Department of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas.
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Mar;32(3):594-601. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001893.
McCurdy, K, Walker, J, and Yuen, D. Gluteus maximus and hamstring activation during selected weight-bearing resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 32(3): 594-601, 2018-The purpose of this study was to compare the gluteus maximus (GM) and hamstring group (HG) electromyographic (EMG) activation levels among selected weight-bearing resistance exercises. Eighteen young adult females with previous resistance training experience completed the study. Strength was assessed on the bilateral squat (BS) (3 repetition maximum [RM]), modified single-leg squat (MSLS) (3RM), and stiff-leg deadlift (SLDL) (8RM) to determine an 8RM load for all lifts. Surface EMG was collected after 48 hours of rest using wireless Trigno IM Sensors using EMMA software (Delsys), which also collected and synchronized 3D hip and knee motion. A maximum voluntary isometric contraction was determined for the GM and HG to normalize the EMG data. During EMG data collection, 3 repetitions were completed using an 8RM load on all 3 exercises. Gluteus maximus EMG was significantly greater than HG EMG on the BS (40.3 vs. 24.4%, p < 0.001), MSLS (65.6 vs. 40.1 %, p < 0.012), and SLDL (40.5 vs. 29.9 %, p < 0.047). The MSLS produced significantly greater HG EMG (p = 0.001) compared with the SLDL, whereas the SLDL was significantly greater (p = 0.004) than the BS. The MSLS GM EMG was also significantly greater (p < 0.001) than the SLDL and BS, whereas no difference was found between the SLDL and BS. Comparing the activation of the 2 muscle groups in all exercises, the GM seems to be the primary muscle recruited whereas the MSLS seems to produce greater GM and HG activation. The data indicate that it would be most beneficial to include the MSLS during GM and HG training.
麦卡迪、沃克和袁。在选定的负重抗阻运动中,臀大肌和腘绳肌的激活。J 力量与调理研究 32(3):594-601,2018-本研究的目的是比较选定的负重抗阻运动中臀大肌(GM)和腘绳肌(HG)肌电图(EMG)的激活水平。18 名有抗阻训练经验的年轻成年女性完成了这项研究。使用双侧深蹲(BS)(3 次最大重复[RM])、改良单腿深蹲(MSLS)(3RM)和硬拉(SLDL)(8RM)评估力量,以确定所有举重的 8RM 负荷。48 小时休息后,使用无线 Trigno IM 传感器收集表面肌电图,使用 EMMA 软件(Delsys)收集和同步 3D 髋关节和膝关节运动。还进行了 GM 和 HG 的最大自主等长收缩,以对 EMG 数据进行归一化。在 EMG 数据采集过程中,所有 3 项运动均使用 8RM 负荷完成 3 次重复。BS 上 GM 的 EMG 明显大于 HG 的 EMG(40.3%比 24.4%,p<0.001)、MSLS(65.6%比 40.1%,p<0.012)和 SLDL(40.5%比 29.9%,p<0.047)。MSLS 产生的 HG EMG 明显大于 SLDL(p=0.001),而 SLDL 明显大于 BS(p=0.004)。MSLS 的 GM EMG 也明显大于 SLDL 和 BS,而 SLDL 和 BS 之间没有差异。比较所有运动中两组肌肉的激活情况,GM 似乎是主要募集的肌肉,而 MSLS 似乎产生更大的 GM 和 HG 激活。数据表明,在 GM 和 HG 训练中,包括 MSLS 是最有益的。