• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评价利特舒注射用A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的随机、双盲、阳性对照、多中心、Ⅲ期临床研究

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Liztox versus Botox in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2023 Dec 12;15(12):697. doi: 10.3390/toxins15120697.

DOI:10.3390/toxins15120697
PMID:38133201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10748261/
Abstract

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection is a commonly used therapeutic intervention for upper limb spasticity in stroke patients. This study was designed as a randomized, active-drug-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Liztox in comparison to onabotulinum toxin A (Botox) for individuals with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. The primary outcome was the alteration in wrist flexor muscle tone from the initial assessment to the fourth week, evaluated using the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes included MAS score changes for the wrist at weeks 8 and 12 from baseline; MAS score changes for finger and elbow flexors; and changes in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS), Subject's Global Assessment (SGA), the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS) at weeks 4, 8, and 12 from baseline. The MAS score for wrist flexor spasticity decreased by -1.14 ± 0.59 in the Liztox group and -1.22 ± 0.59 in the Botox group from baseline to week 4. The difference [97.5% confidence interval (CI)] between the test and control groups was 0.08 [-∞, 0.26], confirming the non-inferiority of the test group compared to the control group. Furthermore, there were consistent improvements in the IGA, SGA, and CBS scores across all assessment intervals, with no statistically significant variances detected between the two groups. No safety-related concerns were reported during the study. In conclusion, Liztox injection proved to be a secure and efficacious intervention for managing upper extremity spasticity in post-stroke patients.

摘要

A型肉毒毒素(BTX-A)注射是治疗脑卒中患者上肢痉挛的常用治疗方法。本研究是一项随机、阳性药物对照、双盲、多中心、3 期临床试验,旨在评估利司妥与注射用 A 型肉毒毒素(Botox)治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛患者的安全性和有效性。主要结局指标是改良 Ashworth 量表(MAS)评估的从基线到第 4 周腕屈肌肌张力的变化。次要结局指标包括从基线到第 8 周和第 12 周腕、指、肘屈肌 MAS 评分的变化;残疾评定量表(DAS)、患者总体评估(SGA)、研究者总体评估(IGA)和照顾者负担量表(CBS)评分的变化。利司妥组和博妥组从基线到第 4 周腕屈肌痉挛 MAS 评分分别降低了 -1.14 ± 0.59 和-1.22 ± 0.59。试验组与对照组差值[97.5%置信区间(CI)]为 0.08 [-∞,0.26],证实试验组与对照组的非劣效性。此外,在所有评估间隔内,IGA、SGA 和 CBS 评分均持续改善,两组间无统计学差异。研究过程中未报告与安全性相关的问题。总之,利司妥注射治疗脑卒中后患者上肢痉挛安全有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/709e/10748261/917a9f9d6b41/toxins-15-00697-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/709e/10748261/027d1d480b33/toxins-15-00697-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/709e/10748261/917a9f9d6b41/toxins-15-00697-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/709e/10748261/027d1d480b33/toxins-15-00697-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/709e/10748261/917a9f9d6b41/toxins-15-00697-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Liztox versus Botox in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity.一项评价利特舒注射用A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的随机、双盲、阳性对照、多中心、Ⅲ期临床研究
Toxins (Basel). 2023 Dec 12;15(12):697. doi: 10.3390/toxins15120697.
2
Efficacy and safety of NABOTA in post-stroke upper limb spasticity: a phase 3 multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.NABOTA治疗中风后上肢痉挛的疗效与安全性:一项3期多中心、双盲、随机对照试验
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Oct 15;357(1-2):192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.07.028. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
3
Efficacy and Safety of MT10107 (Coretox) in Poststroke Upper Limb Spasticity Treatment: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Drug-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial.MT10107(Coretox)治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、阳性药物对照、多中心、III 期临床试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Sep;101(9):1485-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.025. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
Neuronox versus BOTOX in the Treatment of Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.Neuronox与保妥适治疗中风后上肢痉挛:一项多中心随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0128633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128633. eCollection 2015.
5
Safety and efficacy of letibotulinumtoxinA(BOTULAX®) in treatment of post stroke upper limb spasticity: a randomized, double blind, multi-center, phase III clinical trial.注射用利鲁唑治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化的随机、双盲、多中心、III 期临床研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Sep;31(9):1179-1188. doi: 10.1177/0269215516689331. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
6
Safety and Efficacy of HU-014 in the Treatment of Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Phase I Pilot Study.HU-014 治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的安全性和有效性:一项 I 期初步研究。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;14(11):730. doi: 10.3390/toxins14110730.
7
Efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke upper-limb spasticity in Japanese subjects: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (J-PURE).一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(J-PURE):在日本受试者中,应用依库珠单抗毒素 A 治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的疗效和安全性。
J Neurol. 2020 Jul;267(7):2029-2041. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09777-5. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
8
Safety and efficacy of MT10107 in post-stroke upper limb spasticity treatment: A phase I randomized controlled trial.MT10107 治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的安全性和有效性:一项 I 期随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 4;101(44):e31367. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031367.
9
Botulinum toxin type A in post-stroke upper limb spasticity.A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Aug;26(8):1983-92. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.497103.
10
BoTULS: a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A.BoTULS 研究:一项多中心随机对照试验,旨在评估 A 型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的临床疗效和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(26):1-113, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14260.

引用本文的文献

1
OnabotulinumtoxinA in the Management of Pain in Adult Patients with Spasticity: A Systematic Literature Review.A型肉毒毒素治疗成人痉挛性疼痛的系统文献综述
Toxins (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;17(8):418. doi: 10.3390/toxins17080418.
2
Sub-acute oral exposure to lowest observed adverse effect level of nivalenol exacerbates atopic dermatitis in mice via direct activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signal in antigen-presenting cells.亚急性口服最低观察到的有害作用水平的雪腐镰刀菌烯醇可通过抗原呈递细胞中丝裂原活化蛋白激酶信号的直接激活加重小鼠特应性皮炎。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 Jul;98(7):2173-2183. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03740-3. Epub 2024 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of HU-014 in the Treatment of Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Phase I Pilot Study.HU-014 治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的安全性和有效性:一项 I 期初步研究。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;14(11):730. doi: 10.3390/toxins14110730.
2
When can maximal efficacy occur with repeat botulinum toxin injection in upper limb spastic paresis?在上肢痉挛性轻瘫中重复注射肉毒杆菌毒素时,何时能达到最大疗效?
Brain Commun. 2020 Nov 18;3(1):fcaa201. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa201. eCollection 2021.
3
Effects of repeated abobotulinumtoxinA injections in upper limb spasticity.
反复注射阿博特肉毒毒素 A 对上肢痉挛的影响。
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Feb;57(2):245-254. doi: 10.1002/mus.25721. Epub 2017 Aug 13.
4
Safety and efficacy of letibotulinumtoxinA(BOTULAX®) in treatment of post stroke upper limb spasticity: a randomized, double blind, multi-center, phase III clinical trial.注射用利鲁唑治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化的随机、双盲、多中心、III 期临床研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Sep;31(9):1179-1188. doi: 10.1177/0269215516689331. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
5
Botulinum toxin as early intervention for spasticity after stroke or non-progressive brain lesion: A meta-analysis.肉毒杆菌毒素作为中风或非进行性脑损伤后痉挛的早期干预措施:一项荟萃分析。
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Dec 15;371:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
6
Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A for upper limb spasticity after stroke or traumatic brain injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.A型肉毒毒素治疗中风或创伤性脑损伤后上肢痉挛的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价及荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;53(2):256-267. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04329-X. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
7
Practice guideline update summary: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, adult spasticity, and headache: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.实践指南更新摘要:肉毒杆菌神经毒素用于治疗眼睑痉挛、颈部肌张力障碍、成人痉挛和头痛:美国神经病学学会指南制定小组委员会报告
Neurology. 2016 May 10;86(19):1818-26. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002560. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
8
Conversion Ratio between Botox®, Dysport®, and Xeomin® in Clinical Practice.临床实践中保妥适、吉适和乐提葆之间的换算比例。
Toxins (Basel). 2016 Mar 4;8(3):65. doi: 10.3390/toxins8030065.
9
Neutralizing Antibody and Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.中和抗体与肉毒杆菌毒素疗法:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurotox Res. 2016 Jan;29(1):105-17. doi: 10.1007/s12640-015-9565-5.
10
Safety and efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA for hemiparesis in adults with upper limb spasticity after stroke or traumatic brain injury: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.阿替利珠单抗治疗成人脑卒中和创伤性脑损伤后上肢痉挛性偏瘫的安全性和有效性:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Oct;14(10):992-1001. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00216-1. Epub 2015 Aug 26.