Suppr超能文献

高效、有效地利用同伴教学进行医学生模拟教学。

Efficient and Effective Use of Peer Teaching for Medical Student Simulation.

机构信息

University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Pediatrics, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Cooper University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Camden, New Jersey.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):137-141. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.11.32753. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Simulation is increasingly used in medical education, promoting active learning and retention; however, increasing use also requires considerable instructor resources. Simulation may provide a safe environment for students to teach each other, which many will need to do when they enter residency. Along with reinforcing learning and increasing retention, peer teaching could decrease instructor demands. Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of peer-taught simulation compared to physician-led simulation. We hypothesized that peer-taught simulation would lead to equivalent knowledge acquisition when compared to physician-taught sessions and would be viewed positively by participants.

METHOD

This was a quasi-experimental study in an emergency medicine clerkship. The group was faculty taught. In the peer-taught group, students were assigned to teach one of the three simulation-based medical emergency cases. Each student was instructed to master their topic and teach it to their peers using the provided objectives and resource materials. The students were assigned to groups of three, with all three cases represented; students took turns leading their case. Three groups ran simultaneously. During the intervention sessions, one physician was present to monitor the accuracy of learning and to answer questions, while three physicians were required for the control groups. Outcomes compared pre-test and post-test knowledge and student reaction between control and intervention groups.

RESULTS

Both methods led to equally improved knowledge; mean score for the post-test was 75% for both groups (p=0.6) and were viewed positively. Students in the group agreed that peer-directed learning was an effective way to learn. However, students in the group scored their simulation experience more favorably.

CONCLUSION

In general, students' response to peer teaching was positive, students learned equally well, and found peer-taught sessions to be interactive and beneficial.

摘要

简介

模拟教学在医学教育中应用越来越广泛,它可以促进主动学习和保留知识;然而,随着使用的增加,也需要相当多的教师资源。模拟教学可以为学生提供一个相互学习的安全环境,而许多学生在进入住院医师实习期后都需要这样的环境。除了强化学习和增加保留知识之外,同伴教学还可以减少教师的需求。我们的目标是确定同伴教学模拟与医生主导的模拟相比的效果。我们假设同伴教学模拟在知识获取方面与医生教学的模拟效果相当,并且会得到参与者的积极评价。

方法

这是一项在急诊医学实习中的准实验研究。实验组由教师授课。在同伴教学组中,学生被分配教授三个基于模拟的医疗紧急情况案例中的一个。每个学生都被要求掌握自己的主题,并使用提供的目标和资源材料将其教授给同伴。学生被分成三人一组,所有三个案例都有代表;学生轮流领导他们的案例。三个小组同时进行。在干预课程中,有一位医生在场监测学习的准确性并回答问题,而对照组需要三位医生。比较了对照组和干预组的预测试和后测试知识以及学生反应。

结果

两种方法都导致了知识的同等提高;两组的后测平均分数均为 75%(p=0.6),并且都得到了积极的评价。实验组的学生认为同伴指导学习是一种有效的学习方式。然而,实验组的学生对模拟体验的评价更为有利。

结论

总的来说,学生对同伴教学的反应是积极的,学生学习效果相当,并且发现同伴教学的课程具有互动性和有益性。

相似文献

1
Efficient and Effective Use of Peer Teaching for Medical Student Simulation.高效、有效地利用同伴教学进行医学生模拟教学。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):137-141. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.11.32753. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
A comprehensive student peer-teaching program.一个全面的学生同伴教学计划。
Acad Med. 1999 May;74(5):583-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199905000-00051.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验