Suppr超能文献

体格检查测试在诊断关节炎前期髋关节关节内病变中的敏感性和特异性差异很大:一项系统评价。

Sensitivity and Specificity for Physical Examination Tests in Diagnosing Prearthritic Intra-Articular Hip Pathology Are Highly Variable: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Dhillon Jaydeep, Hernandez Evan J, Keeter Carson, Kraeutler Matthew J

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samaritan Health Services, Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Mar 13;7(3):101117. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101117. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the accuracy of various physical examination tests for diagnosing prearthritic intra-articular hip pathology.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies that measured sensitivity and/or specificity of various physical examination tests for diagnosing prearthritic intra-articular hip pathology such as a labral tear, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), or microinstability of the hip joint. The search phrase used was . A total of 15 studies (4 Level I, 6 Level II, and 5 Level III) met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 1,378 hips. The patients had a mean age range of 16.0 to 60.2 years, with males ranging from 11% to 100% of the cohort. For diagnosing hip labral tears, the FADIR (flexion, adduction, internal rotation) test showed the highest sensitivity of 100%, and the FABER (Flexion, Abduction, External Rotation) test showed the highest specificity of 100% based on reference standard comparisons of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and direct visualization during hip arthroscopy (HA), respectively. For diagnosing FAI, the IROP (Internal Rotation Over Pressure) test showed the highest sensitivity of 91%, and the FADIR test showed the highest specificity of 47% based on reference standard comparisons of MRI and HA, respectively. For diagnosing hip microinstability, the AB-HEER (abduction-hyperextension-external rotation) test showed the highest sensitivity of 80.6%, and the Prone Instability test showed the highest specificity of 97.6% based on reference standard comparisons of MRI and HA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found high variability in the sensitivity and specificity of physical examination tests for diagnosing prearthritic intra-articular hip disorders.

摘要

目的

对各种用于诊断关节炎前期髋关节关节内病变的体格检查测试的准确性进行系统评价。

方法

根据PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价,通过检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,以确定测量各种用于诊断关节炎前期髋关节关节内病变(如盂唇撕裂、股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)或髋关节微不稳定)的体格检查测试的敏感性和/或特异性的研究。使用的检索词为 。共有15项研究(4项I级、6项II级和5项III级)符合纳入标准,共涉及1378个髋关节。患者的平均年龄范围为16.0至60.2岁,男性在队列中的比例为11%至100%。对于诊断髋关节盂唇撕裂,基于磁共振成像(MRI)和髋关节镜检查(HA)期间的直接可视化的参考标准比较,FADIR(屈曲、内收、内旋)试验显示出最高敏感性,为100%,FABER(屈曲、外展、外旋)试验显示出最高特异性,为100%。对于诊断FAI,基于MRI和HA的参考标准比较,IROP(内旋过伸)试验显示出最高敏感性,为91%,FADIR试验显示出最高特异性,为47%。对于诊断髋关节微不稳定,基于MRI和HA的参考标准比较,AB-HEER(外展-过伸-外旋)试验显示出最高敏感性,为80.6%,俯卧位不稳定试验显示出最高特异性,为97.6%。

结论

本研究发现,用于诊断关节炎前期髋关节关节内疾病的体格检查测试的敏感性和特异性存在很大差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bcd/12276548/f527c5ba9d9e/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验