Wellings Elizabeth, Vassiliades Lauren, Abdalla Reem
Medical Student, University of Central Florida College of Medicine.
Medical Student III, University of Central Florida College of Medicine.
Cureus. 2016 Dec 28;8(12):e945. doi: 10.7759/cureus.945.
While the guidelines for breast cancer screening in average-risk women are well established, screening in high-risk women is not as clear. For women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, current guidelines recommend screening by clinical breast examination and mammography starting at age 30. For certain high-risk women, additional screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is encouraged. This review focuses on differentiating imaging modalities used for screening women at high-risk for breast cancer over the age of 50 by discussing the different imaging techniques, cost versus benefit, detection rates, and impact on survival. While mammography is the only imaging modality proven to reduce mortality from breast cancer, MRI is more sensitive in identifying cancers. MRI can often identify smaller malignancies at a greater resolution at an earlier stage. The use of MRI would be more cost effective as there would be less need for invasive therapeutic procedures. Research thus far has not identified an age-specific preference in imaging modality. There are no guidelines for high-risk women that specify screening with respect to age (i.e., older than 50 years old). More research is needed before screening guidelines in different age groups with various risk factors can be established.
虽然普通风险女性的乳腺癌筛查指南已很完善,但高风险女性的筛查却不那么明确。对于携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性,当前指南建议从30岁开始通过临床乳腺检查和乳房X线摄影进行筛查。对于某些高风险女性,鼓励额外进行磁共振成像(MRI)筛查。本综述通过讨论不同的成像技术、成本效益、检出率以及对生存率的影响,着重区分用于筛查50岁以上乳腺癌高风险女性的成像方式。虽然乳房X线摄影是唯一被证明可降低乳腺癌死亡率的成像方式,但MRI在识别癌症方面更敏感。MRI通常能够在更早阶段以更高分辨率识别较小的恶性肿瘤。使用MRI可能更具成本效益,因为侵入性治疗程序的需求会更少。迄今为止的研究尚未确定在成像方式上存在特定年龄偏好。对于高风险女性,没有关于按年龄(即50岁以上)进行筛查的指南。在能够制定针对不同年龄组且具有各种风险因素的筛查指南之前,还需要更多研究。