Suppr超能文献

结合使用大型观察数据集的高效研究设计进行的经济评估:PLEASANT试验案例研究

Economic Evaluations Alongside Efficient Study Designs Using Large Observational Datasets: the PLEASANT Trial Case Study.

作者信息

Franklin Matthew, Davis Sarah, Horspool Michelle, Kua Wei Sun, Julious Steven

机构信息

Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Design, Trials & Statistics (DTS), ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 May;35(5):561-573. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0484-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large observational datasets such as Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) provide opportunities to conduct clinical studies and economic evaluations with efficient designs.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to report the economic evaluation methodology for a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a UK NHS-delivered public health intervention for children with asthma that was evaluated using CPRD and describe the impact of this methodology on results.

METHODS

CPRD identified eligible patients using predefined asthma diagnostic codes and captured 1-year pre- and post-intervention healthcare contacts (August 2012 to July 2014). Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) 4 months post-intervention were estimated by assigning utility values to exacerbation-related contacts; a systematic review identified these utility values because preference-based outcome measures were not collected. Bootstrapped costs were evaluated 12 months post-intervention, both with 1-year regression-based baseline adjustment (BA) and without BA (observed).

RESULTS

Of 12,179 patients recruited, 8190 (intervention 3641; control 4549) were evaluated in the primary analysis, which included patients who received the protocol-defined intervention and for whom CPRD data were available. The intervention's per-patient incremental QALY loss was 0.00017 (bias-corrected and accelerated 95% confidence intervals [BCa 95% CI] -0.00051 to 0.00018) and cost savings were £14.74 (observed; BCa 95% CI -75.86 to 45.19) or £36.07 (BA; BCa 95% CI -77.11 to 9.67), respectively. The probability of cost savings was much higher when accounting for BA versus observed costs due to baseline cost differences between trial arms (96.3 vs. 67.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Economic evaluations using data from a large observational database without any primary data collection is feasible, informative and potentially efficient. Clinical Trials Registration Number: ISRCTN03000938.

摘要

背景

大型观察性数据集,如临床实践研究数据链(CPRD),为开展具有高效设计的临床研究和经济评估提供了机会。

目的

我们的目的是报告一项针对英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)为哮喘儿童提供的公共卫生干预措施的整群随机对照试验(RCT)的经济评估方法,该试验使用CPRD进行评估,并描述该方法对结果的影响。

方法

CPRD使用预定义的哮喘诊断代码识别符合条件的患者,并记录干预前和干预后1年的医疗接触情况(2012年8月至2014年7月)。通过为与病情加重相关的接触分配效用值来估计干预后4个月的质量调整生命年(QALY);由于未收集基于偏好的结局指标,因此通过系统评价确定了这些效用值。在干预后12个月评估自展成本,分别采用基于1年回归的基线调整(BA)和不采用BA(观察值)的方法。

结果

在招募的12179名患者中,8190名(干预组3641名;对照组4549名)在主要分析中进行了评估,主要分析包括接受方案定义干预且有CPRD数据的患者。干预组每名患者的增量QALY损失为0.00017(偏差校正和加速95%置信区间[BCa 95% CI]为-0.00051至0.00018),成本节约分别为14.74英镑(观察值;BCa 95% CI为-75.86至45.19)或36.07英镑(BA;BCa 95% CI为-77.11至9.67)。由于试验组之间的基线成本差异,考虑BA时成本节约的概率远高于观察成本时(分别为96.3%和67.3%)。

结论

使用大型观察性数据库的数据且无需任何原始数据收集进行经济评估是可行的、信息丰富的且可能是高效的。临床试验注册号:ISRCTN03000938。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/872d/5385191/0bd8dc435aed/40273_2016_484_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验