Suppr超能文献

多学科团队方法(包括一名重症监护医生)对心脏监护病房危重症患者预后的影响

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach Including an Intensivist on the Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients in the Cardiac Care Unit.

作者信息

Fanari Zaher, Barekatain Armin, Kerzner Roger, Hammami Sumaya, Weintraub William S, Maheshwari Vinay

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS; Division of Cardiology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.

Division of Cardiology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Dec;91(12):1727-1734. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of integrating a medical intensivist into a cardiac care unit (CCU) multidisciplinary team on the outcomes of CCU patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2239 CCU admissions between July 1, 2011, and July 1, 2013, which constituted patients admitted in the 12 months before and 12 months after the introduction of intensivists into the CCU multidisciplinary team. This team included a cardiologist, a medical intensivist, medical house staff, nurses, a pharmacist, a dietitian, and physical and respiratory therapists. The primary outcome was CCU mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, CCU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

After the implementation of a multidisciplinary team approach, there was a significant decrease in both adjusted CCU mortality (3.5% vs 5.9%; P=.01) and hospital mortality (4.4% vs 11.1%; P<.01). A similar impact was observed on adjusted mean CCU length of stay (2.5±2.0 vs 2.9±2.0 days; P<.01), adjusted mean hospital length of stay (7.0±4.5 vs 7.5±4.5 days; P<.01), and adjusted mean ventilation duration (2.0±1.0 vs 4.3±2.5 days; P<.01).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a multidisciplinary team approach in which an intensivist and a cardiologist comanage the critical care of CCU patients is feasible and may result in better patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

探讨在心脏监护病房(CCU)多学科团队中纳入一名医学重症监护专家对CCU患者治疗结果的影响。

患者与方法

我们对2011年7月1日至2013年7月1日期间2239例CCU入院患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,这些患者包括在重症监护专家引入CCU多学科团队之前12个月和之后12个月入院的患者。该团队包括一名心脏病专家、一名医学重症监护专家、内科住院医师、护士、一名药剂师、一名营养师以及物理治疗师和呼吸治疗师。主要结局是CCU死亡率。次要结局包括医院死亡率、CCU住院时间、医院住院时间以及机械通气时间。

结果

实施多学科团队方法后,调整后的CCU死亡率(3.5%对5.9%;P = 0.01)和医院死亡率(4.4%对11.1%;P < 0.01)均显著降低。在调整后的平均CCU住院时间(2.5±2.0天对2.9±2.0天;P < 0.01)、调整后的平均医院住院时间(7.0±4.5天对7.5±4.5天;P < 0.01)以及调整后的平均通气时间(2.0±1.0天对4.3±2.5天;P < 0.01)方面也观察到了类似影响。

结论

由一名重症监护专家和一名心脏病专家共同管理CCU患者重症护理的多学科团队方法的实施是可行的,并且可能带来更好的患者治疗结果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Propensity scores and M-structures.倾向得分与M结构。
Stat Med. 2009 Apr 30;28(9):1416-20; author reply 1420-3. doi: 10.1002/sim.3532.
10
Cardiology and the critical care crisis: a perspective.心脏病学与重症监护危机:一种观点。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 27;49(12):1279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.036. Epub 2007 Mar 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验