Katikireddi Srinivasa Vittal, Hilton Shona, Bond Lyndal
University of Glasgow, UK.
Centre of Excellence in Intervention and Prevention Science.
Evid Policy. 2016 Nov;12(4):521-539. doi: 10.1332/174426415X14430986392944.
The minimum unit pricing (MUP) alcohol policy debate has been informed by the Sheffield model, a study which predicts impacts of different alcohol pricing policies. This paper explores the Sheffield model's influences on the policy debate by drawing on 36 semi-structured interviews with policy actors who were involved in the policy debate. Although commissioned by policy makers, the model's influence has been far broader than suggested by views of 'rational' policy making. While findings from the Sheffield model have been used in instrumental ways, they have arguably been more important in helping debate competing values underpinning policy goals.
最低单位定价（MUP）酒精政策辩论受到了谢菲尔德模型的影响，该模型是一项预测不同酒精定价政策影响的研究。本文通过对36位参与政策辩论的政策参与者进行半结构化访谈，探讨了谢菲尔德模型对政策辩论的影响。尽管该模型是由政策制定者委托制作的，但其影响范围远比“理性”政策制定观点所表明的要广泛得多。虽然谢菲尔德模型的研究结果被以工具性的方式使用，但它们在帮助辩论支撑政策目标的相互竞争的价值观方面可能更为重要。
