Hanon Olivier, Vidal Jean-Sébastien, Le Heuzey Jean-Yves, Kirchhof Paulus, De Caterina Raffaele, Schmitt Josef, Laeis Petra, Mannucci Pier Mannuccio, Marcucci Maura
APHP, Hôpital Broca, 54-56 Pascal, 75013 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Equipe d'Accueil 4468, Paris, France.
Georges Pompidou Hospital, René Descartes University, Paris, France.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;232:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.046. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
Few studies describe oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription practices in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
In this sub-analysis of the PREFER in AF study, performed in 2012, patients were stratified according to age (<80 [n=5565] and ≥80years [n=1660]) and OAC treatment. Factors associated with OAC prescription were analyzed in a multivariate logistic regression model with backward elimination of variables least associated with OAC use.
Patients ≥80years presented with permanent AF more often (p<0.0001) and reported fatigue and dyspnea more frequently (p<0.0001) and palpitations less frequently (p<0.0001) than patients <80years. Hypertension, stroke, heart failure, coronary heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, cancer, chronic kidney disease, and prior major bleeding were significantly more frequent in ≥80years. Most patients were treated with OACs in both age groups. The overall use of vitamin K antagonists was similar in both groups (78.2% vs.78.2% p=0.98), while the use of non-vitamin K antagonist OACs was lower in the ≥80years old group than in the <80years group (4.5% vs. 6.6% p=0.001). Among patients ≥80years, prior stroke and heart failure were significantly associated with OAC use, whereas higher age, prior bleeding, paroxysmal AF, chronic hepatic disease, and difficulties with self-care were associated with no OAC use.
The current use of OAC in European AF patients was satisfactorily high in octogenarians, suggesting reasonable implementation of current guidelines. Interestingly, patients with poor quality of life were less often anticoagulated. This may warrant further studies.
很少有研究描述老年房颤患者口服抗凝药(OAC)的处方实践。
在2012年进行的房颤研究PREFER的这项亚分析中,患者根据年龄(<80岁[n = 5565]和≥80岁[n = 1660])和OAC治疗进行分层。在多变量逻辑回归模型中分析与OAC处方相关的因素,并向后排除与OAC使用相关性最小的变量。
与<80岁的患者相比,≥80岁的患者永久性房颤更为常见(p<0.0001),疲劳和呼吸困难的报告更为频繁(p<0.0001),心悸的报告则较少(p<0.0001)。≥80岁患者的高血压、中风、心力衰竭、冠心病、外周动脉疾病、癌症、慢性肾病和既往重大出血更为常见。两个年龄组的大多数患者都接受了OAC治疗。两组维生素K拮抗剂的总体使用率相似(78.2%对78.2%,p = 0.98),而≥80岁组非维生素K拮抗剂OAC的使用率低于<80岁组(4.5%对6.6%,p = 0.001)。在≥80岁的患者中,既往中风和心力衰竭与OAC使用显著相关,而较高年龄、既往出血、阵发性房颤、慢性肝病和自我护理困难与未使用OAC相关。
在欧洲房颤患者中,目前八旬老人对OAC的使用率令人满意,表明当前指南得到了合理实施。有趣的是,生活质量较差的患者接受抗凝治疗的频率较低。这可能需要进一步研究。