• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子医疗记录信息评估脊髓损伤退伍军人的压疮风险:一项纵向研究方案。

Leveraging Electronic Health Care Record Information to Measure Pressure Ulcer Risk in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Study Protocol.

作者信息

Luther Stephen L, Thomason Susan S, Sabharwal Sunil, Finch Dezon K, McCart James, Toyinbo Peter, Bouayad Lina, Matheny Michael E, Gobbel Glenn T, Powell-Cope Gail

机构信息

Center of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Health Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs, Tampa, FL, United States.

College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jan 19;6(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5948.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.5948
PMID:28104580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5290296/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers (PrUs) are a frequent, serious, and costly complication for veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI). The health care team should periodically identify PrU risk, although there is no tool in the literature that has been found to be reliable, valid, and sensitive enough to assess risk in this vulnerable population.

OBJECTIVE

The immediate goal is to develop a risk assessment model that validly estimates the probability of developing a PrU. The long-term goal is to assist veterans with SCI and their providers in preventing PrUs through an automated system of risk assessment integrated into the veteran's electronic health record (EHR).

METHODS

This 5-year longitudinal, retrospective, cohort study targets 12,344 veterans with SCI who were cared for in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in fiscal year (FY) 2009 and had no record of a PrU in the prior 12 months. Potential risk factors identified in the literature were reviewed by an expert panel that prioritized factors and determined if these were found in structured data or unstructured form in narrative clinical notes for FY 2009-2013. These data are from the VHA enterprise Corporate Data Warehouse that is derived from the EHR structured (ie, coded in database/table) or narrative (ie, text in clinical notes) data for FY 2009-2013.

RESULTS

This study is ongoing and final results are expected in 2017. Thus far, the expert panel reviewed the initial list of risk factors extracted from the literature; the panel recommended additions and omissions and provided insights about the format in which the documentation of the risk factors might exist in the EHR. This list was then iteratively refined through review and discussed with individual experts in the field. The cohort for the study was then identified, and all structured, unstructured, and semistructured data were extracted. Annotation schemas were developed, samples of documents were extracted, and annotations are ongoing. Operational definitions of structured data elements have been created and steps to create an analytic dataset are underway.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort employed to identify PrU risk factors in the United States. It also represents the first time natural language processing and statistical text mining will be used to expand the number of variables available for analysis. A major strength of this quantitative study is that all VHA SCI centers were included in the analysis, reducing potential for selection bias and providing increased power for complex statistical analyses. This longitudinal study will eventually result in a risk prediction tool to assess PrU risk that is reliable and valid, and that is sensitive to this vulnerable population.

摘要

背景

压疮是脊髓损伤(SCI)退伍军人中常见、严重且代价高昂的并发症。医疗团队应定期识别压疮风险,尽管文献中尚未发现有足够可靠、有效且敏感的工具来评估这一脆弱人群的风险。

目的

近期目标是开发一种风险评估模型,有效估计发生压疮的概率。长期目标是通过集成到退伍军人电子健康记录(EHR)中的自动化风险评估系统,协助SCI退伍军人及其医疗服务提供者预防压疮。

方法

这项为期5年的纵向、回顾性队列研究针对2009财年在退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)接受治疗且在过去12个月内无压疮记录的12344名SCI退伍军人。文献中确定的潜在风险因素由一个专家小组进行审查,该小组对因素进行了优先级排序,并确定这些因素在2009 - 2013财年的结构化数据或叙事性临床记录中的非结构化形式中是否存在。这些数据来自VHA企业数据仓库,该仓库源自2009 - 2013财年的EHR结构化(即数据库/表中编码)或叙事性(即临床记录中的文本)数据。

结果

本研究正在进行中,预计2017年得出最终结果。到目前为止,专家小组审查了从文献中提取的初始风险因素列表;该小组建议了增减内容,并提供了关于风险因素文档在EHR中可能存在的格式方面的见解。然后通过审查对该列表进行迭代完善,并与该领域的个别专家进行了讨论。随后确定了研究队列,并提取了所有结构化、非结构化和半结构化数据。开发了注释模式,提取了文档样本,注释工作正在进行中。已创建结构化数据元素的操作定义,创建分析数据集的步骤正在进行中。

结论

据我们所知,这是美国用于识别压疮风险因素的最大队列。它也是首次将自然语言处理和统计文本挖掘用于扩大可用于分析的变量数量。这项定量研究的一个主要优势是,所有VHA SCI中心都纳入了分析,减少了选择偏倚的可能性,并为复杂的统计分析提供了更大的效力。这项纵向研究最终将产生一种可靠、有效的压疮风险评估预测工具,且对这一脆弱人群敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab22/5290296/ebd3bb7be718/resprot_v6i1e3_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab22/5290296/ebd3bb7be718/resprot_v6i1e3_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab22/5290296/ebd3bb7be718/resprot_v6i1e3_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Leveraging Electronic Health Care Record Information to Measure Pressure Ulcer Risk in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Study Protocol.利用电子医疗记录信息评估脊髓损伤退伍军人的压疮风险:一项纵向研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jan 19;6(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5948.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Modernization of a Large Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders Registry: The Veterans Administration Experience.大型脊髓损伤与疾病登记系统的现代化:退伍军人事务部的经验
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Oct 17;4(4):100237. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100237. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Development of Predictive Informatics Tool Using Electronic Health Records to Inform Personalized Evidence-Based Pressure Injury Management for Veterans with Spinal Cord Injury.利用电子健康记录开发预测信息学工具,为脊髓损伤退伍军人提供个性化循证压力性损伤管理。
Mil Med. 2021 Jan 25;186(Suppl 1):651-658. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa469.
5
Spinal Cord Injury survey to determine pressure ulcer vulnerability in the outpatient population.脊髓损伤调查以确定门诊患者发生压疮的易感性。
Med Hypotheses. 2014 Nov;83(5):552-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
6
Documentation of preventive care for pressure ulcers initiated during annual evaluations in SCI.脊髓损伤年度评估期间启动的压疮预防护理记录。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2016 May;39(3):290-300. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2015.1114225. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
Difficulty in Identifying Factors Responsible for Pressure Ulcer Healing in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury.识别脊髓损伤退伍军人压疮愈合相关因素的困难
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Dec;97(12):2085-2094.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.025. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
8
Do vascular risk factors contribute to the prevalence of pressure ulcer in veterans with spinal cord injury?血管危险因素是否会导致脊髓损伤退伍军人压疮的患病率增加?
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(1):46-51. doi: 10.1179/107902610X12923394765652.
9
Validity and reliability of a pressure ulcer monitoring tool for persons with spinal cord impairment.一种用于脊髓损伤患者的压疮监测工具的有效性和可靠性。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 May;37(3):317-27. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000163. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
10
A pilot study to evaluate the role of the Spinal Cord Impairment Pressure Ulcer Monitoring Tool (SCI-PUMT) in clinical decisions for pressure ulcer treatment.一项评估脊髓损伤压疮监测工具(SCI-PUMT)在压疮治疗临床决策中作用的试点研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014 Dec;60(12):28-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying Natural Language Processing to Textual Data From Clinical Data Warehouses: Systematic Review.将自然语言处理应用于临床数据仓库中的文本数据:系统评价。
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Dec 15;11:e42477. doi: 10.2196/42477.
2
Machine learning to develop a predictive model of pressure injury in persons with spinal cord injury.机器学习在脊髓损伤患者压力性损伤预测模型中的应用。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Sep;61(9):513-520. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00924-z. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive and concurrent validity of the Braden scale in long-term care: a meta-analysis.长期护理中Braden量表的预测效度和同时效度:一项荟萃分析
Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):44-56. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12261.
2
Use of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in a community hospital setting: the role of total score and individual subscale scores in triggering preventive interventions.在社区医院环境中使用Braden量表进行压疮风险评估:总分及各子量表得分在触发预防干预措施中的作用
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;41(6):535-8. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000066.
3
The application of implementation science for pressure ulcer prevention best practices in an inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation program.
实施科学在住院脊髓损伤康复项目中预防压疮最佳实践中的应用。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Sep;37(5):589-97. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000247. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
4
Linking electronic health record-extracted psychosocial data in real-time to risk of readmission for heart failure.将电子健康记录中提取的心理社会数据实时链接到心力衰竭再入院的风险。
Psychosomatics. 2011 Jul-Aug;52(4):319-27. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2011.02.007.
5
Summarization of clinical information: a conceptual model.临床信息总结:概念模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Aug;44(4):688-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
6
An automated model to identify heart failure patients at risk for 30-day readmission or death using electronic medical record data.利用电子病历数据建立自动模型识别 30 天内再入院或死亡风险的心力衰竭患者。
Med Care. 2010 Nov;48(11):981-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ef60d9.
7
The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record.从电子健康记录中衡量医疗质量面临的挑战。
Am J Med Qual. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):385-94. doi: 10.1177/1062860609336627. Epub 2009 May 29.
8
Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model.预后与预后研究:验证一个预后模型。
BMJ. 2009 May 28;338:b605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b605.
9
Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model.预后与预后研究:构建预后模型
BMJ. 2009 Mar 31;338:b604. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b604.
10
Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review.临床预测规则的验证、更新及影响:综述
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1085-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.008.