Stein Marc
a History Department , San Francisco State University , San Francisco , California , USA.
J Homosex. 2017;64(7):963-990. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1280999.
This article examines U.S. homophile magazine contributions from and representations of Canada from 1953 to 1964. Drawing on 240 articles, letters, and other items that were published in ONE, Mattachine Review, and The Ladder, the essay first reviews Canadian-authored materials and then shows that U.S. gay and lesbian movement periodicals depicted Canada as more sexually conservative than the United States in three ways and more sexually liberal in one way. The magazines presented Canada as more sexually conservative in its failure to develop an organized gay and lesbian movement, its policies and practices of sexual censorship, and its opposition to progressive homosexual law reform. They portrayed Canada as more sexually liberal in the ways that its mainstream media covered homosexuality. The essay argues that U.S. homophile representations of Canada participated in the ongoing construction and reconstruction of U.S. nationalism. In demonstrating that the magazines generally represented Canada as more sexually conservative than the United States in the years from 1953 to 1964, the essay also shows that more recent depictions of Canada as more sexually liberal are relatively new.
本文考察了1953年至1964年间美国同性恋杂志中来自加拿大的投稿以及对加拿大的呈现。该论文利用在《一》《马特钦评论》和《阶梯》上发表的240篇文章、信件及其他内容,首先回顾了加拿大作者撰写的材料,然后指出美国同性恋运动期刊从三个方面将加拿大描绘为在性方面比美国更保守,从一个方面将其描绘为在性方面更自由。这些杂志认为加拿大在未能发展有组织的同性恋运动、其性审查政策和做法以及对进步的同性恋法律改革的反对方面,在性方面更为保守。它们认为加拿大在主流媒体对同性恋的报道方式上,在性方面更为自由。该论文认为,美国同性恋群体对加拿大的呈现参与了美国民族主义的持续建构与重构。通过证明这些杂志在1953年至1964年间普遍将加拿大描绘为在性方面比美国更保守,该论文还表明,最近将加拿大描绘为在性方面更自由的情况相对较新。