• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用倾向得分的观察性研究。

Observational Research Using Propensity Scores.

作者信息

Raghunathan Karthik, Layton J Bradley, Ohnuma Tetsu, Shaw Andrew D

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and the Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and the Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016 Nov;23(6):367-372. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.11.010.

DOI:10.1053/j.ackd.2016.11.010
PMID:28115080
Abstract

In most observational studies, treatments or other "exposures" (in an epidemiologic sense) do not occur at random. Instead, treatments or other such interventions depend on several patient-related and patient-independent characteristics. Such factors, associated with the receipt vs nonreceipt of treatment, may also be-independently-associated with outcomes. Thus, confounding exists making it difficult to ascertain the true association between treatments and outcomes. Propensity scores (PS) represent an intuitive set of approaches to reduce the influence of such "confounding" factors. PS is a computed probability of treatment, a value that is estimated for each patient in an observational study and then applied (in a variety of ways such as matching, stratification, weighting, etc.) to reduce distortion in the true nature of the association between treatment (or any similar exposure) and outcomes. Despite several advantages, PS-based methods cannot account for unmeasured confounding, ie, for factors that are not being included in the computation of PS.

摘要

在大多数观察性研究中,治疗或其他“暴露因素”(从流行病学意义上讲)并非随机出现。相反,治疗或其他此类干预措施取决于若干与患者相关及与患者无关的特征。这些与接受治疗与否相关的因素,也可能与结局独立相关。因此,存在混杂因素,使得难以确定治疗与结局之间的真正关联。倾向评分(PS)代表了一组直观的方法,用于减少此类“混杂”因素的影响。PS是治疗的计算概率,在观察性研究中为每个患者估计一个值,然后以各种方式(如匹配、分层、加权等)应用该值,以减少治疗(或任何类似暴露因素)与结局之间关联的真实性质的扭曲。尽管有几个优点,但基于PS的方法无法解释未测量的混杂因素,即未纳入PS计算的因素。

相似文献

1
Observational Research Using Propensity Scores.使用倾向得分的观察性研究。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016 Nov;23(6):367-372. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.11.010.
2
Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research.倾向评分方法及其在肾脏病学研究中的应用。
J Nephrol. 2011 May-Jun;24(3):256-62. doi: 10.5301/JN.2011.6429.
3
Use and Interpretation of Propensity Scores in Aging Research: A Guide for Clinical Researchers.衰老研究中倾向得分的应用与解读:临床研究人员指南
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Oct;64(10):2065-2073. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14253. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
On the use of propensity scores in case of rare exposure.罕见暴露情况下倾向得分的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Mar 31;16:38. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0135-1.
5
Propensity-score analysis in thoracic surgery: When, why, and an introduction to how.胸外科中的倾向评分分析:何时、为何以及如何进行介绍。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jun;151(6):1484-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.036. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
6
Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.在初级保健中使用倾向评分比较随机对照试验和观察性研究中的治疗效果。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Sep;67(662):e643-e649. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692153. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Observational studies using propensity score analysis underestimated the effect sizes in critical care medicine.观察性研究使用倾向评分分析低估了重症医学中的效应大小。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;67(8):932-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.018. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
8
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.不同倾向评分方法估计边缘风险比的性能。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2837-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.5705. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
9
The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.倾向评分方法在生存或事件发生时间结局中的应用:报告与随机试验中使用的效应测量指标相似的指标。
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 30;33(7):1242-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.5984. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
10
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating absolute effects of treatments on survival outcomes: A simulation study.不同倾向评分方法在估计治疗对生存结局的绝对效应方面的表现:一项模拟研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Oct;25(5):2214-2237. doi: 10.1177/0962280213519716. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug interactions in hospital prescriptions in Denmark: Prevalence and associations with adverse outcomes.丹麦医院处方中的药物相互作用:发生率及与不良结局的关联。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):632-642. doi: 10.1002/pds.5415. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Polypharmacy and medication use by cancer history in a nationally representative group of adults in the USA, 2003-2014.美国全国代表性成年人样本中,癌症病史与药物使用及多重用药情况,2003-2014 年。
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Jun;16(3):659-666. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01059-x. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Hyperkalemia and its Association With Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, Hospitalizations, and Intensive Care Unit Admissions in a Population-Based Retrospective Cohort.
基于人群的回顾性队列研究中高钾血症及其与死亡率、心血管事件、住院和重症监护病房入院的关联
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Mar 17;6(5):1309-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.02.038. eCollection 2021 May.