Suppr超能文献

仰卧位抗阻髋伸展运动与仰卧位单侧桥接至中立位时臀大肌和腘绳肌活动的肌电图分析

Electromyographic analysis of gluteus maximus and hamstring activity during the supine resisted hip extension exercise versus supine unilateral bridge to neutral.

作者信息

Youdas James W, Hartman James P, Murphy Brooke A, Rundle Ashley M, Ugorowski Jenna M, Hollman John H

机构信息

a Mayo Clinic School of Health Sciences , Rochester , MN , USA.

b Winner Physical Therapy Inc ., Winner , SD , USA.

出版信息

Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Feb;33(2):124-130. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1271848. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

Abstract

Hip extension strengthening exercises which maximize gluteus maximus contributions and minimize hamstring influences may be beneficial for persons with hip pain. This study's aim was to compare muscle activation of the gluteus maximus and hamstrings from healthy subjects during a supine resisted hip extension exercise versus supine unilateral bridge to neutral. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were obtained from the right gluteus maximus and hamstrings in 13 healthy male and 13 healthy female subjects. Maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) were collected to normalize data and permit meaningful comparisons across muscles. Peak median activation of the gluteus maximus was 33.8% MVIC for the bridge and 34.7% MVIC for the hip extension exercise, whereas peak median recruitment for hamstrings was 28.4% MVIC for the bridge and 51% MVIC for the hip extension exercise. The gluteus maximus to hamstrings ratio was compared between the two exercises using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test (α = 0.05). The ratio (p = 0.014) was greater in the supine unilateral bridge (median = 111.3%) than supine hip extension exercise (median = 59.2%), suggesting a reduction of hamstring recruitment in the unilateral bridge to neutral compared to the supine resisted hip extension exercise. The supine hip extension exercise demonstrated higher EMG activity of hamstrings in comparison with supine unilateral bridge and, therefore, may be less appropriate in subjects who need to increase gluteus maximus activation.

摘要

能最大程度发挥臀大肌作用并最小化腘绳肌影响的髋关节伸展强化训练,可能对髋关节疼痛患者有益。本研究旨在比较健康受试者在仰卧位抗阻髋关节伸展训练与仰卧位单侧桥接至中立位动作中,臀大肌和腘绳肌的肌肉激活情况。从13名健康男性和13名健康女性受试者的右侧臀大肌和腘绳肌获取表面肌电图(EMG)信号。收集最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)数据以标准化数据,并允许对不同肌肉进行有意义的比较。臀大肌的峰值中位激活在桥接动作中为MVIC的33.8%,在髋关节伸展训练中为MVIC的34.7%,而腘绳肌的峰值中位募集在桥接动作中为MVIC的28.4%,在髋关节伸展训练中为MVIC的51%。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验(α = 0.05)比较两种训练动作中臀大肌与腘绳肌的比率。仰卧位单侧桥接动作(中位数 = 111.3%)中的比率(p = 0.014)高于仰卧位髋关节伸展训练(中位数 = 59.2%),这表明与仰卧位抗阻髋关节伸展训练相比,单侧桥接至中立位动作中腘绳肌的募集减少。与仰卧位单侧桥接动作相比,仰卧位髋关节伸展训练显示出腘绳肌更高的肌电图活动,因此,对于需要增加臀大肌激活的受试者可能不太合适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验