Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.
School of Management, Yale University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Feb;146(2):269-285. doi: 10.1037/xge0000258.
Historically high levels of economic inequality likely have important consequences for relationships between people of the same and different social class backgrounds. Here, we test the prediction that social affiliation among same-class partners is stronger at the extremes of the class spectrum, given that these groups are highly distinctive and most separated from others by institutional and economic forces. An internal meta-analysis of 4 studies (N = 723) provided support for this hypothesis. Participant and partner social class were interactively, rather than additively, associated with social affiliation, indexed by affiliative behaviors and emotions during structured laboratory interactions and in daily life. Further, response surface analyses revealed that paired upper or lower class partners generally affiliated more than average-class pairs. Analyses with separate class indices suggested that these patterns are driven more by parental income and subjective social class than by parental education. The findings illuminate the dynamics of same- and cross-class interactions, revealing that not all same-class interactions feature the same degree of affiliation. They also reveal the importance of studying social class from an intergroup perspective. (PsycINFO Database Record
历史上高水平的经济不平等可能对来自相同和不同社会阶层背景的人的关系产生重要影响。在这里,我们检验了这样一种假设,即在阶级光谱的极端情况下,同一阶级的伙伴之间的社会联系更紧密,因为这些群体非常独特,并且受到制度和经济力量的最大隔离。对 4 项研究的内部荟萃分析(N=723)提供了对这一假设的支持。参与者和伴侣的社会阶层与社会联系呈交互作用,而不是加性作用,这由在结构化实验室互动和日常生活中的亲和行为和情感来衡量。此外,响应面分析表明,配对的上层或下层阶级伙伴通常比平均阶级伙伴更有亲和力。使用单独的阶级指标进行的分析表明,这些模式更多地是由父母收入和主观社会阶层驱动的,而不是由父母教育驱动的。这些发现阐明了相同和跨阶级互动的动态,表明并非所有相同阶级的互动都具有相同程度的亲和力。它们还揭示了从群体间角度研究社会阶层的重要性。