• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于关于氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂相互作用的沟通,新使用者中胃保护药物的处方行为

Prescription behavior for gastroprotective drugs in new users as a result of communications regarding clopidogrel - proton pump inhibitor interaction.

作者信息

Kruik-Kollöffel Willemien J, van der Palen Job, Kruik H Joost, van Herk-Sukel Myrthe P P, Movig Kris L L

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede The Netherlands; Present address: Department of Clinical Pharmacy Saxenburgh Group Hardenberg The Netherlands.

Medical School Twente Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede The Netherlands; Department of Research Methodology, Measurement and Data Analysis University of Twente Enschede The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016 Jul 18;4(4):e00242. doi: 10.1002/prp2.242. eCollection 2016 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/prp2.242
PMID:28116095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5242171/
Abstract

Safety concerns of the concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were published in 2009 and 2010 by the medicines regulatory agencies, including a direct healthcare professional communication. We examined the association between various safety statements and prescription behavior for gastroprotective drugs in naïve patients in the Netherlands during the years 2008-2011. Data from the PHARMO Database Network were analyzed with interrupted time series analyses to estimate the impact of each communication on drug prescriptions. Dispensings were used as a proxy variable for prescription behavior. After the early communication in January 2009, 15.5% (95% CI 7.8, 23.4) more patients started concomitantly with (es)omeprazole and 13.8% (95% CI 6.5, 21.2) less with other PPIs. Directly after the first statement in June 2009, we found a steep increase in histamine 2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) peaking at 25%, placing those patients at risk for gastrointestinal events. This effect for H2RA faded away after a few months. In February 2010, when the official advice via an adjusted statement was to avoid (es)omeprazole, we found a decrease of 11.9% (95% CI 5.7, 18.2) for (es)omeprazole and an increase of +16.0% (95% CI 10.3, 21.7) for other PPIs. Still 22.6% (95% CI 19.5, 25.7) of patients started on (es)omeprazole in February 2010, placing them at risk for cardiovascular events. Advices of regulatory authorities were followed, however, reluctantly and not fully, probably partly because of the existing scientific doubt about the interaction.

摘要

药品监管机构于2009年和2010年发布了关于氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂(PPI)联合使用的安全性问题,其中包括直接向医疗保健专业人员传达的信息。我们研究了2008 - 2011年期间荷兰初治患者中各种安全性声明与胃保护药物处方行为之间的关联。利用中断时间序列分析对来自PHARMO数据库网络的数据进行分析,以估计每次信息传达对药物处方的影响。配药被用作处方行为的替代变量。在2009年1月的早期信息传达之后,开始同时使用(埃索)美拉唑的患者增加了15.5%(95%置信区间7.8,23.4),而开始同时使用其他PPI的患者减少了13.8%(95%置信区间6.5,21.2)。在2009年6月的首次声明之后,我们发现组胺2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)急剧增加,峰值达到25%,使这些患者面临胃肠道事件的风险。几个月后,H2RA的这种影响逐渐消失。2010年2月,当通过调整后的声明给出官方建议避免使用(埃索)美拉唑时,我们发现(埃索)美拉唑减少了11.9%(95%置信区间5.7,18.2),而其他PPI增加了16.0%(95%置信区间10.3,21.7)。2010年2月,仍有22.6%(95%置信区间19.5,25.7)的患者开始使用(埃索)美拉唑,使他们面临心血管事件的风险。然而,监管机构的建议未被充分且勉强遵循,这可能部分是因为对这种相互作用存在科学质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e4/5242171/d026c736bc00/PRP2-4-0242-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e4/5242171/f60244d80450/PRP2-4-0242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e4/5242171/3227d3305d74/PRP2-4-0242-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e4/5242171/d026c736bc00/PRP2-4-0242-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e4/5242171/f60244d80450/PRP2-4-0242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e4/5242171/3227d3305d74/PRP2-4-0242-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e4/5242171/d026c736bc00/PRP2-4-0242-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prescription behavior for gastroprotective drugs in new users as a result of communications regarding clopidogrel - proton pump inhibitor interaction.由于关于氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂相互作用的沟通,新使用者中胃保护药物的处方行为
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016 Jul 18;4(4):e00242. doi: 10.1002/prp2.242. eCollection 2016 Aug.
2
Decrease in Switches to 'Unsafe' Proton Pump Inhibitors After Communications About Interactions with Clopidogrel.在就与氯吡格雷的相互作用进行沟通后,转而使用“不安全”质子泵抑制剂的情况减少。
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Aug;37(8):787-794. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0536-x.
3
The impact of direct healthcare professional communication on prescribing practice in the UK hospital setting: an interrupted time series analysis.直接与医疗保健专业人员沟通对英国医院环境下处方实践的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Drug Saf. 2013 Jul;36(7):557-64. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0057-3.
4
Is the concomitant use of clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors still associated with increased adverse cardiovascular outcomes following coronary angioplasty?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published studies (2012 - 2016).冠状动脉血管成形术后,氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂联合使用是否仍与不良心血管结局增加相关?:对近期发表的研究(2012 - 2016年)的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0453-6.
5
Differences in utilisation of gastroprotective drugs between 2001 and 2005 in Australia and Nova Scotia, Canada.澳大利亚和加拿大新斯科舍省 2001 年至 2005 年胃保护药物利用的差异。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Jul;22(7):735-43. doi: 10.1002/pds.3442. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
6
[Impact of pharmacotherapeutic warnings on the prescription of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors in hospitalised patients].[药物治疗警示对住院患者氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂处方的影响]
Farm Hosp. 2012 Jul-Aug;36(4):250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
7
Clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors: is there a significant drug-drug interaction?氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂:是否存在显著的药物相互作用?
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;21(4):27-36.
8
Characteristics of children and adolescents first prescribed proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2-receptor antagonists: an observational cohort study.首次开具质子泵抑制剂或组胺-2受体拮抗剂的儿童及青少年特征:一项观察性队列研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Dec;33(12):2251-2259. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1336083. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
Review article: combination of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors: implications for clinicians.综述文章:氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂联合应用:对临床医生的启示。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;15(4):326-37. doi: 10.1177/1074248410369109. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
10
Trends in concomitant clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor treatment among ACS inpatients, 2000-2016.2000 - 2016年急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者中氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂联合治疗的趋势
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;75(2):227-235. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2564-8. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Concomitant Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prophylaxis With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Usage.双联抗血小板治疗时的胃肠道出血联合预防
Gastroenterology Res. 2025 Jun 16;18(4):159-163. doi: 10.14740/gr2023. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Mixed Impact of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications When Considering Proximal Outcomes and the Targeted Population: A Systematic Review.考虑近端结局和目标人群时直接医疗专业人员沟通的混合影响:一项系统评价
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Mar;34(3):e70135. doi: 10.1002/pds.70135.
3
Concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors: A retrospective analysis of prescription behaviour.

本文引用的文献

1
Inconsistencies among European Union pharmaceutical regulator safety communications: a cross-country comparison.欧盟药品监管机构安全通信之间的不一致性:一项跨国比较。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 21;9(10):e109100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109100. eCollection 2014.
2
From molecule to market access: drug regulatory science as an upcoming discipline.从分子到市场准入:作为一门新兴学科的药物监管科学。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2013 Nov 5;719(1-3):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.07.021. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
3
When direct health-care professional communications have an impact on inappropriate and unsafe use of medicines.
氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂的联合使用:处方行为的回顾性分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun;91(6):1739-1748. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16402. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
4
[Effect of the direct healthcare professional communication on citalopram and escitalopram drug utilization for inpatient treatment of anxiety disorders].[直接医疗专业人员沟通对西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰用于焦虑症住院治疗的药物使用情况的影响]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Nov;65(11):1204-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03594-z. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
5
Use of Clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors Alone or in Combinations in Persons with Diabetes in Denmark; Potential for CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Drug Therapy.丹麦糖尿病患者单独或联合使用氯吡格雷和质子泵抑制剂;CYP2C19基因型指导药物治疗的潜力。
Metabolites. 2021 Feb 10;11(2):96. doi: 10.3390/metabo11020096.
6
Trends in concomitant clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor treatment among ACS inpatients, 2000-2016.2000 - 2016年急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者中氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂联合治疗的趋势
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;75(2):227-235. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2564-8. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
7
Measuring the impact of medicines regulatory interventions - Systematic review and methodological considerations.衡量药品监管干预措施的影响——系统评价及方法学考虑。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;84(3):419-433. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13469. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
8
The Impact of US FDA and Health Canada Warnings Related to the Safety of High-dose Simvastatin.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和加拿大卫生部发布的与大剂量辛伐他汀安全性相关警告的影响
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2017 Dec;4(4):215-223. doi: 10.1007/s40801-017-0116-7.
9
Decrease in Switches to 'Unsafe' Proton Pump Inhibitors After Communications About Interactions with Clopidogrel.在就与氯吡格雷的相互作用进行沟通后,转而使用“不安全”质子泵抑制剂的情况减少。
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Aug;37(8):787-794. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0536-x.
当直接的医疗保健专业人员的沟通对不适当和不安全的药物使用产生影响时。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):360-5. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.262. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
4
Concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors: impact on platelet function and clinical outcome- a systematic review.氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂并用:对血小板功能和临床结局的影响-系统评价。
Heart. 2013 Apr;99(8):520-7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302371. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
5
Prescribing of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone following safety signals: analysis of trends in dispensing patterns in the Netherlands from 1998 to 2008.rosiglitazone 和 pioglitazone 处方的安全性信号后:从 1998 年到 2008 年荷兰配药模式的趋势分析。
Drug Saf. 2012 Jun 1;35(6):471-80. doi: 10.2165/11596950-000000000-00000.
6
Impact of safety-related regulatory action on clinical practice: a systematic review.安全相关监管行动对临床实践的影响:系统评价。
Drug Saf. 2012 May 1;35(5):373-85. doi: 10.2165/11599100-000000000-00000.
7
Impact of safety-related regulatory action on drug use in ambulatory care in the Netherlands.安全相关监管行动对荷兰门诊护理中药物使用的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 May;91(5):838-45. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.308.
8
Targeting outpatient drug safety: recommendations of the Dutch HARM-Wrestling Task Force.目标设定在门诊药物安全:荷兰 HARM-Wrestling 工作组的建议。
Drug Saf. 2012 Mar 1;35(3):245-59. doi: 10.2165/11596000-000000000-00000.
9
CYP2C19 genotype, clopidogrel metabolism, platelet function, and cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CYP2C19 基因型、氯吡格雷代谢、血小板功能与心血管事件:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2011 Dec 28;306(24):2704-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1880.
10
ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 expert consensus document on the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and thienopyridines: a focused update of the ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.美国心脏病学会基金会/美国胃肠病学会/美国心脏协会2010年质子泵抑制剂与噻吩并吡啶类药物联合使用专家共识文件:ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008年关于降低抗血小板治疗和非甾体抗炎药使用的胃肠道风险专家共识文件的重点更新。美国心脏病学会基金会专家共识文件特别工作组报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 7;56(24):2051-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.010.