• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于嗅觉功能测试分数的嗅觉严重程度评分与自我报告的嗅觉丧失严重程度评分之间的相关性。

Correlation between olfactory severity ratings based on olfactory function test scores and self-reported severity rating of olfactory loss.

作者信息

Seok Jungirl, Shim Ye Ji, Rhee Chae-Seo, Kim Jeong-Whun

机构信息

a Department of Otorhinolaryngology , Armed Forces Seoul Hospital , Seoul , South Korea.

b Department of Otorhinolaryngology , Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital , Seongnam , South Korea.

出版信息

Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Jul;137(7):750-754. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1277782. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1080/00016489.2016.1277782
PMID:28112015
Abstract

CONCLUSION

Olfactory test scores are significantly correlated with self-rated severity scales. However, the statistical rating based on olfactory tests did not strongly agree with the self-reported severity rating. This suggests that there is a discrepancy between olfactory test results and the severity described by patients themselves.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify the correlation between statistical ratings based on test scores and self-rating of the severity of olfactory loss.

METHOD

A total of 1555 subjects were asked to rate olfactory loss severity by one of five scales. Olfactory tests consist of the butanol threshold test (BTT) and cross-cultural smell identification test (CCSIT).

RESULTS

There were significant correlations between BTT scores and self-rated severity scales (r = 0.619, p < 0.001) and between CCSIT scores and self-rated severity scales (r = 0.597, p < 0.001) after adjustment for age, sex, and medical conditions. Using discriminant analysis for both BTT and CCSIT, scores 0-4 could be statistically rated as anosmia, scores 5 and 6 as severe hyposmia, scores 7 and 8 as moderate hyposmia, and scores 9-12 as normosmia (Wilks's lambda = 0.605, p < 0.001 for BTT and Wilks's lambda = 0.597, p < 0.001 for CCSIT).

摘要

结论

嗅觉测试分数与自我评定的严重程度量表显著相关。然而,基于嗅觉测试的统计评级与自我报告的严重程度评级并不十分一致。这表明嗅觉测试结果与患者自身描述的严重程度之间存在差异。

目的

本研究旨在确定基于测试分数的统计评级与嗅觉丧失严重程度的自我评级之间的相关性。

方法

共1555名受试者被要求通过五种量表之一对嗅觉丧失的严重程度进行评级。嗅觉测试包括丁醇阈值测试(BTT)和跨文化嗅觉识别测试(CCSIT)。

结果

在对年龄、性别和健康状况进行调整后,BTT分数与自我评定的严重程度量表之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.619,p < 0.001),CCSIT分数与自我评定的严重程度量表之间也存在显著相关性(r = 0.597,p < 0.001)。对BTT和CCSIT均采用判别分析,分数0 - 4在统计学上可评定为嗅觉丧失,分数5和6为严重嗅觉减退,分数7和8为中度嗅觉减退,分数9 - 12为嗅觉正常(BTT的威尔克斯λ = 0.605,p < 0.001;CCSIT的威尔克斯λ = 0.597,p < 0.001)。

相似文献

1
Correlation between olfactory severity ratings based on olfactory function test scores and self-reported severity rating of olfactory loss.基于嗅觉功能测试分数的嗅觉严重程度评分与自我报告的嗅觉丧失严重程度评分之间的相关性。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Jul;137(7):750-754. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1277782. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
2
Validation of Olfactory Questionnaire in Koreans: an Alternative for Conventional Psychophysical Olfactory Tests.《嗅觉问卷在韩国人群中的验证:对传统心理物理学嗅觉测试的一种替代》
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Feb 8;36(6):e34. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e34.
3
Simple assessment of olfaction in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻窦炎患者嗅觉的简易评估
Acta Otolaryngol. 2015 Mar;135(3):258-63. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.974288. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
4
Validation of Korean Olfactory Questionnaire for Perioperative Olfactory Assessment in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.用于鼻内镜下经鼻颅底手术围手术期嗅觉评估的韩国嗅觉问卷的验证
Ear Nose Throat J. 2024 Feb 29:1455613241234818. doi: 10.1177/01455613241234818.
5
Treatment of postviral olfactory loss with glucocorticoids, Ginkgo biloba, and mometasone nasal spray.用糖皮质激素、银杏叶和莫米松鼻喷雾剂治疗病毒感染后嗅觉丧失。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Oct;135(10):1000-4. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.141.
6
How does measured olfactory function correlate with self-ratings of the sense of smell in patients with nasal polyposis?测量的嗅觉功能与鼻息肉患者自我嗅觉评估之间有何相关性?
Laryngoscope. 2012 May;122(5):947-52. doi: 10.1002/lary.23219. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Olfactory identification and its relationship to executive functions, memory, and disability one year after severe traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤一年后的嗅觉识别及其与执行功能、记忆和残疾的关系。
Neuropsychology. 2016 Jan;30(1):98-108. doi: 10.1037/neu0000206. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
8
Prognostic factors of olfactory dysfunction.嗅觉功能障碍的预后因素。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Apr;136(4):347-51. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.27.
9
Validation of a new scale to assess olfactory dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease.评估帕金森病患者嗅觉障碍的新量表的验证。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 May;18(4):358-61. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
10
Comparison of subjective olfaction ratings in patients with and without olfactory disorders.有嗅觉障碍和无嗅觉障碍患者的主观嗅觉评分比较。
J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Jul;126(7):692-7. doi: 10.1017/S002221511200076X. Epub 2012 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation method of Driver's olfactory preferences: a machine learning model based on multimodal physiological signals.驾驶员嗅觉偏好的评估方法:一种基于多模态生理信号的机器学习模型
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Dec 18;12:1433861. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1433861. eCollection 2024.
2
Parosmia in patients with post-infectious olfactory dysfunction in the era of COVID-19-associated olfactory impairment.新冠病毒相关嗅觉障碍流行时期,感染后嗅觉障碍患者的嗅觉异常。
HNO. 2024 Sep;72(9):649-656. doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01470-7. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
Chemosensory Dysfunction in Long-Term COVID-19 Assessed by Self-Reported and Direct Psychophysical Methods.
通过自我报告和直接心理物理学方法评估的长期新冠病毒感染后的化学感觉功能障碍
Life (Basel). 2022 Sep 25;12(10):1487. doi: 10.3390/life12101487.
4
COVID-19 Induced Taste Dysfunction and Recovery: Association with Smell Dysfunction and Oral Health Behaviour.COVID-19 引起的味觉障碍及恢复:与嗅觉障碍和口腔健康行为的关联。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 26;58(6):715. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060715.
5
Long-Term Subjective and Objective Assessment of Smell and Taste in COVID-19.COVID-19 患者嗅觉和味觉的长期主观和客观评估
Cells. 2022 Feb 24;11(5):788. doi: 10.3390/cells11050788.
6
Commentary on Letter to the Editor regarding "Eight-month follow-up of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in recovered COVID-19 patients".关于致编辑的信的评论,信的主题为“新冠康复患者嗅觉和味觉功能障碍的八个月随访”
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):103190. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103190. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
7
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review.新型冠状病毒感染中的嗅觉和味觉功能障碍:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021 Aug;15:100268. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100268. Epub 2021 May 18.
8
The outcome of olfactory impairment in patients with otherwise paucisymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 during the pandemic.大流行期间其他症状较轻的 2019 冠状病毒病患者嗅觉障碍的转归。
J Laryngol Otol. 2021 May;135(5):426-435. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121001110. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
9
Validation of Olfactory Questionnaire in Koreans: an Alternative for Conventional Psychophysical Olfactory Tests.《嗅觉问卷在韩国人群中的验证:对传统心理物理学嗅觉测试的一种替代》
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Feb 8;36(6):e34. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e34.
10
Reversible Taste Loss in a COVID-19 Patient With Preexisting Chronic Smell Impairment.COVID-19 患者伴发先前存在的慢性嗅觉障碍导致味觉可逆性丧失
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2021 Jan-Dec;9:2324709621990765. doi: 10.1177/2324709621990765.