Andreasen Signe E, Holm Henriette B, Jørgensen Mira, Gromov Kirill, Kjærsgaard-Andersen Per, Husted Henrik
Orthopedic Department, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Orthopedic Department, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1747-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.040. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
Fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) has been shown to reduce the perioperative convalescence resulting in less postoperative morbidity, earlier fulfillment of functional milestones, and shorter hospital stay. As organizational optimization is also part of the fast-track methodology, the result could be a more cost-effective pathway altogether. As THA and TKA are potentially costly procedures and the numbers are increasing in an economical limited environment, the aim of this study is to present baseline detailed economical calculations of fast-track THA and TKA and compare this between 2 departments with different logistical set-ups.
Prospective data collection was analyzed using the time-driven activity-based costing method (TDABC) on time consumed by different staff members involved in patient treatment in the perioperative period of fast-track THA and TKA in 2 Danish orthopedic departments with standardized fast-track settings, but different logistical set-ups.
Length of stay was median 2 days in both departments. TDABC revealed minor differences in the perioperative settings between departments, but the total cost excluding the prosthesis was similar at USD 2511 and USD 2551, respectively.
Fast-track THA and TKA results in similar cost despite differences in the organizational set-up. Compared to cost associated with longer more conventional published pathways, fast-track is cheaper, which on top of the favorable published clinical outcome adds to cost efficiency and the potential for economic savings. Detailed baseline TDABC calculations are provided for comparison and further optimization of cost-benefit effectiveness.
快速康复全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术(THA和TKA)已被证明可减少围手术期康复时间,从而降低术后发病率,更早实现功能里程碑,并缩短住院时间。由于组织优化也是快速康复方法的一部分,总体结果可能是一条更具成本效益的途径。鉴于THA和TKA可能是成本高昂的手术,且在经济受限的环境中手术数量不断增加,本研究的目的是给出快速康复THA和TKA的详细基线经济计算,并在两个后勤设置不同的科室之间进行比较。
在丹麦两个骨科科室对快速康复THA和TKA围手术期参与患者治疗的不同工作人员所消耗的时间,采用时间驱动作业成本法(TDABC)对前瞻性数据收集进行分析。这两个科室具有标准化的快速康复设置,但后勤设置不同。
两个科室的住院时间中位数均为2天。TDABC显示科室之间围手术期设置存在细微差异,但不包括假体的总成本相似,分别为2511美元和2551美元。
尽管组织设置不同,但快速康复THA和TKA的成本相似。与更长的传统公布途径相关的成本相比,快速康复更便宜,这除了已公布的良好临床结果外,还提高了成本效益和经济节约的潜力。提供了详细的基线TDABC计算,用于比较和进一步优化成本效益。