Baro Emilie, Galperine Tatiana, Denies Fanette, Lannoy Damien, Lenne Xavier, Odou Pascal, Guery Benoit, Dervaux Benoit
Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, EA 2694 - Santé Publique: Epidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France.
CHU Lille, Maladies Infectieuses, French Group of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (GFTF), Lille, France.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 19;12(1):e0170258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170258. eCollection 2017.
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is characterized by high rates of recurrence, resulting in substantial health care costs. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of treatments for the management of second recurrence of community-onset CDI in France.
We developed a decision-analytic simulation model to compare 5 treatments for the management of second recurrence of community-onset CDI: pulsed-tapered vancomycin, fidaxomicin, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) via colonoscopy, FMT via duodenal infusion, and FMT via enema. The model outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) among the 5 treatments. ICERs were interpreted using a willingness-to-pay threshold of €32,000/QALY. Uncertainty was evaluated through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
Three strategies were on the efficiency frontier: pulsed-tapered vancomycin, FMT via enema, and FMT via colonoscopy, in order of increasing effectiveness. FMT via duodenal infusion and fidaxomicin were dominated (i.e. less effective and costlier) by FMT via colonoscopy and FMT via enema. FMT via enema compared with pulsed-tapered vancomycin had an ICER of €18,092/QALY. The ICER for FMT via colonoscopy versus FMT via enema was €73,653/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations showed that FMT via enema was the most cost-effective strategy in 58% of simulations and FMT via colonoscopy was favored in 19% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €32,000/QALY.
FMT via enema is the most cost-effective initial strategy for the management of second recurrence of community-onset CDI at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €32,000/QALY.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的特点是复发率高,导致大量医疗费用。本研究的目的是分析法国社区获得性CDI二次复发治疗的成本效益。
我们开发了一个决策分析模拟模型,以比较社区获得性CDI二次复发的5种治疗方法:脉冲递减万古霉素、非达霉素、结肠镜下粪便微生物群移植(FMT)、十二指肠灌注FMT和灌肠FMT。模型结果是增量成本效益比(ICER),以5种治疗方法中每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本表示。使用32000欧元/QALY的支付意愿阈值来解释ICER。通过确定性和概率敏感性分析评估不确定性。
三种策略处于效率前沿:脉冲递减万古霉素、灌肠FMT和结肠镜下FMT,有效性依次增加。十二指肠灌注FMT和非达霉素被结肠镜下FMT和灌肠FMT主导(即效果较差且成本较高)。灌肠FMT与脉冲递减万古霉素相比,ICER为18092欧元/QALY。结肠镜下FMT与灌肠FMT的ICER为73653欧元/QALY。通过10000次蒙特卡洛模拟进行的概率敏感性分析表明,在32000欧元/QALY的支付意愿阈值下,灌肠FMT在58%的模拟中是最具成本效益的策略,19%的模拟中更倾向于结肠镜下FMT。
在32000欧元/QALY的支付意愿阈值下,灌肠FMT是社区获得性CDI二次复发管理中最具成本效益的初始策略。