Suppr超能文献

将收缩压干预试验结果应用于老年人。

Applying the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Results to Older Adults.

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jan;65(1):16-21. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14681. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

Abstract

The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01206062) was stopped early because of significantly lower risk of cardiovascular disease in participants randomized to a systolic blood pressure target of 120 mmHg (intensive) than in those randomized to 140 mmHg (standard). The cardiovascular outcome benefit was also identified in subjects aged 75 and older assigned to the intensive arm-34% lower than in the standard arm-in addition to 33% lower all-cause mortality at 3.14 years of follow-up. These beneficial outcomes held in older participants characterized as frail or with impaired gait speed. This article addresses several questions that need to be considered in applying the SPRINT results to the clinical care of older adults: Why are the SPRINT results discordant from those of epidemiological studies? Do the SPRINT findings generalize to the frail, older adults that I care for? Were there more adverse events in the intensive treatment group? What about cognitive and kidney outcomes? What are future considerations, and how low should we go?

摘要

收缩压干预试验(SPRINT;ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01206062)提前终止,因为随机分配到收缩压目标为 120mmHg(强化)的参与者心血管疾病风险显著低于随机分配到 140mmHg(标准)的参与者。在 75 岁及以上的受试者中,也确定了心血管结局获益——与标准组相比,强化组降低 34%——在 3.14 年的随访中,全因死亡率也降低了 33%。这些有益的结果适用于被归类为虚弱或步态速度受损的老年参与者。本文针对将 SPRINT 结果应用于老年人临床护理时需要考虑的几个问题进行了探讨:为什么 SPRINT 的结果与流行病学研究的结果不一致?SPRINT 的发现是否适用于我照顾的虚弱的老年人?强化治疗组是否有更多的不良事件?认知和肾脏结果如何?未来需要考虑哪些因素,收缩压应该降到多低?

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验