Bell Cynthia J, Zimet Gregory D, Hinds Pamela S, Broome Marion E, McDaniel Anna M, Mays Rose M, Champion Victoria L
Author Affiliations: College of Nursing, Department of Family, Community and Mental Health, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan (Dr Bell); Department of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis (Dr Zimet); Children's National Health System, Washington, DC (Dr Hinds); School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Broome); College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (Dr McDaniel); and School of Nursing, Indiana University (Drs Mays and Champion); and Indiana University Melvin & Bren Simon Cancer Center (Dr Champion), Indianapolis.
Cancer Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;41(2):E21-E39. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000465.
Adolescents living with incurable cancer require ongoing support to process grief, emotions, and information as disease progresses including treatment options (phase 1 clinical trials and/or hospice/palliative care). Little is known about how adolescents become ready for such discussions.
The purpose of this study was to explore the process of adolescent readiness for end-of-life preparedness discussions, generating a theoretical understanding for guiding clinical conversations when curative options are limited.
We explored 2 in-depth cases across time using case-study methodology. An à priori conceptual model based on current end-of-life research guided data collection and analysis. Multiple sources including in-depth adolescent interviews generated data collection on model constructs. Analysis followed a logical sequence establishing a chain of evidence linking raw data to study conclusions. Synthesis and data triangulation across cases and time led to theoretical generalizations. Initially, we proposed a linear process of readiness with 3 domains: a cognitive domain (awareness), an emotional domain (acceptance), and a behavioral domain (willingness), which preceded preparedness.
Findings led to conceptual model refinement showing readiness is a dynamic internal process that interacts with preparedness. Current awareness context facilitates the type of preparedness discussions (cognitive or emotional). Furthermore, social constraint inhibits discussions.
Data support theoretical understanding of the dynamism of readiness. Future research that validates adolescent conceptualization will ensure age-appropriate readiness representation.
Understanding the dynamic process of readiness for engaging in end-of-life preparedness provides clinician insight for guiding discussions that facilitate shared decision making and promote quality of life for adolescents and their families.
患有无法治愈癌症的青少年在疾病进展过程中,包括在面对治疗选择(1期临床试验和/或临终关怀/姑息治疗)时,需要持续的支持来处理悲伤情绪、情感及信息。对于青少年如何为这类讨论做好准备,我们知之甚少。
本研究旨在探索青少年为临终准备讨论做好准备的过程,从而形成一种理论理解,以指导在治愈性选择有限时的临床对话。
我们采用案例研究方法,跨时间探索了2个深入案例。基于当前临终研究的先验概念模型指导数据收集与分析。包括青少年深入访谈在内的多个来源生成了关于模型构建的数据收集。分析遵循逻辑顺序,建立了将原始数据与研究结论相联系的证据链。跨案例和时间的综合与数据三角验证得出了理论概括。最初,我们提出了一个准备就绪的线性过程,包括3个领域:认知领域(意识)、情感领域(接受)和行为领域(意愿),这些领域先于准备状态。
研究结果导致概念模型的完善,表明准备就绪是一个与准备状态相互作用的动态内部过程。当前的意识背景促进了准备讨论的类型(认知或情感)。此外,社会约束会抑制讨论。
数据支持了对准备就绪动态性的理论理解。未来验证青少年概念化的研究将确保与年龄相适应的准备就绪表征。
理解参与临终准备就绪的动态过程,为临床医生提供了指导讨论的见解,有助于促进共同决策,提高青少年及其家庭的生活质量。