Stadelmann David, Torgler Benno
University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170656. eCollection 2017.
As the public debate over stem cell research continues, the observable voting behaviour in Switzerland offers a unique opportunity to compare the voting behaviour of politicians with that of voters. By analysing the outcomes of a referendum on a liberal new bill regulating such research, we reveal an about 10 percentage point lower conditional probability of the bill being accepted by politicians than by voters. Whereas the behaviour of politicians is driven almost entirely by party affiliation, citizen votes are driven not only by party attachment but also by church attendance. Seldom or never attending church increases the probability of bill acceptance by over 15 percentage points, while supporting the Liberal Party and the Social Democratic Party instead of the Christian Democratic Party makes supporting the bill more likely for voters, suggesting that religious observance is important. The observance of these tendencies in Switzerland-an environment that promotes discussion through direct democratic rights-strongly suggests that citizens see the benefits of stem cell research.
随着公众对干细胞研究的争论持续不断,瑞士可观察到的投票行为提供了一个独特的机会,来比较政治家和选民的投票行为。通过分析一项关于规范此类研究的新的自由主义法案的全民公投结果,我们发现该法案被政治家接受的条件概率比被选民接受的条件概率低约10个百分点。政治家的行为几乎完全由党派归属驱动,而公民投票不仅受党派归属影响,还受教堂礼拜出席情况影响。很少或从不参加教堂礼拜会使法案被接受的概率增加超过15个百分点,而支持自由党和社会民主党而非基督教民主党会使选民更有可能支持该法案,这表明宗教仪式很重要。在瑞士这样一个通过直接民主权利促进讨论的环境中观察到这些趋势,强烈表明公民看到了干细胞研究的益处。