Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seirei Hamamatsu City Rehabilitation Hospital, Shizuoka 433-8511, Japan.
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Feb 18;12(2):127. doi: 10.3390/toxins12020127.
In many countries, 400 units (U) is the maximum dose of onabotulinumtoxinA available to treat upper limb spasticity, but few studies have demonstrated the optimal use of this dose. In the double-blind phase of this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of 400 vs. 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. Both groups received 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA injected in the forearm. An additional 160 U onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) or placebo (240 U group) was injected in the elbow flexors. Both groups showed similar muscle tone reduction in the wrist, fingers, and thumb; muscle tone reduction in the elbow flexors was greater in the group treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) compared to placebo (240 U group). Functional disabilities improved in both groups. No substantial difference was found in safety profiles. In the subsequent open-label phase, all participants received repeat injections of 400 U onabotulinumtoxinA (target muscles and doses per muscle determined by the physician). Similar efficacy and safety outcomes, as with the 400 U group in the double-blind phase, were confirmed. This final report demonstrates that injection of onabotulinumtoxinA 400 U relieves muscle tone in a wide range of areas and improves functional disabilities; generally, it was well-tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified. The dosing data in the open-label phase will inform optimal use of onabotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261167).
在许多国家,400 单位(U)是用于治疗上肢痉挛的最大奥氮平毒素 A 剂量,但很少有研究证明这种剂量的最佳使用方法。在这项随机对照试验的双盲阶段,我们比较了 400U 与 240U 奥氮平毒素 A 治疗中风后上肢痉挛的疗效和安全性。两组均在前臂注射 240U 奥氮平毒素 A。另外 160U 奥氮平毒素 A(400U 组)或安慰剂(240U 组)注射在肘屈肌。两组的腕部、手指和拇指的肌肉张力均有相似的降低;与安慰剂(240U 组)相比,奥氮平毒素 A(400U 组)治疗组的肘屈肌的肌肉张力降低更明显。两组的功能障碍均有改善。安全性特征无显著差异。在随后的开放标签阶段,所有参与者均重复注射 400U 奥氮平毒素 A(由医生确定重复注射的目标肌肉和每块肌肉的剂量)。与双盲阶段的 400U 组一样,确认了相似的疗效和安全性结果。本最终报告表明,注射 400U 奥氮平毒素 A 可缓解广泛区域的肌肉张力并改善功能障碍;一般来说,它具有良好的耐受性,没有发现新的安全性问题。开放标签阶段的剂量数据将为奥氮平毒素 A 在临床实践中的最佳使用提供信息(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03261167)。