剖腹卵巢切除术与腹腔镜卵巢切除术：两种方法的比较。腹腔镜时代母犬的卵巢切除术。
Laparotomic vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: comparing the two methods. The ovariectomy in the bitch in laparoscopic era.
作者信息
Cassata Giovanni, Palumbo Vincenzo Davide, Cicero Luca, Damiano Giuseppe, Maenza Antonio, Migliazzo Aldo, Di Paola Gioacchino, Vicari Domenico, Fazzotta Salvatore, Lo Monte Attilio Ignazio
机构信息
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia "A. Mirri".
出版信息
Acta Biomed. 2016 Jan 16;87(3):271-274.
BACKGROUND AND AIM
The aim of the present work is to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of ultrasound scalpel during laparoscopic ovariectomy in the bitch.
METHODS
Two groups of 10 subjects each, of different races and ages, were compared. In the first group, ovariectomy was performed laparoscopically, using harmonic scalpel to remove ovary. In the second group surgery was performed by means of classical laparotomy.
RESULTS
Pre-operative time was similar in both groups. Total operative time, from incision to skin suture, showed significant difference between the two groups, being laparoscopy faster than laparotomy. Partial operative time for bilateral oophorectomy resulted lower using open technique, but, considering each ovary, there was no significant difference in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of harmonic scalpel to perform ovariectomy during laparoscopy is an effective time-sparing surgical approach compared to the already great practicality of laparotomy.
背景与目的
本研究旨在评估超声刀在母犬腹腔镜卵巢切除术中的应用效果。
方法
比较两组各10只不同种族和年龄的受试对象。第一组采用腹腔镜卵巢切除术，使用谐波手术刀切除卵巢。第二组通过经典剖腹术进行手术。
结果
两组术前时间相似。从切口到皮肤缝合的总手术时间，两组间存在显著差异，腹腔镜手术比剖腹术更快。采用开放技术时双侧卵巢切除术的部分手术时间较低，但就每个卵巢而言，两组间无显著差异。
结论
与已具较高实用性的剖腹术相比，在腹腔镜手术中使用谐波手术刀进行卵巢切除术是一种有效的节省时间的手术方法。
Zotero 插件