• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼靶控输注患者中催眠深度对标准化强直刺激瞳孔反应性的影响:一项交叉随机试验研究

Influence of Depth of Hypnosis on Pupillary Reactivity to a Standardized Tetanic Stimulus in Patients Under Propofol-Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion: A Crossover Randomized Pilot Study.

作者信息

Sabourdin Nada, Peretout Jean-Baptiste, Khalil Eliane, Guye Marie-Laurence, Louvet Nicolas, Constant Isabelle

机构信息

From the Département d'anesthésiologie, Hôpital Armand Trousseau, Paris, France.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):70-77. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001802.

DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001802
PMID:28107273
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pupillometry allows the measurement of pupillary diameter variations in response to nociceptive stimuli. This technique has been used to monitor the balance between analgesia and nociception. Under general anesthesia, the amplitude of pupillary dilation is related to the amount of administered opioids. The objective of this study was to determine whether at a constant infusion rate of opioids, the pupillary response was influenced by depth of hypnosis assessed by the bispectral index (BIS).

METHODS

Twelve patients (14-20 years) anesthetized for orthopedic surgery were included. Under propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion, remifentanil effect site target concentration was fixed at 1 ng/mL. Two measures of pupillary reflex dilation were performed on each patient in a randomized order: one at BIS 55 and one at BIS 25. These levels of BIS were obtained by adjusting propofol target concentration and maintained for 10 minutes before each measure. For each measure, we applied a standardized tetanic stimulation on the patient's forearm (60 mA, 100 Hz, 5 seconds). All measures were performed before the beginning of surgery.

RESULTS

Pupillary dilation was significantly greater at BIS 55 than at BIS 25: 32.1% ± 5.3% vs 10.4% ± 2.5% (mean difference estimate [95% confidence interval]: 21.8% [12.9-30.6], P < .001), without carryover effect (P = .30) nor period effect (P = .52). Hemodynamic parameters and BIS were not modified by the stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving a constant infusion of remifentanil at a target concentration of 1 ng/mL, pupillary dilation after a standardized tetanic stimulation was influenced by depth of hypnosis assessed by the BIS.

摘要

背景

瞳孔测量法可测量瞳孔直径对伤害性刺激的变化。该技术已用于监测镇痛与伤害感受之间的平衡。在全身麻醉下,瞳孔散大的幅度与阿片类药物的给药量有关。本研究的目的是确定在阿片类药物恒速输注时,瞳孔反应是否受脑电双频指数(BIS)评估的催眠深度影响。

方法

纳入12例接受骨科手术麻醉的患者(14 - 20岁)。在丙泊酚 - 瑞芬太尼靶控输注下,瑞芬太尼效应室靶浓度固定为1 ng/mL。对每位患者以随机顺序进行两次瞳孔反射散大测量:一次在BIS 55时,一次在BIS 25时。通过调整丙泊酚靶浓度获得这些BIS水平,并在每次测量前维持10分钟。对于每次测量,我们对患者的前臂施加标准化的强直刺激(60 mA,100 Hz,5秒)。所有测量均在手术开始前进行。

结果

BIS 55时的瞳孔散大明显大于BIS 25时:32.1% ± 5.3% 对10.4% ± 2.5%(平均差异估计值[95%置信区间]:21.8% [12.9 - 30.6],P <.001),无残留效应(P =.30)也无周期效应(P =.52)。刺激未改变血流动力学参数和BIS。

结论

在接受目标浓度为1 ng/mL瑞芬太尼恒速输注的患者中,标准化强直刺激后的瞳孔散大受BIS评估的催眠深度影响。

相似文献

1
Influence of Depth of Hypnosis on Pupillary Reactivity to a Standardized Tetanic Stimulus in Patients Under Propofol-Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion: A Crossover Randomized Pilot Study.丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼靶控输注患者中催眠深度对标准化强直刺激瞳孔反应性的影响:一项交叉随机试验研究
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):70-77. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001802.
2
Comparisons of Electroencephalographically Derived Measures of Hypnosis and Antinociception in Response to Standardized Stimuli During Target-Controlled Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia.在靶控丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间,对标准化刺激做出反应时,脑电图衍生的催眠和抗伤害感受指标的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Feb;122(2):382-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001029.
3
Effect of Different Concentrations of Propofol Used as a Sole Anesthetic on Pupillary Diameter: A Randomized Trial.不同浓度异丙酚单独用作麻醉剂对瞳孔直径的影响:一项随机试验。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Aug;131(2):510-517. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004362.
4
Pupillary reflex dilation in response to incremental nociceptive stimuli in patients receiving intravenous ketamine.接受静脉注射氯胺酮的患者对递增性伤害性刺激的瞳孔反射性扩张。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Oct;32(5):921-928. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0072-5. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
5
The response of the composite variability index to a standardized noxious stimulus during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.复合变异指数对丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间标准化伤害性刺激的反应。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Mar;116(3):580-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827ced18. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
6
Impact of bispectral index monitoring on stress response and propofol consumption in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.双谱指数监测对冠状动脉搭桥手术患者应激反应及丙泊酚用量的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2004 Nov;101(5):1096-104. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00008.
7
Impact of perioperative lidocaine infusion and bis monitorization on remifentanil dosage in hypotensive anesthesia.围手术期输注利多卡因及双监测对低血压麻醉中瑞芬太尼用量的影响
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(4):559-65.
8
[Effect of ear point embedding on plasma and effect site concentrations of propofol-remifentanil in elderly patients after target-controlled induction].耳穴埋针对老年患者靶控诱导后丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼血浆及效应室浓度的影响
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017 Aug 12;37(8):869-873. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2017.08.017.
9
Pain monitoring in anesthetized children: first assessment of skin conductance and analgesia-nociception index at different infusion rates of remifentanil.麻醉儿童的疼痛监测:瑞芬太尼不同输注速率下皮肤电导和镇痛-伤害感受指数的首次评估
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Feb;23(2):149-55. doi: 10.1111/pan.12071. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
10
C50 for propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion and bispectral index at loss of consciousness and response to painful stimulus in Chinese patients: a multicenter clinical trial.丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼靶控输注的C50以及意识消失和对疼痛刺激反应时的脑电双频指数在中国患者中的研究:一项多中心临床试验
Anesth Analg. 2009 Feb;108(2):478-83. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818f8a30.

引用本文的文献

1
Pupillometry: A loupe to mirror intracranial status during recovery after neurosurgery.瞳孔测量法:神经外科手术后恢复期间反映颅内状况的放大镜。
Brain Circ. 2025 Jun 9;11(3):247-249. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_19_25. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
The value of pupillary diameter in evaluating pain perception after awakening in patients undergoing general anesthesia during orthopedic surgery.瞳孔直径在评估骨科手术全身麻醉后苏醒患者疼痛感知中的价值。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02428-6.
3
Evaluation of the Analgesia Nociception Index and videopupillometry to predict post-tonsillectomy morphine requirements in children a single-centre, prospective interventional study.
评估镇痛伤害感受指数和视频瞳孔测量法预测儿童扁桃体切除术后吗啡需求量:一项单中心前瞻性干预研究
BJA Open. 2022 Jul 31;3:100024. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100024. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Can Opioid-Free Anaesthesia Be Personalised? A Narrative Review.无阿片类药物麻醉能否实现个体化?一篇叙述性综述。
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 10;13(3):500. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030500.
5
Perfusion index as a predictor of working pediatric caudal block under general anesthesia- A prospective observational study.灌注指数作为全身麻醉下小儿骶管阻滞效果预测指标的前瞻性观察研究
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct-Dec;38(4):635-639. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_34_21. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
6
Different perspectives for monitoring nociception during general anesthesia.全身麻醉期间监测伤害感受的不同视角。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr;75(2):112-123. doi: 10.4097/kja.22002. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
7
[Nociception monitoring : Method for intraoperative opioid control?].[伤害感受监测:术中阿片类药物控制方法?]
Anaesthesist. 2021 Sep;70(9):735-752. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-01022-6. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
8
Bispectral index monitoring of the clinical effects of propofol closed-loop target-controlled infusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.脑电双频指数监测丙泊酚闭环靶控输注的临床效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e23930. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023930.
9
Pupillometry in perioperative medicine: a narrative review.瞳孔测量术在围手术期医学中的应用:一篇叙述性综述。
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Apr;68(4):566-578. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01905-z. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
10
Nociception monitoring tools using autonomic tone changes for intraoperative analgesic guidance in pediatric patients.利用自主神经张力变化的伤害性感受监测工具用于小儿患者术中镇痛指导
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2019 Oct 31;14(4):380-392. doi: 10.17085/apm.2019.14.4.380.