• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标设定在门诊药物安全:荷兰 HARM-Wrestling 工作组的建议。

Targeting outpatient drug safety: recommendations of the Dutch HARM-Wrestling Task Force.

机构信息

IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2012 Mar 1;35(3):245-59. doi: 10.2165/11596000-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11596000-000000000-00000
PMID:22339574
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two Dutch observational studies (HARM [Hospital Admissions Related to Medication] and IPCI [Integrated Primary Care Information]) have shown that approximately 5% of all unplanned hospital admissions are associated with adverse drug events (ADEs), of which 40-46% are potentially preventable. These studies prompted the initiation of a Dutch multidisciplinary task force, which was assigned to reduce the number of prescriber-related hospital admissions related to medications (HARMs) in a quick-win way.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to identify the most relevant ADEs and to develop a limited number of recommendations for concrete interventions, which should be feasible and relatively easy to convert into computerized drug safety alerts.

METHOD

To identify the major ADEs, crude data of HARM and IPCI were reanalysed and compared with different international studies, followed by structured literature searches for further characterization of the identified ADEs, their risk factors and potential risk-reduction strategies. Based on this information, the Task Force drew up general and drug-specific recommendations. As the recommendations of the Task Force are a mixture of evidence- and expert-based risk-reducing strategies, they have been graded in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology.

RESULTS

Seven pharmacologically predictable ADEs associated with ten drug classes were responsible for more than half of all potentially preventable hospital admissions in the IPCI and HARM studies, which was comparable to the results of international studies. Gastrointestinal and other bleedings were the most frequent ADE, followed by disturbances of diabetes mellitus control, electrolyte disturbances, fractures, renal insufficiency and heart failure. Nine general and 34 drug-specific recommendations were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

As HARMs constitute a significant public health problem, the Task Force underlines the need to implement its recommendations as soon as possible. They do not replace existing guidelines, but reinforce, complement and fine-tune existing Dutch and international guidelines. Further research is still required to assess the cost consequences and cost effectiveness of some recommendations, and to monitor the implementation of the recommendations and their effect on the incidence of potentially preventable HARMs.

摘要

背景

两项荷兰观察性研究(HARM [与药物相关的住院] 和 IPCI [综合初级保健信息])表明,约有 5%的所有非计划性住院与药物不良事件(ADE)相关,其中 40-46%是可以预防的。这些研究促使荷兰多学科工作组启动,其任务是尽快减少与药物相关的医嘱相关的住院人数(HARMs)。

目的

本研究旨在确定最相关的 ADE,并制定数量有限的具体干预建议,这些建议应具有可行性且相对容易转化为计算机化的药物安全警报。

方法

为了确定主要的 ADE,对 HARM 和 IPCI 的原始数据进行了重新分析,并与不同的国际研究进行了比较,然后对确定的 ADE 进行了结构化文献搜索,以进一步描述其特征、风险因素和潜在的风险降低策略。基于这些信息,工作组制定了一般和药物特异性建议。由于工作组的建议是基于证据和专家的风险降低策略的混合物,因此根据 GRADE(推荐评估、制定和评估)方法对其进行了分级。

结果

IPC 和 HARM 研究中,七种与十种药物类别相关的可预测药理学 ADE 导致超过一半的可预防住院与药物相关,这与国际研究结果相似。胃肠道和其他出血是最常见的 ADE,其次是糖尿病控制紊乱、电解质紊乱、骨折、肾功能不全和心力衰竭。制定了九条一般建议和三十四条药物特异性建议。

结论

由于 HARMs 构成了一个重大的公共卫生问题,工作组强调需要尽快实施其建议。它们不是替代现有的指南,而是加强、补充和微调现有的荷兰和国际指南。仍需要进一步研究来评估一些建议的成本后果和成本效益,并监测建议的实施情况及其对可预防的 HARMs 发生率的影响。

相似文献

1
Targeting outpatient drug safety: recommendations of the Dutch HARM-Wrestling Task Force.目标设定在门诊药物安全:荷兰 HARM-Wrestling 工作组的建议。
Drug Saf. 2012 Mar 1;35(3):245-59. doi: 10.2165/11596000-000000000-00000.
2
Incidence, preventability, and impact of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and potential ADEs in hospitalized children in New Zealand: a prospective observational cohort study.新西兰住院儿童药物不良事件(ADEs)及潜在ADEs的发生率、可预防性和影响:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
Paediatr Drugs. 2009;11(2):153-60. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200911020-00005.
3
Quick assessment of drug-related admissions over time (QUADRAT study).药物相关入院情况随时间的快速评估(QUADRAT研究)。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 May;24(5):495-503. doi: 10.1002/pds.3747. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
4
Hospital admissions to geriatric ward related to adverse drug events: a cross-sectional study from the Czech Republic.老年病房与药物不良事件相关的住院情况:来自捷克共和国的一项横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Oct;43(5):1218-1226. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01237-y. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Development and application of indicators for the reduction of potentially preventable hospital admissions related to medications.减少与药物相关的可预防住院治疗的指标的制定与应用。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Feb;13(2):157-65. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2014.867015. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
6
A computerized adverse drug event alerting system using clinical rules: a retrospective and prospective comparison with conventional medication surveillance in the Netherlands.使用临床规则的计算机化药物不良事件警报系统:与荷兰常规药物监测的回顾性和前瞻性比较。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):233-42. doi: 10.2165/11536500-000000000-00000.
7
Preventable hospital admissions related to medication (HARM): cost analysis of the HARM study.可预防的与药物相关的医院入院(HARM):HARM 研究的成本分析。
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.024.
8
The epidemiology of preventable adverse drug events: a review of the literature.可预防的药物不良事件的流行病学:文献综述
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2003 Jul 15;115(12):407-15. doi: 10.1007/BF03040432.
9
Hospital admissions caused by adverse drug events: an Australian prospective study.药物不良事件导致的住院情况:一项澳大利亚前瞻性研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2014 Feb;38(1):51-7. doi: 10.1071/AH12027.
10
Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients.医院患者药物不良事件的计算机化监测
JAMA. 1991 Nov 27;266(20):2847-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing deprescribing in primary care for those towards the end of life: A qualitative interview study with patients and healthcare practitioners.影响生命终末期人群在基层医疗中减药的因素:一项对患者和医疗保健从业者的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med. 2024 Sep;38(8):884-892. doi: 10.1177/02692163241261202. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
2
Adoption of antithrombotic stewardship and utilization of clinical decision support systems-A questionnaire-based survey in Dutch hospitals.抗栓管理的采用和临床决策支持系统的利用-荷兰医院基于问卷调查的研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0306033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306033. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital admissions related to medications and implementing guidelines.与药物和实施指南相关的住院情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Apr 27;169(8):810-1; author reply 811. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.81.
2
Development of the pharmacy safety climate questionnaire: a principal components analysis.药房安全氛围调查问卷的编制:主成分分析
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):28-31. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.022129.
3
Frequency of and risk factors for preventable medication-related hospital admissions in the Netherlands.荷兰可预防的药物相关住院情况的发生率及风险因素
The use of artificial intelligence to optimize medication alerts generated by clinical decision support systems: a scoping review.
利用人工智能优化临床决策支持系统生成的用药提醒:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 May 20;31(6):1411-1422. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae076.
4
Predictive value of gastrointestinal symptoms and patient risk factors for NSAID-associated gastrointestinal ulcers defined by endoscopy? Insights from a pooled analysis of two naproxen clinical trials.内镜下定义的胃肠道症状和患者危险因素对 NSAID 相关胃肠道溃疡的预测价值?来自两项萘普生临床研究的汇总分析的见解。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0284358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284358. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluation of a multifaceted medication review in older patients in the outpatient setting: a before-and-after study.评估在门诊环境中对老年患者进行多方面药物审查的效果:一项前后对照研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Apr;45(2):483-490. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01531-3. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
6
Diuretics, SGLT2 inhibitors and falls in older heart failure patients: to prescribe or to deprescribe? A clinical review.利尿剂、SGLT2 抑制剂和老年心力衰竭患者跌倒:处方还是撤药?临床综述。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Aug;14(4):659-674. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00752-7. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
7
Adherence to coprescribing of laxatives with opioids and associated characteristics in general practices in the Netherlands.荷兰一般实践中与阿片类药物同时开具泻药的依从性及相关特征。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01911-8.
8
Do we become better prescribers after graduation: A 1-year international follow-up study among junior doctors.毕业后我们是否成为更好的处方者:一项针对初级医生的为期 1 年的国际随访研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Dec;88(12):5218-5226. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15443. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
9
Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward.用于检测老年病房急性住院多药治疗患者药物不良反应的触发工具的性能。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Aug;13(4):837-847. doi: 10.1007/s41999-022-00649-x. Epub 2022 May 30.
10
Does coprescribing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral anticoagulants increase the risk of major bleeding, stroke and systemic embolism?非甾体抗炎药与口服抗凝药物并用是否会增加大出血、中风和全身性栓塞的风险?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;88(11):4789-4811. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15371. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1890-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.3.
4
Grades of recommendation for antithrombotic agents: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).抗血栓药物的推荐等级:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南(第8版)
Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):123S-131S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0654.
5
Use of physician education and computer alert to improve targeted use of gastroprotection among NSAID users.利用医生教育和计算机提醒来提高非甾体抗炎药使用者针对性使用胃保护措施的情况。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 May;103(5):1097-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01907.x.
6
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.GRADE:关于证据质量评级和推荐强度的新共识。
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD.
7
Compliance with national guidelines for the management of drug-drug interactions in Dutch community pharmacies.荷兰社区药房对国家药物相互作用管理指南的遵循情况。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Dec;41(12):2024-31. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K240. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
8
A composite screening tool for medication reviews of outpatients: general issues with specific examples.一种用于门诊患者药物评估的综合筛查工具:一般问题及具体示例
Drugs Aging. 2007;24(9):733-60. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200724090-00003.
9
Relationship between polypharmacy and underprescribing.多重用药与处方不足之间的关系。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;65(1):130-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02961.x. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
10
Following the script: how drug reps make friends and influence doctors.照章行事:医药代表如何结交并影响医生。
PLoS Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):e150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040150.