Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Kinesiology, San José State University, San José, California.
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Dec;32(12):3357-3363. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002747.
Hirose, N and Tsuruike, M. Differences in the electromyographic activity of the hamstring, gluteus maximus, and erector spinae muscles in a variety of kinetic changes. J Strength Cond Res 32(12): 3366-3372, 2018-This study aimed to clarify the differences in the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the semitendinosus (ST), semimembranosus (SM), biceps femoris long head (BFl), gluteus maximus (GM), and erector spinae (ES) muscles during leg curl and bridge exercises across different knee angles and isometric contraction outputs. Sixteen male volunteers participated in this study. The EMG of all targeted muscles was measured at 20 and 40% of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in the leg curl and during bilateral and unilateral bridge exercises. The knee flexion angle was randomly set at 30, 60, 90, and 120° during each of the exercises. The obtained data were normalized by the MVIC of the corresponding muscle, and each of the normalized values was compared with that of the ST. The EMG activity of the ST was significantly greater at 120° of knee flexion than that of 30 and 60° of knee flexion during leg curl regardless of intensity (p < 0.05), in contrast with that of the SM and BFl. However, bridge exercises diminished this inverse relationship. The ES activity changed similarly to that of the hamstrings, and no difference was observed in the activity of the GM regardless of different knee angles during bridge exercise(s). The strength and conditioning professionals should alter the knee joint angle and load during bridge and leg curl exercises according to which hamstring muscle they want to strengthen because ST, SM, and BFl EMG activity varies depending on the intensity and knee angles during these exercises.
广濑直树和鹤巻真吾。在各种动力学变化中,半腱肌、臀大肌和竖脊肌的肌电图活动差异。J 力量与调节研究 32(12):3366-3372,2018-本研究旨在阐明在腿弯举和桥接练习中,不同膝关节角度和等长收缩输出下,半腱肌(ST)、半膜肌(SM)、股二头肌长头(BFl)、臀大肌(GM)和竖脊肌(ES)肌肉的肌电图(EMG)活动差异。16 名男性志愿者参加了这项研究。在腿弯举和双侧及单侧桥接练习中,测量了所有目标肌肉在 20%和 40%最大随意等长收缩(MVIC)时的 EMG。在每种运动中,膝关节弯曲角度随机设置为 30°、60°、90°和 120°。所获得的数据通过相应肌肉的 MVIC 进行归一化,并且将每个归一化值与 ST 的归一化值进行比较。无论强度如何,在腿弯举时,ST 的 EMG 活性在膝关节弯曲 120°时明显大于 30°和 60°(p < 0.05),与 SM 和 BFl 相反。然而,桥接练习减弱了这种反比关系。ES 活性的变化与腿筋相似,在桥接练习中,无论膝关节角度如何,GM 的活性都没有差异。力量和调节专业人员应根据他们想要加强的腿筋肌肉来改变桥接和腿弯举练习中的膝关节角度和负荷,因为 ST、SM 和 BFl 的 EMG 活动随这些练习中的强度和膝关节角度而变化。