Hollman John H, Berling Tyler A, Crum Ellen O, Miller Kelsie M, Simmons Brent T, Youdas James W
J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Mar 1;27(2):138-143. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0130.
Hip extension with hamstring-dominant rather than gluteus maximus-dominant recruitment may increase anterior femoracetabular forces and contribute to conditions that cause hip pain. Cueing methods during hip extension exercises may facilitate greater gluteus maximus recruitment.
We examined whether specific verbal and tactile cues facilitate gluteus maximus recruitment while inhibiting hamstring recruitment during a bridging exercise.
Randomized controlled trial.
Biomechanics laboratory.
30 young adult women (age 24 [3] y; BMI 22.2 [2.4] kg/m).
Participants were tested over 2 sessions, 1 week apart, while performing 5 repetitions of a bridging exercise. At their second visit, participants in the experimental group received verbal and tactile cues intended to facilitate gluteus maximus recruitment and inhibit hamstring recruitment. Control group participants received no additional cues beyond original instructions.
Gluteus maximus and hamstring recruitment were measured with surface electromyography, normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs).
Gluteus maximus recruitment was unchanged in the control group and increased from 16.8 to 33.0% MVIC in the cueing group (F = 33.369, P < .001). Hamstring recruitment was unchanged in the control group but also increased from 16.5 to 29.8% MVIC in the cueing group (F = 6.400, P = .02). The effect size of the change in gluteus maximus recruitment in the cueing group (Cohen's d = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.9 to 2.2) was not significantly greater than the effect size in hamstring recruitment (Cohen's d = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.1 to 1.5).
Verbal and tactile cues hypothesized to facilitate gluteus maximus recruitment yielded comparable increases in both gluteus maximus and hamstring recruitment. If one intends to promote hip extension by facilitating gluteus maximus recruitment while inhibiting hamstring recruitment during bridging exercises, the cueing methods employed in this study may not produce desired effects.
在髋关节伸展时,若以腘绳肌为主导而非臀大肌为主导进行募集,可能会增加股骨髋臼前侧的压力,并导致引起髋关节疼痛的病症。髋关节伸展运动中的提示方法可能有助于更多地募集臀大肌。
我们研究了在桥式运动中,特定的言语和触觉提示是否有助于募集臀大肌,同时抑制腘绳肌的募集。
随机对照试验。
生物力学实验室。
30名年轻成年女性(年龄24[3]岁;体重指数22.2[2.4]kg/m²)。
参与者在相隔1周的2个时段接受测试,期间进行5次桥式运动重复动作。在第二次就诊时,实验组的参与者接受旨在促进臀大肌募集和抑制腘绳肌募集的言语和触觉提示。对照组参与者除了原始指导外未接受额外提示。
使用表面肌电图测量臀大肌和腘绳肌的募集情况,并将其标准化为最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)。
对照组中臀大肌的募集情况未发生变化,提示组中臀大肌的募集从16.8%MVIC增加到33.0%MVIC(F = 33.369,P <.001)。对照组中腘绳肌的募集情况未发生变化,但提示组中腘绳肌的募集也从16.5%MVIC增加到29.8%MVIC(F = 6.400,P = 0.02)。提示组中臀大肌募集变化的效应量(科恩d = 1.5,95%CI = 0.9至2.2)并不显著大于腘绳肌募集的效应量(科恩d = 0.8,95%CI = 0.1至1.5)。
假设用于促进臀大肌募集的言语和触觉提示在臀大肌和腘绳肌募集中产生了相当的增加。如果有人打算在桥式运动中通过促进臀大肌募集同时抑制腘绳肌募集来促进髋关节伸展,本研究中采用的提示方法可能不会产生预期效果。