1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Sep;31(9):1179-1188. doi: 10.1177/0269215516689331. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
To investigate a new botulinum neurotoxin type A, termed letibotulinumtoxinA(Botulax) and compare its efficacy and safety for post-stroke upper limb spasticity with that of onabotulinumtoxinA(Botox).
A prospective, double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study.
Six university hospitals in Korea.
A total of 187 stroke participants with upper limb spasticity.
Two kinds of botulinum neurotoxin type A were used. One set of injection was performed and total injected doses were 309.21±62.48U(Botulax) and 312.64±49.99U(Botox)( P>0.05).
Primary outcome was measured using the modified Ashworth scale for wrist flexors at week 4 and secondary outcome was measured using modified Ashworth scale for wrist flexors, elbow flexors, finger flexors, and thumb flexors as well as Global Assessment in spasticity, Disability Assessment Scale, and Caregiver Burden Scale. Safety measures including adverse events, vital signs and physical examination, and laboratory tests were also monitored.
The mean ages for the Botulax group were 56.81±9.49 and which for the Botox group were 56.93±11.93( P>0.05). In primary outcome, the change in modified Ashworth scale for wrist flexors was -1.45±0.61 in the Botulax group and -1.40±0.57 in the Botox group, and the difference between the two groups was -0.06(95% CI:-0.23-0.12, P>0.05). In secondary outcome, both groups demonstrated significant improvements with respect to modified Ashworth scale, Global Assessment in spasticity, Disability Assessment Scale, and Caregiver Burden Scale ( P<0.05), and no significant difference was observed between the two groups ( P>0.05). In addition, safety measures showed no significant differences between the two groups ( P>0.05).
The efficacy and safety of Botulax were comparable with those of Botox in treatment of post-stoke upper limb spasticity.
研究一种新型肉毒毒素 A 型,称为利妥昔单抗毒素 A(Botulax),并比较其治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的疗效和安全性与肉毒毒素 A 型(Botox)的疗效和安全性。
前瞻性、双盲、多中心、随机对照临床试验。
韩国六所大学医院。
共 187 例脑卒中上肢痉挛患者。
使用两种肉毒毒素 A 型。一组注射,总注射剂量为 309.21±62.48U(Botulax)和 312.64±49.99U(Botox)(P>0.05)。
第 4 周时采用改良 Ashworth 量表测量腕屈肌的主要结局,采用改良 Ashworth 量表测量腕屈肌、肘屈肌、指屈肌和拇指屈肌以及痉挛的整体评估、残疾评估量表和照顾者负担量表测量次要结局。还监测了安全性措施,包括不良事件、生命体征和体格检查以及实验室检查。
Botulax 组的平均年龄为 56.81±9.49,Botox 组的平均年龄为 56.93±11.93(P>0.05)。在主要结局方面,Botulax 组腕屈肌改良 Ashworth 量表的变化为-1.45±0.61,Botox 组为-1.40±0.57,两组之间的差异为-0.06(95%CI:-0.23-0.12,P>0.05)。在次要结局方面,两组在改良 Ashworth 量表、痉挛整体评估、残疾评估量表和照顾者负担量表方面均有显著改善(P<0.05),两组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,两组的安全性措施无显著差异(P>0.05)。
Botulax 治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的疗效和安全性与 Botox 相当。