素、灌肠FMT和结肠镜下FMT,有效性依次增加。十二指肠灌注FMT和非达霉素被结肠镜下FMT和灌肠FMT主导(即效果较差且成本较高)。灌肠FMT与脉冲递减万古霉素相比,ICER为18092欧元/QALY。结肠镜下FMT与灌肠FMT的ICER为73653欧元/QALY。通过10000次蒙特卡洛模拟进行的概率敏感性分析表明,在32000欧元/QALY的支付意愿阈值下,灌肠FMT在58%的模拟中是最具成本效益的策略,19%的模拟中更倾向于结肠镜下FMT。

结论

在32000欧元/QALY的支付意愿阈值下,灌肠FMT是社区获得性CDI二次复发管理中最具成本效益的初始策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5567/5245822/e248fea2694a/pone.0170258.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验