Ercumen Ayse, Naser Abu Mohd, Arnold Benjamin F, Unicomb Leanne, Colford John M, Luby Stephen P
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Mar;96(3):561-568. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0489. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
Accurately assessing the microbiological safety of water sources is essential to reduce waterborne fecal exposures and track progress toward global targets of safe water access. Sanitary inspections are a recommended tool to assess water safety. We collected 1,684 water samples from 902 shallow tubewells in rural Bangladesh and conducted sanitary surveys to assess whether sanitary risk scores could predict water quality, as measured by . We detected in 41% of tubewells, mostly at low concentrations. Based on sanitary scores, 31% of wells were low risk, 45% medium risk, and 25% high or very high risk. Older wells had higher risk scores. levels were higher in wells where the platform was cracked or broken (Δlog = 0.09, 0.00-0.18) or undercut by erosion (Δlog = 0.13, 0.01-0.24). However, the positive predictive value of these risk factors for presence was low (< 50%). Latrine presence within 10 m was not associated with water quality during the wet season but was associated with less frequent detection during the dry season (relative risk = 0.72, 0.59-0.88). Sanitary scores were not associated with presence or concentration. These findings indicate that observed characteristics of a tubewell, as measured by sanitary inspections in their current form, do not sufficiently characterize microbiological water quality, as measured by . Assessments of local groundwater and geological conditions and improved water quality indicators may reveal more clear relationships. Our findings also suggest that the dominant contamination route for shallow groundwater sources is short-circuiting at the wellhead rather than subsurface transport.
准确评估水源的微生物安全性对于减少水源性粪便暴露以及追踪实现全球安全用水目标的进展至关重要。卫生检查是评估水安全的推荐工具。我们从孟加拉国农村的902口浅管井中采集了1684份水样,并进行了卫生调查,以评估卫生风险评分是否能够预测水质(以[具体指标]衡量)。我们在41%的管井中检测到了[目标微生物],大多浓度较低。根据卫生评分,31%的井为低风险,45%为中等风险,25%为高风险或非常高风险。较老的井风险评分更高。在平台有裂缝或破损的井中(Δlog = 0.09,0.00 - 0.18)或被侵蚀掏空的井中(Δlog = 0.13,0.01 - 0.24),[目标微生物]水平更高。然而,这些风险因素对[目标微生物]存在的阳性预测值较低(< 50%)。在10米范围内有厕所,在雨季与水质无关,但在旱季与[目标微生物]检测频率较低有关(相对风险 = 0.72,0.59 - 0.88)。卫生评分与[目标微生物]的存在或浓度无关。这些发现表明,以目前形式的卫生检查所衡量的管井观测特征,不足以表征以[具体指标]衡量的微生物水质。对当地地下水和地质条件的评估以及改进的水质指标可能会揭示更明确的关系。我们的研究结果还表明,浅层地下水源的主要污染途径是井口处的短路而非地下传输。