• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用证据支持健康公共政策:政策有效性-可行性循环。

Use of evidence to support healthy public policy: a policy effectiveness-feasibility loop.

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, England.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Nov 1;90(11):847-53. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.104968. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

DOI:10.2471/BLT.12.104968
PMID:23226897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3506406/
Abstract

Public policy plays a key role in improving population health and in the control of diseases, including non-communicable diseases. However, an evidence-based approach to formulating healthy public policy has been difficult to implement, partly on account of barriers that hinder integrated work between researchers and policy-makers. This paper describes a "policy effectiveness-feasibility loop" (PEFL) that brings together epidemiological modelling, local situation analysis and option appraisal to foster collaboration between researchers and policy-makers. Epidemiological modelling explores the determinants of trends in disease and the potential health benefits of modifying them. Situation analysis investigates the current conceptualization of policy, the level of policy awareness and commitment among key stakeholders, and what actually happens in practice, thereby helping to identify policy gaps. Option appraisal integrates epidemiological modelling and situation analysis to investigate the feasibility, costs and likely health benefits of various policy options. The authors illustrate how PEFL was used in a project to inform public policy for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in four parts of the eastern Mediterranean. They conclude that PEFL may offer a useful framework for researchers and policy-makers to successfully work together to generate evidence-based policy, and they encourage further evaluation of this approach.

摘要

公共政策在改善人口健康和控制疾病方面(包括非传染性疾病)发挥着关键作用。然而,基于证据的制定健康公共政策的方法一直难以实施,部分原因是存在阻碍研究人员和政策制定者之间综合工作的障碍。本文描述了一个“政策效果-可行性循环”(PEFL),它将流行病学建模、当地情况分析和方案评估结合起来,促进研究人员和政策制定者之间的合作。流行病学建模探讨了疾病趋势的决定因素以及改变这些趋势的潜在健康益处。情况分析调查了政策的当前概念化、主要利益相关者的政策意识和承诺水平,以及实际发生的情况,从而有助于确定政策差距。方案评估将流行病学建模和情况分析相结合,以调查各种政策方案的可行性、成本和可能的健康益处。作者举例说明了 PEFL 如何在一个项目中被用于为地中海东部的四个地区的心血管疾病和糖尿病预防提供公共政策信息。他们得出结论,PEFL 可能为研究人员和政策制定者提供一个有用的框架,以成功地共同制定基于证据的政策,并鼓励进一步评估这种方法。

相似文献

1
Use of evidence to support healthy public policy: a policy effectiveness-feasibility loop.利用证据支持健康公共政策:政策有效性-可行性循环。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Nov 1;90(11):847-53. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.104968. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
2
How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study.研究人员和政策制定者之间的循证生成伙伴关系如何在实践中实施?一项定性访谈研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 15;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0441-2.
3
Getting research to the policy table: a qualitative study with public health researchers on engaging with policy makers.将研究成果引入政策议程:一项针对公共卫生研究人员与政策制定者互动的定性研究
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Apr 30;12:E56. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140546.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation.国民健康服务体系决策中经济评估的应用:一项综述与实证研究
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(7):iii, ix-x, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta12070.
6
How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers.研究证据在卫生政策中的应用是如何被感知的?研究人员和政策制定者报告的比较。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 20;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0345-6.
7
'Are we there yet?' - operationalizing the concept of Integrated Public Health Policies.“我们到了吗?”——实施综合公共卫生政策的概念
Health Policy. 2014 Feb;114(2-3):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
8
Evidence-Based Decision-Making 8: A Primer on Health Policy for Researchers.循证决策 8:研究人员健康政策入门。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:517-536. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_28.
9
Improving communication between researchers and policy makers in long-term care or "researchers are from Mars; policy makers are from Venus".改善长期护理领域研究人员与政策制定者之间的沟通 或者 “研究人员来自火星;政策制定者来自金星”。
Policy Brief (Cent Home Care Policy Res). 2001 Fall(5):1-6.
10
A modelling tool for policy analysis to support the design of efficient and effective policy responses for complex public health problems.一种用于政策分析的建模工具,以支持针对复杂公共卫生问题设计高效且有效的政策应对措施。
Implement Sci. 2015 Mar 3;10:26. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0221-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing public health through multi-stakeholder collaboration in Africa.通过非洲多利益相关方合作加强公共卫生。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 5;86(10):5672-5675. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002532. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Why is health improvement policy so difficult to secure?为何改善健康的政策如此难以落实?
Open Res Eur. 2022 Aug 26;2:76. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14841.2. eCollection 2022.
3
The future of public health policymaking after COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review of lessons from Health in All Policies.新冠疫情后公共卫生政策制定的未来:对“健康融入所有政策”经验教训的定性系统综述
Open Res Eur. 2021 Jul 21;1:23. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13178.2. eCollection 2021.
4
Adapting waterpipe-specific pictorial health warning labels to the Tunisian context using a mixed method approach.采用混合方法将水烟专用图示健康警语标签改编适用于突尼斯国情。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 24;18(3):e0279014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279014. eCollection 2023.
5
Management of diabetics. Comparative study of two contrasting health structures.糖尿病管理。两种截然不同的卫生结构的对比研究。
Tunis Med. 2021 Jan;99(1):129-138.
6
The legal feasibility of adopting a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in seven sub-Saharan African countries.在七个撒哈拉以南非洲国家征收含糖饮料税的法律可行性。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1884358. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1884358.
7
Ottawa charter framework as a guide for type 2 diabetes prevention and control in Iran.渥太华宪章框架作为伊朗2型糖尿病预防与控制的指南。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019 Mar 19;18(1):255-261. doi: 10.1007/s40200-018-0381-3. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
Dementia Primary Prevention Policies and Strategies and Their Local Implementation: A Scoping Review Using England as a Case Study.痴呆症一级预防政策和策略及其地方实施:以英格兰为例的范围综述。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(s1):S303-S318. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180608.
9
National action plan for non-communicable diseases prevention and control in Iran; a response to emerging epidemic.伊朗非传染性疾病预防与控制国家行动计划;应对新出现的流行病。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017 Jan 23;16:3. doi: 10.1186/s40200-017-0288-4. eCollection 2017.
10
The role of the Sheffield model on the minimum unit pricing of alcohol debate: the importance of a rhetorical perspective.谢菲尔德模式在酒精最低限价辩论中的作用:修辞视角的重要性。
Evid Policy. 2016 Nov;12(4):521-539. doi: 10.1332/174426415X14430986392944.

本文引用的文献

1
MedCHAMPS: Mediterranean studies of cardiovascular disease and hyperglycaemia: analytical modelling of population socio-economic transitions.地中海心血管疾病与高血糖研究(MedCHAMPS):人口社会经济转型的分析模型
Int J Public Health. 2015 Jan;60 Suppl 1:S1-2. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0618-y. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
2
Evidence in the development of health policy.卫生政策制定中的证据。
Public Health. 2012 Mar;126(3):217-219. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.01.026. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
3
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14: Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking.循证卫生决策支持工具(STP)14:组织和利用政策对话支持循证决策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S14. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S14.
4
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking.支持循证卫生决策的工具(STP)13:编写和使用政策简报以支持循证决策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S13.
5
Understanding evidence-based public health policy.理解循证公共卫生政策。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1576-83. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156224. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
6
Review paper: epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, and public health.综述论文:流行病学、循证医学与公共卫生。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2009 Jul;21(3):244-51. doi: 10.1177/1010539509335516. Epub 2009 May 14.
7
The impact of demographic and risk factor changes on coronary heart disease deaths in Beijing, 1999-2010.1999 - 2010年人口统计学和风险因素变化对北京冠心病死亡的影响
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jan 22;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-30.
8
A conceptual framework for public health: NICE's emerging approach.公共卫生的概念框架:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的新方法。
Public Health. 2009 Jan;123(1):e14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.10.031. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
9
Planning ahead in public health? A qualitative study of the time horizons used in public health decision-making.公共卫生领域的提前规划?一项关于公共卫生决策中时间跨度的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Dec 18;8:415. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-415.
10
Policy-makers' attitudes to decision support models for coronary heart disease: a qualitative study.政策制定者对冠心病决策支持模型的态度:一项定性研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Oct;13(4):209-14. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008045.